Christos Koukos, Vasileios Giannatos, Andreas Panagopoulos, Zinon Kokkalis, David Latz, Kerem Bilsel, Arrigoni Paolo, Fredy Montoya
{"title":"对年龄大于 70 岁的肩袖后方大面积撕裂患者进行单排与经骨等效双排的配对分析。","authors":"Christos Koukos, Vasileios Giannatos, Andreas Panagopoulos, Zinon Kokkalis, David Latz, Kerem Bilsel, Arrigoni Paolo, Fredy Montoya","doi":"10.1007/s00590-024-04113-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the results of single versus double row (TEO) in massive tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff in patients older than 70 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2019 and July 2022, 46 patients, older than 70 years old, were operated on, in two centers, by one surgeon (FM), in one center, we performed a single-row repair, while in the other a double row, transosseous equivalent. Patients were paired by age and gender. All patients were studied with a preoperative MRI along with preoperative age and gender adjusted constant score. Postoperative patients were evaluated at the end of the FU. Mean time of FU for single row was 3.2 years (2-4.1) and for TOE was 3.5 years (2.4-3). Mean age for SR patients was 71.15 years (70-82) and for TOE was 74.8 years (70-81). We were able to evaluate 20 pairs of patients (15 pairs of females and five pairs of males).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CS differed in both groups of patients. Patients operated on with TOE had a better, but non-significant CS 81.3 (TOE) versus 75.7 (SR) p > 0.05. The patients operated own with TOE showed statistically significant better arm abduction strength than patients operated on with SR (p < 0.05). There was a trend for patients operated on with TOE to have a better ROM and less pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of our work show that patients older than 70 years old, with repairable RCT operated on with a transosseous equivalent, have a trend to have a better CS and a significantly better strength than patients operated on with SR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":"4099-4104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A match-pair analysis of single row vs transosseous equivalent double row in massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients > 70 years old.\",\"authors\":\"Christos Koukos, Vasileios Giannatos, Andreas Panagopoulos, Zinon Kokkalis, David Latz, Kerem Bilsel, Arrigoni Paolo, Fredy Montoya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00590-024-04113-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the results of single versus double row (TEO) in massive tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff in patients older than 70 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2019 and July 2022, 46 patients, older than 70 years old, were operated on, in two centers, by one surgeon (FM), in one center, we performed a single-row repair, while in the other a double row, transosseous equivalent. Patients were paired by age and gender. All patients were studied with a preoperative MRI along with preoperative age and gender adjusted constant score. Postoperative patients were evaluated at the end of the FU. Mean time of FU for single row was 3.2 years (2-4.1) and for TOE was 3.5 years (2.4-3). Mean age for SR patients was 71.15 years (70-82) and for TOE was 74.8 years (70-81). We were able to evaluate 20 pairs of patients (15 pairs of females and five pairs of males).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CS differed in both groups of patients. Patients operated on with TOE had a better, but non-significant CS 81.3 (TOE) versus 75.7 (SR) p > 0.05. The patients operated own with TOE showed statistically significant better arm abduction strength than patients operated on with SR (p < 0.05). There was a trend for patients operated on with TOE to have a better ROM and less pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of our work show that patients older than 70 years old, with repairable RCT operated on with a transosseous equivalent, have a trend to have a better CS and a significantly better strength than patients operated on with SR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4099-4104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04113-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04113-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言本研究旨在比较单排与双排(TEO)对70岁以上肩袖后上方大面积撕裂患者的治疗效果:在2019年10月至2022年7月期间,由一位外科医生(FM)在两个中心为46名70岁以上的患者进行了手术。在一个中心,我们进行了单排修复,而在另一个中心,我们进行了双排、经骨等效修复。患者按年龄和性别配对。所有患者在术前都接受了磁共振成像检查,并进行了术前年龄和性别恒定评分调整。术后患者在 FU 结束时接受评估。单排患者的平均治疗时间为 3.2 年(2-4.1 年),TOE 患者的平均治疗时间为 3.5 年(2.4-3 年)。SR患者的平均年龄为71.15岁(70-82岁),TOE患者的平均年龄为74.8岁(70-81岁)。我们对 20 对患者(15 对女性和 5 对男性)进行了评估:两组患者的 CS 均有所不同。TOE手术患者的CS值为81.3(TOE)对75.7(SR),P > 0.05。采用 TOE 手术的患者的手臂外展力量明显优于采用 SR 手术的患者(P):我们的研究结果表明,70 岁以上的可修复 RCT 患者在接受经骨等位手术后,其 CS 和力量明显优于接受 SR 手术的患者。
A match-pair analysis of single row vs transosseous equivalent double row in massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients > 70 years old.
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the results of single versus double row (TEO) in massive tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff in patients older than 70 years old.
Methods: Between October 2019 and July 2022, 46 patients, older than 70 years old, were operated on, in two centers, by one surgeon (FM), in one center, we performed a single-row repair, while in the other a double row, transosseous equivalent. Patients were paired by age and gender. All patients were studied with a preoperative MRI along with preoperative age and gender adjusted constant score. Postoperative patients were evaluated at the end of the FU. Mean time of FU for single row was 3.2 years (2-4.1) and for TOE was 3.5 years (2.4-3). Mean age for SR patients was 71.15 years (70-82) and for TOE was 74.8 years (70-81). We were able to evaluate 20 pairs of patients (15 pairs of females and five pairs of males).
Results: CS differed in both groups of patients. Patients operated on with TOE had a better, but non-significant CS 81.3 (TOE) versus 75.7 (SR) p > 0.05. The patients operated own with TOE showed statistically significant better arm abduction strength than patients operated on with SR (p < 0.05). There was a trend for patients operated on with TOE to have a better ROM and less pain.
Discussion: The results of our work show that patients older than 70 years old, with repairable RCT operated on with a transosseous equivalent, have a trend to have a better CS and a significantly better strength than patients operated on with SR.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.