英格兰额外角色报销计划 (ARRS) 工作人员对处方模式和患者满意度的影响。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Catia Nicodemo, Chris Salisbury, Stavros Petrou
{"title":"英格兰额外角色报销计划 (ARRS) 工作人员对处方模式和患者满意度的影响。","authors":"Catia Nicodemo, Chris Salisbury, Stavros Petrou","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2019, the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was introduced in England as a crucial component of the government's manifesto pledge to enhance access to general practice. The primary objective was to recruit 26,000 extra personnel through new roles into general practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to analyse the effects of ARRS staff on prescription rates and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>The study was a retrospective panel data analysis combining data from the General Workforce Minimum Dataset and National Health Service (NHS) Digital datasets about primary care practices and their activity from 2018 until 2022. The study included data from more than 6000 general practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the association between ARRS staff and prescription rates and patient satisfaction, controlling for patient and practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that ARSS roles tend to be more frequent in larger general practices, with fewer full-time general practitioners per patient, and with more overseas trained general practitioners. The use of ARRS staff was significantly associated with lower prescription rates (β=-0.52, p<0.000) and higher patient satisfaction (β=3.2, p<0.000), after controlling for patient and practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that ARRS has the potential to have a positive role in primary care, notably through reduced prescription rates and improved patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of ARRS on primary care, including patient outcomes and health care costs, and the potential barriers to its implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) staff in England on Prescription Patterns and Patient Satisfaction.\",\"authors\":\"Catia Nicodemo, Chris Salisbury, Stavros Petrou\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2019, the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was introduced in England as a crucial component of the government's manifesto pledge to enhance access to general practice. The primary objective was to recruit 26,000 extra personnel through new roles into general practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to analyse the effects of ARRS staff on prescription rates and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>The study was a retrospective panel data analysis combining data from the General Workforce Minimum Dataset and National Health Service (NHS) Digital datasets about primary care practices and their activity from 2018 until 2022. The study included data from more than 6000 general practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the association between ARRS staff and prescription rates and patient satisfaction, controlling for patient and practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that ARSS roles tend to be more frequent in larger general practices, with fewer full-time general practitioners per patient, and with more overseas trained general practitioners. The use of ARRS staff was significantly associated with lower prescription rates (β=-0.52, p<0.000) and higher patient satisfaction (β=3.2, p<0.000), after controlling for patient and practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that ARRS has the potential to have a positive role in primary care, notably through reduced prescription rates and improved patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of ARRS on primary care, including patient outcomes and health care costs, and the potential barriers to its implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0196\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019 年,英格兰推出了 "额外角色报销计划"(ARRS),这是政府在宣言中承诺加强全科医疗服务的重要组成部分。主要目标是通过新的角色为全科诊所招募 2.6 万名额外人员。目的:本研究旨在分析 ARRS 工作人员对处方率和患者满意度的影响:该研究是一项回顾性面板数据分析,结合了普通劳动力最低数据集(General Workforce Minimum Dataset)和国民健康服务(NHS)数字数据集(NHS Digital)中有关2018年至2022年初级保健实践及其活动的数据。研究包括来自 6000 多家全科诊所的数据:在控制患者和诊所特征的前提下,进行了线性回归分析,以确定ARRS人员与处方率和患者满意度之间的关联:结果表明,在规模较大、每名患者拥有的全职全科医生人数较少、接受过海外培训的全科医生人数较多的全科诊所中,ARRS 人员的使用频率较高。ARRS人员的使用与较低的处方率明显相关(β=-0.52,p):这项研究表明,ARRS 有可能在初级医疗中发挥积极作用,特别是通过降低处方率和提高患者满意度。还需要进一步研究探讨 ARRS 对初级医疗的长期影响,包括患者的治疗效果和医疗成本,以及实施 ARRS 的潜在障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) staff in England on Prescription Patterns and Patient Satisfaction.

Background: In 2019, the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was introduced in England as a crucial component of the government's manifesto pledge to enhance access to general practice. The primary objective was to recruit 26,000 extra personnel through new roles into general practice.

Aim: This study aimed to analyse the effects of ARRS staff on prescription rates and patient satisfaction.

Design and setting: The study was a retrospective panel data analysis combining data from the General Workforce Minimum Dataset and National Health Service (NHS) Digital datasets about primary care practices and their activity from 2018 until 2022. The study included data from more than 6000 general practices.

Methods: A linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the association between ARRS staff and prescription rates and patient satisfaction, controlling for patient and practice characteristics.

Results: The results showed that ARSS roles tend to be more frequent in larger general practices, with fewer full-time general practitioners per patient, and with more overseas trained general practitioners. The use of ARRS staff was significantly associated with lower prescription rates (β=-0.52, p<0.000) and higher patient satisfaction (β=3.2, p<0.000), after controlling for patient and practice characteristics.

Conclusion: This study suggests that ARRS has the potential to have a positive role in primary care, notably through reduced prescription rates and improved patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of ARRS on primary care, including patient outcomes and health care costs, and the potential barriers to its implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信