对年龄大于 70 岁的肩袖后方大面积撕裂患者进行单排与经骨等效双排的配对分析。

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Christos Koukos, Vasileios Giannatos, Andreas Panagopoulos, Zinon Kokkalis, David Latz, Kerem Bilsel, Arrigoni Paolo, Fredy Montoya
{"title":"对年龄大于 70 岁的肩袖后方大面积撕裂患者进行单排与经骨等效双排的配对分析。","authors":"Christos Koukos, Vasileios Giannatos, Andreas Panagopoulos, Zinon Kokkalis, David Latz, Kerem Bilsel, Arrigoni Paolo, Fredy Montoya","doi":"10.1007/s00590-024-04113-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the results of single versus double row (TEO) in massive tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff in patients older than 70 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2019 and July 2022, 46 patients, older than 70 years old, were operated on, in two centers, by one surgeon (FM), in one center, we performed a single-row repair, while in the other a double row, transosseous equivalent. Patients were paired by age and gender. All patients were studied with a preoperative MRI along with preoperative age and gender adjusted constant score. Postoperative patients were evaluated at the end of the FU. Mean time of FU for single row was 3.2 years (2-4.1) and for TOE was 3.5 years (2.4-3). Mean age for SR patients was 71.15 years (70-82) and for TOE was 74.8 years (70-81). We were able to evaluate 20 pairs of patients (15 pairs of females and five pairs of males).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CS differed in both groups of patients. Patients operated on with TOE had a better, but non-significant CS 81.3 (TOE) versus 75.7 (SR) p > 0.05. The patients operated own with TOE showed statistically significant better arm abduction strength than patients operated on with SR (p < 0.05). There was a trend for patients operated on with TOE to have a better ROM and less pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of our work show that patients older than 70 years old, with repairable RCT operated on with a transosseous equivalent, have a trend to have a better CS and a significantly better strength than patients operated on with SR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50484,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":"4099-4104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A match-pair analysis of single row vs transosseous equivalent double row in massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients > 70 years old.\",\"authors\":\"Christos Koukos, Vasileios Giannatos, Andreas Panagopoulos, Zinon Kokkalis, David Latz, Kerem Bilsel, Arrigoni Paolo, Fredy Montoya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00590-024-04113-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the results of single versus double row (TEO) in massive tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff in patients older than 70 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between October 2019 and July 2022, 46 patients, older than 70 years old, were operated on, in two centers, by one surgeon (FM), in one center, we performed a single-row repair, while in the other a double row, transosseous equivalent. Patients were paired by age and gender. All patients were studied with a preoperative MRI along with preoperative age and gender adjusted constant score. Postoperative patients were evaluated at the end of the FU. Mean time of FU for single row was 3.2 years (2-4.1) and for TOE was 3.5 years (2.4-3). Mean age for SR patients was 71.15 years (70-82) and for TOE was 74.8 years (70-81). We were able to evaluate 20 pairs of patients (15 pairs of females and five pairs of males).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CS differed in both groups of patients. Patients operated on with TOE had a better, but non-significant CS 81.3 (TOE) versus 75.7 (SR) p > 0.05. The patients operated own with TOE showed statistically significant better arm abduction strength than patients operated on with SR (p < 0.05). There was a trend for patients operated on with TOE to have a better ROM and less pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of our work show that patients older than 70 years old, with repairable RCT operated on with a transosseous equivalent, have a trend to have a better CS and a significantly better strength than patients operated on with SR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4099-4104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04113-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04113-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言本研究旨在比较单排与双排(TEO)对70岁以上肩袖后上方大面积撕裂患者的治疗效果:在2019年10月至2022年7月期间,由一位外科医生(FM)在两个中心为46名70岁以上的患者进行了手术。在一个中心,我们进行了单排修复,而在另一个中心,我们进行了双排、经骨等效修复。患者按年龄和性别配对。所有患者在术前都接受了磁共振成像检查,并进行了术前年龄和性别恒定评分调整。术后患者在 FU 结束时接受评估。单排患者的平均治疗时间为 3.2 年(2-4.1 年),TOE 患者的平均治疗时间为 3.5 年(2.4-3 年)。SR患者的平均年龄为71.15岁(70-82岁),TOE患者的平均年龄为74.8岁(70-81岁)。我们对 20 对患者(15 对女性和 5 对男性)进行了评估:两组患者的 CS 均有所不同。TOE手术患者的CS值为81.3(TOE)对75.7(SR),P > 0.05。采用 TOE 手术的患者的手臂外展力量明显优于采用 SR 手术的患者(P):我们的研究结果表明,70 岁以上的可修复 RCT 患者在接受经骨等位手术后,其 CS 和力量明显优于接受 SR 手术的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A match-pair analysis of single row vs transosseous equivalent double row in massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients > 70 years old.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the results of single versus double row (TEO) in massive tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff in patients older than 70 years old.

Methods: Between October 2019 and July 2022, 46 patients, older than 70 years old, were operated on, in two centers, by one surgeon (FM), in one center, we performed a single-row repair, while in the other a double row, transosseous equivalent. Patients were paired by age and gender. All patients were studied with a preoperative MRI along with preoperative age and gender adjusted constant score. Postoperative patients were evaluated at the end of the FU. Mean time of FU for single row was 3.2 years (2-4.1) and for TOE was 3.5 years (2.4-3). Mean age for SR patients was 71.15 years (70-82) and for TOE was 74.8 years (70-81). We were able to evaluate 20 pairs of patients (15 pairs of females and five pairs of males).

Results: CS differed in both groups of patients. Patients operated on with TOE had a better, but non-significant CS 81.3 (TOE) versus 75.7 (SR) p > 0.05. The patients operated own with TOE showed statistically significant better arm abduction strength than patients operated on with SR (p < 0.05). There was a trend for patients operated on with TOE to have a better ROM and less pain.

Discussion: The results of our work show that patients older than 70 years old, with repairable RCT operated on with a transosseous equivalent, have a trend to have a better CS and a significantly better strength than patients operated on with SR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology (EJOST) aims to publish high quality Orthopedic scientific work. The objective of our journal is to disseminate meaningful, impactful, clinically relevant work from each and every region of the world, that has the potential to change and or inform clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信