在扳机指松解术中需要进行尺骨浅肌滑脱切除术的风险因素。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Stephanie A Kwan, Matthew B Sherman, Daniel Fletcher, Jonas L Matzon
{"title":"在扳机指松解术中需要进行尺骨浅肌滑脱切除术的风险因素。","authors":"Stephanie A Kwan, Matthew B Sherman, Daniel Fletcher, Jonas L Matzon","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ulnar superficialis slip resection (USSR) has been described to address persistent postoperative triggering following trigger finger release (TFR). The primary purpose of our study was to evaluate the results of simultaneous TFR and USSR under wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT). The secondary purpose was to identify patient characteristics and risk factors associated with persistent triggering following A1 pulley release requiring USSR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively identified 1,005 patients who underwent TFR at one institution by a single fellowship-trained, hand surgeon under WALANT from 2015 to 2023. Nine hundred ninety-two patients were treated with TFR alone. Twelve patients (1.2%) underwent USSR because of persistent triggering that was identified in the operating room after release of the A1 pulley. An age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched cohort of 28 patients who underwent TFR alone was created. Medical records were reviewed for demographics and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 patients (14 digits) underwent TFR with USSR. The long finger was the most commonly affected finger (6, 42%). Patients in the USSR group had more average lifetime trigger fingers compared with the control group (4 vs 1). Additionally, the percentage of patients who had previously undergone TFRs for other fingers was higher in the USSR group (100%) compared with the control group (36%). After surgery, 6 patients (4 USSR and 2 control) underwent formal hand therapy for postoperative stiffness with USSR patients receiving therapy more often than controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although uncommon, some patients (1.2%) who undergo TFR require USSR for persistent triggering following A1 pulley release. Patients who have had more lifetime trigger fingers and/or who have previously undergone TFR for other fingers are more likely to need USSR. No serious complications were incurred by patients who underwent USSR, but these patients may benefit from hand therapy compared to those undergoing isolated TFR.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic III.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Requiring Ulnar Superficialis Slip Resection During Trigger Finger Release.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie A Kwan, Matthew B Sherman, Daniel Fletcher, Jonas L Matzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ulnar superficialis slip resection (USSR) has been described to address persistent postoperative triggering following trigger finger release (TFR). The primary purpose of our study was to evaluate the results of simultaneous TFR and USSR under wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT). The secondary purpose was to identify patient characteristics and risk factors associated with persistent triggering following A1 pulley release requiring USSR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively identified 1,005 patients who underwent TFR at one institution by a single fellowship-trained, hand surgeon under WALANT from 2015 to 2023. Nine hundred ninety-two patients were treated with TFR alone. Twelve patients (1.2%) underwent USSR because of persistent triggering that was identified in the operating room after release of the A1 pulley. An age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched cohort of 28 patients who underwent TFR alone was created. Medical records were reviewed for demographics and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 patients (14 digits) underwent TFR with USSR. The long finger was the most commonly affected finger (6, 42%). Patients in the USSR group had more average lifetime trigger fingers compared with the control group (4 vs 1). Additionally, the percentage of patients who had previously undergone TFRs for other fingers was higher in the USSR group (100%) compared with the control group (36%). After surgery, 6 patients (4 USSR and 2 control) underwent formal hand therapy for postoperative stiffness with USSR patients receiving therapy more often than controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although uncommon, some patients (1.2%) who undergo TFR require USSR for persistent triggering following A1 pulley release. Patients who have had more lifetime trigger fingers and/or who have previously undergone TFR for other fingers are more likely to need USSR. No serious complications were incurred by patients who underwent USSR, but these patients may benefit from hand therapy compared to those undergoing isolated TFR.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:有人曾描述过用尺骨浅肌滑脱切除术(USSR)来解决扳机指松解术(TFR)后的术后持续触发问题。我们研究的主要目的是评估在无止血带(WALANT)宽醒局部麻醉下同时进行 TFR 和 USSR 的效果。次要目的是确定与需要 USSR 的 A1 滑轮松解术后持续触发相关的患者特征和风险因素:我们回顾性地识别了2015年至2023年期间在一家医疗机构接受TFR治疗的1005名患者,这些患者均由一名接受过研究员培训的手外科医生在WALANT下进行治疗。992名患者仅接受了TFR治疗。有 12 名患者(1.2%)在释放 A1 滑轮后在手术室发现持续触发,因此接受了 USSR 治疗。我们建立了一个年龄、性别和体重指数相匹配的队列,其中包括 28 名单独接受 TFR 治疗的患者。对医疗记录中的人口统计学和并发症进行了审查:共有 12 名患者(14 位数)接受了 TFR 和 USSR。长指是最常受影响的手指(6 个,42%)。与对照组相比,USSR 组患者的平均终生扳机指数量更多(4 对 1)。此外,与对照组(36%)相比,USSR 组患者之前曾因其他手指接受过扳机指手术的比例更高(100%)。术后,6 名患者(4 名苏联患者和 2 名对照组患者)因术后僵硬接受了正规的手部治疗,其中苏联患者接受治疗的频率高于对照组:尽管并不常见,但一些接受 TFR 手术的患者(1.2%)在 A1 滑轮松解术后因持续触发而需要接受 USSR 治疗。终生有较多扳机指和/或曾因其他手指接受过 TFR 的患者更有可能需要 USSR。接受USSR的患者未出现严重并发症,但与接受孤立TFR的患者相比,这些患者可能会从手部治疗中获益:治疗 III.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors for Requiring Ulnar Superficialis Slip Resection During Trigger Finger Release.

Purpose: Ulnar superficialis slip resection (USSR) has been described to address persistent postoperative triggering following trigger finger release (TFR). The primary purpose of our study was to evaluate the results of simultaneous TFR and USSR under wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT). The secondary purpose was to identify patient characteristics and risk factors associated with persistent triggering following A1 pulley release requiring USSR.

Method: We retrospectively identified 1,005 patients who underwent TFR at one institution by a single fellowship-trained, hand surgeon under WALANT from 2015 to 2023. Nine hundred ninety-two patients were treated with TFR alone. Twelve patients (1.2%) underwent USSR because of persistent triggering that was identified in the operating room after release of the A1 pulley. An age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched cohort of 28 patients who underwent TFR alone was created. Medical records were reviewed for demographics and complications.

Results: A total of 12 patients (14 digits) underwent TFR with USSR. The long finger was the most commonly affected finger (6, 42%). Patients in the USSR group had more average lifetime trigger fingers compared with the control group (4 vs 1). Additionally, the percentage of patients who had previously undergone TFRs for other fingers was higher in the USSR group (100%) compared with the control group (36%). After surgery, 6 patients (4 USSR and 2 control) underwent formal hand therapy for postoperative stiffness with USSR patients receiving therapy more often than controls.

Conclusions: Although uncommon, some patients (1.2%) who undergo TFR require USSR for persistent triggering following A1 pulley release. Patients who have had more lifetime trigger fingers and/or who have previously undergone TFR for other fingers are more likely to need USSR. No serious complications were incurred by patients who underwent USSR, but these patients may benefit from hand therapy compared to those undergoing isolated TFR.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信