用于牙科颜色测量的不同手机应用软件的重复性。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anh Duong Dang, Donald M Belles, Maria D Gonzalez, Ruth A Aponte-Wesson, Rade D Paravina
{"title":"用于牙科颜色测量的不同手机应用软件的重复性。","authors":"Anh Duong Dang, Donald M Belles, Maria D Gonzalez, Ruth A Aponte-Wesson, Rade D Paravina","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the repeatability of various color-measuring mobile phone applications (MPAs) on dental materials in clinically relevant shades in 1-mm thickness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A benchtop spectrophotometer was used as a reference instrument. Seven MPAs were used: Color Analysis, Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe, Color Grab, and Colorimeter from Android, and Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe, ColorMeter RGB, and Optishade from iOS. Color measurements were performed on 1-mm thickness slices of CAD-CAM materials, Vita Enamic shades 1M2, 2M2, 3M2, 4M2, and Vitablocs Mark II shades A1C, A2C, A3C, A4C (n = 10, for a total 80 specimens). The specimens were measured at three time periods, Day 0, Day 1, and Day 7, and three measurements were made on each day, to mimic short-, medium-, and long-term repeatability. The color differences were analyzed using the CIEDE2000 formula, with the corresponding color difference (ΔE<sub>00</sub>), and mean color difference from the mean (MCDM<sub>00</sub>). One-way ANOVA, Repeated measures ANOVA, and Paired sample t-tests were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optishade from iOS showed the lowest mean color difference among the MPAs (ΔE<sub>00 </sub>= 0.2 (SD 0.1), 0.3 (SD 0.2), and 0.2 (SD 0.1) at Day 0, 1, and 7, respectively, and ΔE<sub>00 </sub>= 0.5 (SD 0.3) for all three periods Days 0-1, 0-7, and 1-7). Material-dependent variations in the repeatability of color measurements were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference among color measurements using MPAs and a spectrophotometer, among the MPAs, and materials. The spectrophotometer exhibited the highest repeatability across the tested time periods. The iOS Optishade showed the highest repeatability among the MPAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeatability of different mobile phone applications for color measurement in dentistry.\",\"authors\":\"Anh Duong Dang, Donald M Belles, Maria D Gonzalez, Ruth A Aponte-Wesson, Rade D Paravina\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.13959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the repeatability of various color-measuring mobile phone applications (MPAs) on dental materials in clinically relevant shades in 1-mm thickness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A benchtop spectrophotometer was used as a reference instrument. Seven MPAs were used: Color Analysis, Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe, Color Grab, and Colorimeter from Android, and Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe, ColorMeter RGB, and Optishade from iOS. Color measurements were performed on 1-mm thickness slices of CAD-CAM materials, Vita Enamic shades 1M2, 2M2, 3M2, 4M2, and Vitablocs Mark II shades A1C, A2C, A3C, A4C (n = 10, for a total 80 specimens). The specimens were measured at three time periods, Day 0, Day 1, and Day 7, and three measurements were made on each day, to mimic short-, medium-, and long-term repeatability. The color differences were analyzed using the CIEDE2000 formula, with the corresponding color difference (ΔE<sub>00</sub>), and mean color difference from the mean (MCDM<sub>00</sub>). One-way ANOVA, Repeated measures ANOVA, and Paired sample t-tests were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optishade from iOS showed the lowest mean color difference among the MPAs (ΔE<sub>00 </sub>= 0.2 (SD 0.1), 0.3 (SD 0.2), and 0.2 (SD 0.1) at Day 0, 1, and 7, respectively, and ΔE<sub>00 </sub>= 0.5 (SD 0.3) for all three periods Days 0-1, 0-7, and 1-7). Material-dependent variations in the repeatability of color measurements were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference among color measurements using MPAs and a spectrophotometer, among the MPAs, and materials. The spectrophotometer exhibited the highest repeatability across the tested time periods. The iOS Optishade showed the highest repeatability among the MPAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13959\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估各种颜色测量手机应用(MPA)在牙科材料上的可重复性,以 1 毫米厚度的临床相关色调为标准:使用台式分光光度计作为参照仪器。使用了七种 MPA:安卓系统中使用了 Color Analysis、Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe、Color Grab 和 Colorimeter,iOS 系统中使用了 Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe、ColorMeter RGB 和 Optishade。颜色测量是在 1 毫米厚的 CAD-CAM 材料切片上进行的,这些材料包括 Vita Enamic 色调 1M2、2M2、3M2、4M2 和 Vitablocs Mark II 色调 A1C、A2C、A3C、A4C(n = 10,共 80 个试样)。试样在第 0 天、第 1 天和第 7 天三个时间段进行测量,每天测量三次,以模拟短期、中期和长期的重复性。使用 CIEDE2000 公式分析色差,得出相应的色差(ΔE00)和与平均值的平均色差(MCDM00)。统计分析采用了单因素方差分析、重复测量方差分析和配对样本 t 检验:结果:在所有 MPA 中,iOS 的光罩平均色差最小(在第 0、1 和 7 天分别为 ΔE00 = 0.2 (SD 0.1)、0.3 (SD 0.2) 和 0.2 (SD 0.1),而在第 0-1、0-7 和 1-7 天的所有三个时段中,ΔE00 = 0.5 (SD 0.3))。颜色测量的重复性随材料而变化:使用 MPA 和分光光度计进行的颜色测量之间、MPA 之间以及材料之间存在着显著的统计学差异。分光光度计在测试时间段内的重复性最高。在 MPA 中,iOS Optishade 的重复性最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeatability of different mobile phone applications for color measurement in dentistry.

Purpose: To assess the repeatability of various color-measuring mobile phone applications (MPAs) on dental materials in clinically relevant shades in 1-mm thickness.

Materials and methods: A benchtop spectrophotometer was used as a reference instrument. Seven MPAs were used: Color Analysis, Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe, Color Grab, and Colorimeter from Android, and Color Analyzer-Iro Shirabe, ColorMeter RGB, and Optishade from iOS. Color measurements were performed on 1-mm thickness slices of CAD-CAM materials, Vita Enamic shades 1M2, 2M2, 3M2, 4M2, and Vitablocs Mark II shades A1C, A2C, A3C, A4C (n = 10, for a total 80 specimens). The specimens were measured at three time periods, Day 0, Day 1, and Day 7, and three measurements were made on each day, to mimic short-, medium-, and long-term repeatability. The color differences were analyzed using the CIEDE2000 formula, with the corresponding color difference (ΔE00), and mean color difference from the mean (MCDM00). One-way ANOVA, Repeated measures ANOVA, and Paired sample t-tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Optishade from iOS showed the lowest mean color difference among the MPAs (ΔE00 = 0.2 (SD 0.1), 0.3 (SD 0.2), and 0.2 (SD 0.1) at Day 0, 1, and 7, respectively, and ΔE00 = 0.5 (SD 0.3) for all three periods Days 0-1, 0-7, and 1-7). Material-dependent variations in the repeatability of color measurements were observed.

Conclusion: There was a statistically significant difference among color measurements using MPAs and a spectrophotometer, among the MPAs, and materials. The spectrophotometer exhibited the highest repeatability across the tested time periods. The iOS Optishade showed the highest repeatability among the MPAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信