Does Use of GLP-1 Agonists Increase Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Background: Amidst the rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity among individuals undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), the impact of glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) therapy on surgical outcomes merits thorough investigation. Though it is known that GLP-1 therapy poses an interesting challenge for anesthesia during the perioperative period, little is known regarding the effects of these medications on surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of GLP-1 on postoperative outcomes and length of stay (LOS) in T2DM patients undergoing TSA.

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using a national database to identify primary TSA patients aged 18 and above with T2DM prescribed GLP-1 therapy at the time of surgery. Exclusion criteria included revision surgery, TSA for fracture, type 1 diabetes, steroid-induced diabetes, and contraindications for GLP-1 therapy. A control group of T2DM TSA patients not on GLP-1 therapy was used, and a 1:4 propensity-score match was performed. Incidence rates and odds ratios (OR) via multivariable logistic regression were calculated. The primary outcomes were 90-day major medical complications and LOS. Secondary outcomes included 2-year joint-related complications.

Results: In the 90-day follow-up cohort, 64,567 patients met inclusion criteria, with 8,481 (13.1%) on GLP-1 therapy. No significant increase in 90-day major complications, including DVT, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, hypoglycemic event, sepsis, or readmission, was found between GLP-1 and non-GLP-1 cohorts after multivariable logistic regression. In the 2-year follow-up cohort, 47,814 patients were included, with 5,969 (12.5%) on GLP-1 therapy. Similarly, 2-year joint-related complications, including all-cause revision, prosthetic joint infection, periprosthetic fracture, and aseptic revision, showed no significant differences between the GLP-1 and non-GLP-1 cohorts. No significant difference was observed in LOS in the 90-day cohort.

Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of GLP-1 therapy's impact on TSA outcomes, revealing no significant change in postoperative complications or LOS. The lack of increased postoperative risk underscores the potential of GLP-1 therapy in managing T2DM without adverse effects on TSA recovery. These insights contribute to understanding postoperative management in orthopedic surgery, indicating that we did not note any increased risk with GLP-1 use perioperatively in TSA patients, unlike in other populations like the TKA patients. Future research should focus on prospective analyses to further elucidate the role of GLP-1 therapy in surgical outcomes, aiming to enhance patient care and optimize postoperative strategies for T2DM patients undergoing TSA.