在英格兰和威尔士,种族对髋部骨折后的护理和治疗效果的影响。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Sohail Nisar, Jonathan Lamb, Antony Johansen, Robert West, Hemant Pandit
{"title":"在英格兰和威尔士,种族对髋部骨折后的护理和治疗效果的影响。","authors":"Sohail Nisar, Jonathan Lamb, Antony Johansen, Robert West, Hemant Pandit","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0217.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine if patient ethnicity among patients with a hip fracture influences the type of fracture, surgical care, and outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational cohort study using a linked dataset combining data from the National Hip Fracture Database and Hospital Episode Statistics in England and Wales. Patients' odds of dying at one year were modelled using logistic regression with adjustment for ethnicity and clinically relevant covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 563,640 patients were included between 1 April 2011 and 1 October 2020. Of these, 476,469 (85%) had a coded ethnicity for analysis. Non-white patients tended to be younger (mean 81.2 vs 83.0 years), and were more commonly male (34.9% vs 28.5%; p < 0.001). They were less likely to be admitted from institutional care (12.9% vs 21.8%; p < 0.001), to have normal cognition (53.3% vs 62.0%; p < 0.001), and to be free of comorbidities (22.0% vs 26.8%; p < 0.001), but were more likely to be from the most deprived areas (29.4% vs 17.3%; p < 0.001). Non-white patients were more likely to experience delay to surgery for medical reasons (14.8% vs 12.7%; p < 0.001), more likely to be treated with an intramedullary nail or a sliding hip screw (52.5% vs 45.1%; p < 0.001), and less likely to be mobilized by the day after surgery (74.3% vs 79.0%; p < 0.001). Mortality was higher among non-white inpatients (9.2% vs 8.4% for white), but was lower at one year after hip fracture (26.6% vs 30.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified serious problems with the quality of NHS ethnicity data. Despite this, we have shown that there is complex variation in case-mix and hip fracture morphology between ethnic groups. We have also identified variations in care received between ethnic groups, and that disparities in healthcare may contribute to poorer outcome. Inpatient mortality is higher in non-white patients, although this finding reverses after discharge, and one-year mortality is lower. Patients from ethnic minority backgrounds experience disparities in healthcare, however at one year postoperatively non-white patients have a statistically significant lower mortality after controlling for relevant clinical covariates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1182-1189"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of ethnicity on care and outcome after hip fracture in England and Wales.\",\"authors\":\"Sohail Nisar, Jonathan Lamb, Antony Johansen, Robert West, Hemant Pandit\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0217.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine if patient ethnicity among patients with a hip fracture influences the type of fracture, surgical care, and outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational cohort study using a linked dataset combining data from the National Hip Fracture Database and Hospital Episode Statistics in England and Wales. Patients' odds of dying at one year were modelled using logistic regression with adjustment for ethnicity and clinically relevant covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 563,640 patients were included between 1 April 2011 and 1 October 2020. Of these, 476,469 (85%) had a coded ethnicity for analysis. Non-white patients tended to be younger (mean 81.2 vs 83.0 years), and were more commonly male (34.9% vs 28.5%; p < 0.001). They were less likely to be admitted from institutional care (12.9% vs 21.8%; p < 0.001), to have normal cognition (53.3% vs 62.0%; p < 0.001), and to be free of comorbidities (22.0% vs 26.8%; p < 0.001), but were more likely to be from the most deprived areas (29.4% vs 17.3%; p < 0.001). Non-white patients were more likely to experience delay to surgery for medical reasons (14.8% vs 12.7%; p < 0.001), more likely to be treated with an intramedullary nail or a sliding hip screw (52.5% vs 45.1%; p < 0.001), and less likely to be mobilized by the day after surgery (74.3% vs 79.0%; p < 0.001). Mortality was higher among non-white inpatients (9.2% vs 8.4% for white), but was lower at one year after hip fracture (26.6% vs 30.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified serious problems with the quality of NHS ethnicity data. Despite this, we have shown that there is complex variation in case-mix and hip fracture morphology between ethnic groups. We have also identified variations in care received between ethnic groups, and that disparities in healthcare may contribute to poorer outcome. Inpatient mortality is higher in non-white patients, although this finding reverses after discharge, and one-year mortality is lower. Patients from ethnic minority backgrounds experience disparities in healthcare, however at one year postoperatively non-white patients have a statistically significant lower mortality after controlling for relevant clinical covariates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"106-B 10\",\"pages\":\"1182-1189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0217.R1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0217.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定髋部骨折患者的种族是否会影响骨折类型、手术治疗和预后:这是一项观察性队列研究,使用的是英格兰和威尔士国家髋部骨折数据库和医院病历统计的链接数据集。采用逻辑回归法对患者一年后死亡的几率进行建模,并对种族和临床相关协变量进行调整:结果:2011 年 4 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 1 日期间共纳入 563,640 名患者。其中,476,469 名患者(85%)的种族已编码,可用于分析。非白人患者往往更年轻(平均 81.2 岁对 83.0 岁),男性更常见(34.9% 对 28.5%;P < 0.001)。他们不太可能从住院治疗机构入院(12.9% vs 21.8%;P < 0.001),也不太可能认知正常(53.3% vs 62.0%;P < 0.001)和没有合并症(22.0% vs 26.8%;P < 0.001),但更有可能来自最贫困地区(29.4% vs 17.3%;P < 0.001)。非白人患者更有可能因医疗原因推迟手术(14.8% vs 12.7%;p < 0.001),更有可能使用髓内钉或滑动髋关节螺钉治疗(52.5% vs 45.1%;p < 0.001),术后第二天就能活动的可能性较小(74.3% vs 79.0%;p < 0.001)。非白人住院患者的死亡率较高(9.2% vs 8.4%),但髋部骨折术后一年的死亡率较低(26.6% vs 30.3%):我们的研究发现,英国国家医疗服务系统的种族数据质量存在严重问题。尽管如此,我们仍发现不同种族群体之间在病例组合和髋部骨折形态方面存在复杂的差异。我们还发现了不同种族群体在接受治疗方面的差异,而医疗保健方面的差异可能会导致较差的治疗效果。非白人患者的住院死亡率较高,但出院后这一结果会逆转,一年死亡率也较低。少数族裔背景的患者在医疗保健方面存在差异,但在控制了相关临床协变量后,非白人患者术后一年的死亡率在统计学上显著较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of ethnicity on care and outcome after hip fracture in England and Wales.

Aims: To determine if patient ethnicity among patients with a hip fracture influences the type of fracture, surgical care, and outcome.

Methods: This was an observational cohort study using a linked dataset combining data from the National Hip Fracture Database and Hospital Episode Statistics in England and Wales. Patients' odds of dying at one year were modelled using logistic regression with adjustment for ethnicity and clinically relevant covariates.

Results: A total of 563,640 patients were included between 1 April 2011 and 1 October 2020. Of these, 476,469 (85%) had a coded ethnicity for analysis. Non-white patients tended to be younger (mean 81.2 vs 83.0 years), and were more commonly male (34.9% vs 28.5%; p < 0.001). They were less likely to be admitted from institutional care (12.9% vs 21.8%; p < 0.001), to have normal cognition (53.3% vs 62.0%; p < 0.001), and to be free of comorbidities (22.0% vs 26.8%; p < 0.001), but were more likely to be from the most deprived areas (29.4% vs 17.3%; p < 0.001). Non-white patients were more likely to experience delay to surgery for medical reasons (14.8% vs 12.7%; p < 0.001), more likely to be treated with an intramedullary nail or a sliding hip screw (52.5% vs 45.1%; p < 0.001), and less likely to be mobilized by the day after surgery (74.3% vs 79.0%; p < 0.001). Mortality was higher among non-white inpatients (9.2% vs 8.4% for white), but was lower at one year after hip fracture (26.6% vs 30.3%).

Conclusion: Our study identified serious problems with the quality of NHS ethnicity data. Despite this, we have shown that there is complex variation in case-mix and hip fracture morphology between ethnic groups. We have also identified variations in care received between ethnic groups, and that disparities in healthcare may contribute to poorer outcome. Inpatient mortality is higher in non-white patients, although this finding reverses after discharge, and one-year mortality is lower. Patients from ethnic minority backgrounds experience disparities in healthcare, however at one year postoperatively non-white patients have a statistically significant lower mortality after controlling for relevant clinical covariates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信