眶隔综合征的紧急处理:外侧泪囊切开术和泪囊溶解术病例系列。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Rebecca Ilona Peisah, Kevin Ostrowski
{"title":"眶隔综合征的紧急处理:外侧泪囊切开术和泪囊溶解术病例系列。","authors":"Rebecca Ilona Peisah, Kevin Ostrowski","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) is considered a time critical condition that requires urgent surgical decompression to preserve vision. This study aims to evaluate the current clinical criteria for performing a lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC) in the emergency management of suspected traumatic OCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit of patients with suspected traumatic OCS presenting to an adult major trauma centre between January 1, 2017, and August 1, 2022, was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 patients with traumatic OCS treated with a LCC were identified. Five patients satisfied the definitive clinical criteria for LCC. The remaining 15 patients received LCC based on secondary clinical findings, or computed tomography (CT) findings suggestive of OCS. 17 patients received non-contrast CT scanning prior to LCC. Of the nine patients noted to regain baseline or close to baseline vision, only one was decompressed within two hours of injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite OCS being a clinical diagnosis, the signs and symptoms associated with OCS are difficult to elicit on presentation. Seeking imaging should not delay time to decompression when clinical diagnostic criteria are present. However, imaging may have a role in determining the need for orbital decompression where the absolute indications for LCC cannot be adequately assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency management of orbital compartment syndrome: Lateral canthotomy and cantholysis case series.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Ilona Peisah, Kevin Ostrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.auec.2024.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) is considered a time critical condition that requires urgent surgical decompression to preserve vision. This study aims to evaluate the current clinical criteria for performing a lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC) in the emergency management of suspected traumatic OCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective audit of patients with suspected traumatic OCS presenting to an adult major trauma centre between January 1, 2017, and August 1, 2022, was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 patients with traumatic OCS treated with a LCC were identified. Five patients satisfied the definitive clinical criteria for LCC. The remaining 15 patients received LCC based on secondary clinical findings, or computed tomography (CT) findings suggestive of OCS. 17 patients received non-contrast CT scanning prior to LCC. Of the nine patients noted to regain baseline or close to baseline vision, only one was decompressed within two hours of injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite OCS being a clinical diagnosis, the signs and symptoms associated with OCS are difficult to elicit on presentation. Seeking imaging should not delay time to decompression when clinical diagnostic criteria are present. However, imaging may have a role in determining the need for orbital decompression where the absolute indications for LCC cannot be adequately assessed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.09.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:眼眶隔室综合征(OCS)被认为是一种需要紧急手术减压以保护视力的危重症。本研究旨在评估在紧急处理疑似外伤性眼眶隔室综合征时实施外侧角膜切开术和角膜溶解术(LCC)的现行临床标准:方法:对2017年1月1日至2022年8月1日期间到成人主要创伤中心就诊的疑似外伤性OCS患者进行回顾性审核。结果:确定了20名接受LCC治疗的外伤性OCS患者。5名患者符合LCC的明确临床标准。其余 15 名患者根据继发性临床发现或计算机断层扫描(CT)结果提示 OCS,接受了 LCC 治疗。17 名患者在 LCC 之前接受了非对比 CT 扫描。在九名恢复基线或接近基线视力的患者中,只有一人在受伤后两小时内进行了减压:结论:尽管OCS是一种临床诊断,但与OCS相关的体征和症状在就诊时很难表现出来。在具备临床诊断标准的情况下,寻求影像学检查不应延误减压时间。不过,在无法充分评估 LCC 的绝对适应症时,影像学检查可能有助于确定是否需要进行眼眶减压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency management of orbital compartment syndrome: Lateral canthotomy and cantholysis case series.

Background: Orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) is considered a time critical condition that requires urgent surgical decompression to preserve vision. This study aims to evaluate the current clinical criteria for performing a lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LCC) in the emergency management of suspected traumatic OCS.

Methods: A retrospective audit of patients with suspected traumatic OCS presenting to an adult major trauma centre between January 1, 2017, and August 1, 2022, was performed.

Results: 20 patients with traumatic OCS treated with a LCC were identified. Five patients satisfied the definitive clinical criteria for LCC. The remaining 15 patients received LCC based on secondary clinical findings, or computed tomography (CT) findings suggestive of OCS. 17 patients received non-contrast CT scanning prior to LCC. Of the nine patients noted to regain baseline or close to baseline vision, only one was decompressed within two hours of injury.

Conclusion: Despite OCS being a clinical diagnosis, the signs and symptoms associated with OCS are difficult to elicit on presentation. Seeking imaging should not delay time to decompression when clinical diagnostic criteria are present. However, imaging may have a role in determining the need for orbital decompression where the absolute indications for LCC cannot be adequately assessed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信