无需全面参考校准的图像质量评估

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Paolo Giannitrapani, Elio D. Di Claudio , Giovanni Jacovitti
{"title":"无需全面参考校准的图像质量评估","authors":"Paolo Giannitrapani,&nbsp;Elio D. Di Claudio ,&nbsp;Giovanni Jacovitti","doi":"10.1016/j.image.2024.117212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Objective Image Quality Assessment (IQA) methods often lack of linearity of their quality estimates with respect to scores expressed by human subjects and therefore IQA metrics undergo a calibration process based on subjective quality examples. However, example-based training presents a challenge in terms of generalization hampering result comparison across different applications and operative conditions. In this paper, new Full Reference (FR) techniques, providing estimates linearly correlated with human scores without using calibration are introduced. We show that on natural images, application of estimation theory and psychophysical principles to images degraded by Gaussian blur leads to a so-called canonical IQA method, whose estimates are linearly correlated to both the subjective scores and the viewing distance. Then, we show that any mainstream IQA methods can be reconducted to the canonical method by converting its metric based on a unique specimen image. The proposed scheme is extended to wide classes of degraded images, e.g. noisy and compressed images. The resulting calibration-free FR IQA methods allows for comparability and interoperability across different imaging systems and on different viewing distances. A comparison of their statistical performance with respect to state-of-the-art calibration prone methods is finally provided, showing that the presented model is a valid alternative to the final 5-parameter calibration step of IQA methods, and the two parameters of the model have a clear operational meaning and are simply determined in practical applications. The enhanced performance are achieved across multiple viewing distance databases by independently realigning the blur values associated with each distance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49521,"journal":{"name":"Signal Processing-Image Communication","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 117212"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full-reference calibration-free image quality assessment\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Giannitrapani,&nbsp;Elio D. Di Claudio ,&nbsp;Giovanni Jacovitti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.image.2024.117212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Objective Image Quality Assessment (IQA) methods often lack of linearity of their quality estimates with respect to scores expressed by human subjects and therefore IQA metrics undergo a calibration process based on subjective quality examples. However, example-based training presents a challenge in terms of generalization hampering result comparison across different applications and operative conditions. In this paper, new Full Reference (FR) techniques, providing estimates linearly correlated with human scores without using calibration are introduced. We show that on natural images, application of estimation theory and psychophysical principles to images degraded by Gaussian blur leads to a so-called canonical IQA method, whose estimates are linearly correlated to both the subjective scores and the viewing distance. Then, we show that any mainstream IQA methods can be reconducted to the canonical method by converting its metric based on a unique specimen image. The proposed scheme is extended to wide classes of degraded images, e.g. noisy and compressed images. The resulting calibration-free FR IQA methods allows for comparability and interoperability across different imaging systems and on different viewing distances. A comparison of their statistical performance with respect to state-of-the-art calibration prone methods is finally provided, showing that the presented model is a valid alternative to the final 5-parameter calibration step of IQA methods, and the two parameters of the model have a clear operational meaning and are simply determined in practical applications. The enhanced performance are achieved across multiple viewing distance databases by independently realigning the blur values associated with each distance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signal Processing-Image Communication\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 117212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signal Processing-Image Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923596524001139\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signal Processing-Image Communication","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923596524001139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客观图像质量评估(IQA)方法的质量估计值往往与人类受试者的评分缺乏线性关系,因此 IQA 指标需要经过基于主观质量示例的校准过程。然而,基于示例的训练在通用性方面存在挑战,妨碍了不同应用和手术条件下的结果比较。本文介绍了新的完全参考(FR)技术,无需校准即可提供与人类评分线性相关的估计值。我们表明,在自然图像上,将估算理论和心理物理学原理应用于高斯模糊退化的图像,会产生一种所谓的典型 IQA 方法,其估算值与主观分数和观看距离均呈线性相关。然后,我们证明,任何主流的 IQA 方法都可以根据唯一的样本图像转换其度量标准,从而重新导入典型方法。所提出的方案可扩展到多种劣化图像,如噪声图像和压缩图像。由此产生的免校准 FR IQA 方法可在不同成像系统和不同观察距离上进行比较和互操作。最后提供了与最先进的易校准方法的统计性能比较,表明所提出的模型是 IQA 方法最后 5 参数校准步骤的有效替代方案,模型的两个参数具有明确的操作意义,在实际应用中只需简单确定。通过独立地重新调整与每个距离相关的模糊值,在多个视距数据库中实现了增强的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Full-reference calibration-free image quality assessment
Objective Image Quality Assessment (IQA) methods often lack of linearity of their quality estimates with respect to scores expressed by human subjects and therefore IQA metrics undergo a calibration process based on subjective quality examples. However, example-based training presents a challenge in terms of generalization hampering result comparison across different applications and operative conditions. In this paper, new Full Reference (FR) techniques, providing estimates linearly correlated with human scores without using calibration are introduced. We show that on natural images, application of estimation theory and psychophysical principles to images degraded by Gaussian blur leads to a so-called canonical IQA method, whose estimates are linearly correlated to both the subjective scores and the viewing distance. Then, we show that any mainstream IQA methods can be reconducted to the canonical method by converting its metric based on a unique specimen image. The proposed scheme is extended to wide classes of degraded images, e.g. noisy and compressed images. The resulting calibration-free FR IQA methods allows for comparability and interoperability across different imaging systems and on different viewing distances. A comparison of their statistical performance with respect to state-of-the-art calibration prone methods is finally provided, showing that the presented model is a valid alternative to the final 5-parameter calibration step of IQA methods, and the two parameters of the model have a clear operational meaning and are simply determined in practical applications. The enhanced performance are achieved across multiple viewing distance databases by independently realigning the blur values associated with each distance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Signal Processing-Image Communication
Signal Processing-Image Communication 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
138
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: Signal Processing: Image Communication is an international journal for the development of the theory and practice of image communication. Its primary objectives are the following: To present a forum for the advancement of theory and practice of image communication. To stimulate cross-fertilization between areas similar in nature which have traditionally been separated, for example, various aspects of visual communications and information systems. To contribute to a rapid information exchange between the industrial and academic environments. The editorial policy and the technical content of the journal are the responsibility of the Editor-in-Chief, the Area Editors and the Advisory Editors. The Journal is self-supporting from subscription income and contains a minimum amount of advertisements. Advertisements are subject to the prior approval of the Editor-in-Chief. The journal welcomes contributions from every country in the world. Signal Processing: Image Communication publishes articles relating to aspects of the design, implementation and use of image communication systems. The journal features original research work, tutorial and review articles, and accounts of practical developments. Subjects of interest include image/video coding, 3D video representations and compression, 3D graphics and animation compression, HDTV and 3DTV systems, video adaptation, video over IP, peer-to-peer video networking, interactive visual communication, multi-user video conferencing, wireless video broadcasting and communication, visual surveillance, 2D and 3D image/video quality measures, pre/post processing, video restoration and super-resolution, multi-camera video analysis, motion analysis, content-based image/video indexing and retrieval, face and gesture processing, video synthesis, 2D and 3D image/video acquisition and display technologies, architectures for image/video processing and communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信