Daniel P Kidder, Leslie A Fierro, Elena Luna, Heather Salvaggio, Amanda McWhorter, Shelly-Ann Bowen, Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer, Sally Thigpen, Dayna Alexander, Theresa L Armstead, Euna August, Destiny Bruce, Seseni Nu Clarke, Cassandra Davis, Amia Downes, Sarah Gill, L Duane House, Michael Kerzner, Karen Kun, Karen Mumford, Leah Robin, Dara Schlueter, Michael Schooley, Eduardo Valverde, Linda Vo, Donjanea Williams, Kai Young
{"title":"疾病预防控制中心计划评估框架,2024 年。","authors":"Daniel P Kidder, Leslie A Fierro, Elena Luna, Heather Salvaggio, Amanda McWhorter, Shelly-Ann Bowen, Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer, Sally Thigpen, Dayna Alexander, Theresa L Armstead, Euna August, Destiny Bruce, Seseni Nu Clarke, Cassandra Davis, Amia Downes, Sarah Gill, L Duane House, Michael Kerzner, Karen Kun, Karen Mumford, Leah Robin, Dara Schlueter, Michael Schooley, Eduardo Valverde, Linda Vo, Donjanea Williams, Kai Young","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr7306a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Program evaluation is a critical tool for understanding and improving organizational activities and systems. This report updates the 1999 CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health (CDC. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 1999;48[No. RR-11];1-40) by integrating major advancements in the fields of evaluation and public health, lessons learned from practical applications of the original framework, and current Federal agency policies and practices. A practical, nonprescriptive tool, the updated 2024 framework is designed to summarize and organize essential elements of program evaluation, and can be applied at any level from individual programs to broader systems by novices and experts for planning and implementing an evaluation. Although many of the key aspects from the 1999 framework remain, certain key differences exist. For example, this updated framework also includes six steps that describe the general process of evaluation planning and implementation, but some content and step names have changed (e.g., the first step has been renamed Assess context). The standards for high-quality evaluation remain central to the framework, although they have been updated to the five Federal evaluation standards. The most substantial change from the 1999 framework is the addition of three cross-cutting actions that are core tenets to incorporate within each evaluation step: engage collaboratively, advance equity, and learn from and use insights. The 2024 framework provides a guide for designing and conducting evaluation across many topics within and outside of public health that anyone involved in program evaluation efforts can use alone or in conjunction with other evaluation approaches, tools, or methods to build evidence, understand programs, and refine evidence-based decision-making to improve all program outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":"73 6","pages":"1-37"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CDC Program Evaluation Framework, 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P Kidder, Leslie A Fierro, Elena Luna, Heather Salvaggio, Amanda McWhorter, Shelly-Ann Bowen, Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer, Sally Thigpen, Dayna Alexander, Theresa L Armstead, Euna August, Destiny Bruce, Seseni Nu Clarke, Cassandra Davis, Amia Downes, Sarah Gill, L Duane House, Michael Kerzner, Karen Kun, Karen Mumford, Leah Robin, Dara Schlueter, Michael Schooley, Eduardo Valverde, Linda Vo, Donjanea Williams, Kai Young\",\"doi\":\"10.15585/mmwr.rr7306a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Program evaluation is a critical tool for understanding and improving organizational activities and systems. This report updates the 1999 CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health (CDC. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 1999;48[No. RR-11];1-40) by integrating major advancements in the fields of evaluation and public health, lessons learned from practical applications of the original framework, and current Federal agency policies and practices. A practical, nonprescriptive tool, the updated 2024 framework is designed to summarize and organize essential elements of program evaluation, and can be applied at any level from individual programs to broader systems by novices and experts for planning and implementing an evaluation. Although many of the key aspects from the 1999 framework remain, certain key differences exist. For example, this updated framework also includes six steps that describe the general process of evaluation planning and implementation, but some content and step names have changed (e.g., the first step has been renamed Assess context). The standards for high-quality evaluation remain central to the framework, although they have been updated to the five Federal evaluation standards. The most substantial change from the 1999 framework is the addition of three cross-cutting actions that are core tenets to incorporate within each evaluation step: engage collaboratively, advance equity, and learn from and use insights. The 2024 framework provides a guide for designing and conducting evaluation across many topics within and outside of public health that anyone involved in program evaluation efforts can use alone or in conjunction with other evaluation approaches, tools, or methods to build evidence, understand programs, and refine evidence-based decision-making to improve all program outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports\",\"volume\":\"73 6\",\"pages\":\"1-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":33.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444645/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7306a1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7306a1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Program evaluation is a critical tool for understanding and improving organizational activities and systems. This report updates the 1999 CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health (CDC. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 1999;48[No. RR-11];1-40) by integrating major advancements in the fields of evaluation and public health, lessons learned from practical applications of the original framework, and current Federal agency policies and practices. A practical, nonprescriptive tool, the updated 2024 framework is designed to summarize and organize essential elements of program evaluation, and can be applied at any level from individual programs to broader systems by novices and experts for planning and implementing an evaluation. Although many of the key aspects from the 1999 framework remain, certain key differences exist. For example, this updated framework also includes six steps that describe the general process of evaluation planning and implementation, but some content and step names have changed (e.g., the first step has been renamed Assess context). The standards for high-quality evaluation remain central to the framework, although they have been updated to the five Federal evaluation standards. The most substantial change from the 1999 framework is the addition of three cross-cutting actions that are core tenets to incorporate within each evaluation step: engage collaboratively, advance equity, and learn from and use insights. The 2024 framework provides a guide for designing and conducting evaluation across many topics within and outside of public health that anyone involved in program evaluation efforts can use alone or in conjunction with other evaluation approaches, tools, or methods to build evidence, understand programs, and refine evidence-based decision-making to improve all program outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The MMWR series of publications is published by the Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S.
The MMWR Recommendations and Reports contain in-depth articles that relay policy statements for prevention and treatment in all areas in the CDC’s scope of responsibility (e.g., recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices).