英国社区急救人员计划的创新和未来方向共识:全国名义小组技术研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Gupteswar Patel, Vanessa Botan, Viet-Hai Phung, Ian Trueman, Mehrshad Parvin Hosseini, Murray D Smith, Roderick Ørner, Julie Pattinson, Zahid Asghar, Elise Rowan, Robert Spaight, Craig Mortimer, Amanda Brewster, Pauline Mountain, Joshua Miller, Martina Brown, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
{"title":"英国社区急救人员计划的创新和未来方向共识:全国名义小组技术研究。","authors":"Gupteswar Patel, Vanessa Botan, Viet-Hai Phung, Ian Trueman, Mehrshad Parvin Hosseini, Murray D Smith, Roderick Ørner, Julie Pattinson, Zahid Asghar, Elise Rowan, Robert Spaight, Craig Mortimer, Amanda Brewster, Pauline Mountain, Joshua Miller, Martina Brown, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01254-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to achieve consensus among NHS and community stakeholders to identify and prioritise innovations in Community First Responder (CFR) schemes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study, adopting a modified nominal group technique with participants from ambulance services, CFR schemes and community stakeholders. The 1-day consensus workshop consisted of four sessions: introduction of innovations derived from primary research; round-robin discussions to generate new ideas; discussion and ranking of innovations; feedback of ranking, re-ranking and concluding statements. Innovations were ranked on a 5-point Likert scale and descriptive statistics of median and interquartile range calculated. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The innovations found were classified into two categories: process innovations and technological innovations. The process innovations included six types of innovations: roles, governance, training, policies and protocols, recruitment, and awareness. The technological innovations included three aspects: information and communication; transport; and health technology. The descriptive statistics revealed that innovations such as counselling and support for CFRs (median: 5 IQR 5,5), peer support [5 (4,5)], and enhanced communication with control room [5 (4,5)] were essential priorities. Contrastingly, innovations such as the provision of dual CFR crew [1.5 (1,3)], CFR responsibilities in patient transport to hospital [1 (1,2)], and CFR access to emergency blue light [1 (1,1.5)] were deemed non-priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article established consensus on innovations in the CFR schemes and their ranking for improving the provision of care delivered by CFRs in communities. The consensus-building process also informed policy- and decision-makers on the potential future change agenda for CFR schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus on innovations and future directions of community first responder schemes in United Kingdom: a national nominal group technique study.\",\"authors\":\"Gupteswar Patel, Vanessa Botan, Viet-Hai Phung, Ian Trueman, Mehrshad Parvin Hosseini, Murray D Smith, Roderick Ørner, Julie Pattinson, Zahid Asghar, Elise Rowan, Robert Spaight, Craig Mortimer, Amanda Brewster, Pauline Mountain, Joshua Miller, Martina Brown, Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13049-024-01254-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to achieve consensus among NHS and community stakeholders to identify and prioritise innovations in Community First Responder (CFR) schemes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods study, adopting a modified nominal group technique with participants from ambulance services, CFR schemes and community stakeholders. The 1-day consensus workshop consisted of four sessions: introduction of innovations derived from primary research; round-robin discussions to generate new ideas; discussion and ranking of innovations; feedback of ranking, re-ranking and concluding statements. Innovations were ranked on a 5-point Likert scale and descriptive statistics of median and interquartile range calculated. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The innovations found were classified into two categories: process innovations and technological innovations. The process innovations included six types of innovations: roles, governance, training, policies and protocols, recruitment, and awareness. The technological innovations included three aspects: information and communication; transport; and health technology. The descriptive statistics revealed that innovations such as counselling and support for CFRs (median: 5 IQR 5,5), peer support [5 (4,5)], and enhanced communication with control room [5 (4,5)] were essential priorities. Contrastingly, innovations such as the provision of dual CFR crew [1.5 (1,3)], CFR responsibilities in patient transport to hospital [1 (1,2)], and CFR access to emergency blue light [1 (1,1.5)] were deemed non-priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article established consensus on innovations in the CFR schemes and their ranking for improving the provision of care delivered by CFRs in communities. The consensus-building process also informed policy- and decision-makers on the potential future change agenda for CFR schemes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01254-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01254-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目标是在国家医疗服务系统(NHS)和社区利益相关者之间达成共识,以确定社区第一响应者(CFR)计划的创新之处并将其列为优先事项:我们开展了一项混合方法研究,采用改良的名义小组技术,参与者包括救护车服务机构、社区急救人员计划和社区利益相关者。为期一天的共识研讨会由四个环节组成:介绍源于初级研究的创新;循环讨论以产生新想法;讨论并对创新进行排序;排序反馈、重新排序和总结发言。创新以 5 分李克特量表进行排序,并计算中位数和四分位数之间的描述性统计。对讨论进行了记录、转录和专题分析:结果:发现的创新分为两类:流程创新和技术创新。流程创新包括六类:角色、管理、培训、政策和规程、招聘和意识。技术创新包括三个方面:信息和通信;运输;卫生技术。描述性统计显示,为社区康复人员提供咨询和支持(中位数:5 IQR 5,5)、同伴支持[5 (4,5)]、加强与控制室的沟通[5 (4,5)]等创新是基本优先事项。与此形成鲜明对比的是,提供双 CFR 人员[1.5 (1,3)]、CFR 负责将患者送往医院[1 (1,2)]、CFR 使用应急蓝灯[1 (1,1.5)]等创新措施被视为非优先事项:本文就社区康复中心计划的创新及其在改善社区康复中心提供的护理服务方面的排名达成了共识。建立共识的过程还让政策制定者和决策者了解了社区康复中心计划未来可能的变革议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus on innovations and future directions of community first responder schemes in United Kingdom: a national nominal group technique study.

Aim: We aimed to achieve consensus among NHS and community stakeholders to identify and prioritise innovations in Community First Responder (CFR) schemes.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study, adopting a modified nominal group technique with participants from ambulance services, CFR schemes and community stakeholders. The 1-day consensus workshop consisted of four sessions: introduction of innovations derived from primary research; round-robin discussions to generate new ideas; discussion and ranking of innovations; feedback of ranking, re-ranking and concluding statements. Innovations were ranked on a 5-point Likert scale and descriptive statistics of median and interquartile range calculated. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically.

Results: The innovations found were classified into two categories: process innovations and technological innovations. The process innovations included six types of innovations: roles, governance, training, policies and protocols, recruitment, and awareness. The technological innovations included three aspects: information and communication; transport; and health technology. The descriptive statistics revealed that innovations such as counselling and support for CFRs (median: 5 IQR 5,5), peer support [5 (4,5)], and enhanced communication with control room [5 (4,5)] were essential priorities. Contrastingly, innovations such as the provision of dual CFR crew [1.5 (1,3)], CFR responsibilities in patient transport to hospital [1 (1,2)], and CFR access to emergency blue light [1 (1,1.5)] were deemed non-priorities.

Conclusions: This article established consensus on innovations in the CFR schemes and their ranking for improving the provision of care delivered by CFRs in communities. The consensus-building process also informed policy- and decision-makers on the potential future change agenda for CFR schemes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信