腘绳肌损伤风险因素脆性指数。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Matthew Anthis, Stephanie Gourd, Brian Kim, Joshua D Ruddy, Rod Whiteley, Ryan Timmins, Nirav Maniar, Jack Hickey, David A Opar
{"title":"腘绳肌损伤风险因素脆性指数。","authors":"Matthew Anthis, Stephanie Gourd, Brian Kim, Joshua D Ruddy, Rod Whiteley, Ryan Timmins, Nirav Maniar, Jack Hickey, David A Opar","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To determine the Fragility Index of hamstring injury risk factors, defined as the minimum number of participants who would need to change classification to make a hamstring injury risk factor statistically nonsignificant. <b>DESIGN:</b> Retrospective secondary data analysis. <b>METHODS:</b> Studies that investigated 1 or more risk factors for hamstring injury, and presented sufficient data to develop a 2 × 2 contingency table were included. A systematic literature search and reference screening of a recent hamstring injury systematic review were conducted to identify 78 articles. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals were determined and then systematically recalculated by removing 1 observation from the high-risk injury count and adding it to the high-risk noninjury count. The Fragility Index for a risk factor was the number of observations required to be moved between groups until the relative risk was no longer significant. <b>RESULTS:</b> The median Fragility Index of all hamstring injury risk factors was 3 (Q1-Q3 = 2-6). The Fragility Index for nonmodifiable risk factors was 3 (Q1-Q3 = 2-6) and 3 (Q1-Q3 = 2-5) for modifiable risk factors. Over 35% of all included hamstring injury risk factors had a Fragility Index of ≤2. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Most statistically significant hamstring injury risk factors are fragile associations. The interpretation of significant hamstring injury risk factors should consider a range of statistical metrics, and while the Fragility Index should never be considered in isolation, it is an intuitive measure to help assess the robustness of findings. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):672-678. Epub 4 September 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12300</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"54 10","pages":"672-678"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fragility Index of Risk Factors for Hamstring Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Anthis, Stephanie Gourd, Brian Kim, Joshua D Ruddy, Rod Whiteley, Ryan Timmins, Nirav Maniar, Jack Hickey, David A Opar\",\"doi\":\"10.2519/jospt.2024.12300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To determine the Fragility Index of hamstring injury risk factors, defined as the minimum number of participants who would need to change classification to make a hamstring injury risk factor statistically nonsignificant. <b>DESIGN:</b> Retrospective secondary data analysis. <b>METHODS:</b> Studies that investigated 1 or more risk factors for hamstring injury, and presented sufficient data to develop a 2 × 2 contingency table were included. A systematic literature search and reference screening of a recent hamstring injury systematic review were conducted to identify 78 articles. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals were determined and then systematically recalculated by removing 1 observation from the high-risk injury count and adding it to the high-risk noninjury count. The Fragility Index for a risk factor was the number of observations required to be moved between groups until the relative risk was no longer significant. <b>RESULTS:</b> The median Fragility Index of all hamstring injury risk factors was 3 (Q1-Q3 = 2-6). The Fragility Index for nonmodifiable risk factors was 3 (Q1-Q3 = 2-6) and 3 (Q1-Q3 = 2-5) for modifiable risk factors. Over 35% of all included hamstring injury risk factors had a Fragility Index of ≤2. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Most statistically significant hamstring injury risk factors are fragile associations. The interpretation of significant hamstring injury risk factors should consider a range of statistical metrics, and while the Fragility Index should never be considered in isolation, it is an intuitive measure to help assess the robustness of findings. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):672-678. Epub 4 September 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12300</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"54 10\",\"pages\":\"672-678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12300\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12300","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定腘绳肌损伤风险因素的脆性指数,该指数定义为需要改变分类才能使腘绳肌损伤风险因素在统计学上不显著的最少参与者人数。设计:回顾性二手数据分析。方法:纳入调查 1 个或 1 个以上腿筋损伤风险因素的研究,并提供足够的数据以编制 2 × 2 或然率表。通过系统性文献检索和对近期一篇腿筋损伤系统性综述的参考文献筛选,确定了 78 篇文章。确定了相对风险和 95% 置信区间,然后通过从高风险损伤计数中移除 1 个观察值并将其添加到高风险非损伤计数中,系统地重新计算了相对风险和 95% 置信区间。风险因素的脆性指数是在组间移动直至相对风险不再显著时所需的观察值数量。结果:所有腿筋损伤风险因素的脆性指数中位数为 3(Q1-Q3 = 2-6)。不可改变风险因素的脆性指数为 3(Q1-Q3 = 2-6),可改变风险因素的脆性指数为 3(Q1-Q3 = 2-5)。在所有纳入的腿筋损伤风险因素中,超过 35% 的脆性指数≤2。结论:大多数具有统计学意义的腿筋损伤风险因素都是脆弱关联。对重要腿筋损伤风险因素的解释应考虑一系列统计指标,虽然绝不能孤立地考虑脆性指数,但它是一种直观的测量方法,有助于评估研究结果的稳健性。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):672-678.doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12300。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Fragility Index of Risk Factors for Hamstring Injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the Fragility Index of hamstring injury risk factors, defined as the minimum number of participants who would need to change classification to make a hamstring injury risk factor statistically nonsignificant. DESIGN: Retrospective secondary data analysis. METHODS: Studies that investigated 1 or more risk factors for hamstring injury, and presented sufficient data to develop a 2 × 2 contingency table were included. A systematic literature search and reference screening of a recent hamstring injury systematic review were conducted to identify 78 articles. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals were determined and then systematically recalculated by removing 1 observation from the high-risk injury count and adding it to the high-risk noninjury count. The Fragility Index for a risk factor was the number of observations required to be moved between groups until the relative risk was no longer significant. RESULTS: The median Fragility Index of all hamstring injury risk factors was 3 (Q1-Q3 = 2-6). The Fragility Index for nonmodifiable risk factors was 3 (Q1-Q3 = 2-6) and 3 (Q1-Q3 = 2-5) for modifiable risk factors. Over 35% of all included hamstring injury risk factors had a Fragility Index of ≤2. CONCLUSION: Most statistically significant hamstring injury risk factors are fragile associations. The interpretation of significant hamstring injury risk factors should consider a range of statistical metrics, and while the Fragility Index should never be considered in isolation, it is an intuitive measure to help assess the robustness of findings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(10):672-678. Epub 4 September 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12300.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信