兴敦河生态系统的物理化学和重金属污染水平:对公共健康风险评估的影响

IF 1.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Bhanu Pratap Singh, Palas Samanta, Moharana Choudhury, Piyush Gupta, Utkarsh Chadha, Tolera Kuma Eticha
{"title":"兴敦河生态系统的物理化学和重金属污染水平:对公共健康风险评估的影响","authors":"Bhanu Pratap Singh,&nbsp;Palas Samanta,&nbsp;Moharana Choudhury,&nbsp;Piyush Gupta,&nbsp;Utkarsh Chadha,&nbsp;Tolera Kuma Eticha","doi":"10.1002/tqem.22263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study was conducted to determine heavy metal contamination and physicochemical parameters in Hindon River's water. The parameters evaluated included cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), and lead (Pb), as well as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), turbidity (TUR), total dissolved solids (TDS), total hardness (TH), total alkalinity (TA), dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>), calcium (Ca), sulfate (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mtext>SO</mtext>\n <msup>\n <mn>4</mn>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mo>−</mo>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$ {\\text{SO}}_{{4}^{2-}} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) and nitrate (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mtext>NO</mtext>\n <msup>\n <mn>3</mn>\n <mo>−</mo>\n </msup>\n </msub>\n <annotation>$ {\\text{NO}}_{{3}^{-}} $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>). The findings showed the distribution of metals in river water. Some of the values of Cd, Cu, Cr, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Pb in surface water were above the standards set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The mean concentrations of physicochemical parameters in surface water sometimes exceeded the BIS standards due to untreated effluent discharge. All the Water Quality Index (WQI) values were above 100; therefore, the water was unsuitable for human consumption. The heavy metal pollution index (HPI) showed that Station 1 (S1) is the most polluted, followed by the S3 and S5. Multivariate statistical analysis showed that most heavy metals (HMs) in river water originated from artificial or anthropogenic sources, that is, human sources. The calculated hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) showed that the oral ingestion route could be dangerous to humans (both adults and children) since the HQ and HI values were higher than the acceptable limits (HQ &gt; 1). Dermal exposure assessment showed that the S1 was more dangerous to children's and adults' health than the S3 and S5. This trend showed that the Hindon River was polluted due to many untreated industrial effluents being discharged. The research highlights the pollution level in the Hindon River, and there is a need for proper monitoring and control to maintain the sustainability of the river ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":35327,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Quality Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tqem.22263","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physicochemical and heavy metal pollution level in Hindon River ecosystem: An implication to public health risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"Bhanu Pratap Singh,&nbsp;Palas Samanta,&nbsp;Moharana Choudhury,&nbsp;Piyush Gupta,&nbsp;Utkarsh Chadha,&nbsp;Tolera Kuma Eticha\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tqem.22263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study was conducted to determine heavy metal contamination and physicochemical parameters in Hindon River's water. The parameters evaluated included cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), and lead (Pb), as well as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), turbidity (TUR), total dissolved solids (TDS), total hardness (TH), total alkalinity (TA), dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>), calcium (Ca), sulfate (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mtext>SO</mtext>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>4</mn>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$ {\\\\text{SO}}_{{4}^{2-}} $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) and nitrate (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mtext>NO</mtext>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>3</mn>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n </msup>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>$ {\\\\text{NO}}_{{3}^{-}} $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>). The findings showed the distribution of metals in river water. Some of the values of Cd, Cu, Cr, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Pb in surface water were above the standards set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The mean concentrations of physicochemical parameters in surface water sometimes exceeded the BIS standards due to untreated effluent discharge. All the Water Quality Index (WQI) values were above 100; therefore, the water was unsuitable for human consumption. The heavy metal pollution index (HPI) showed that Station 1 (S1) is the most polluted, followed by the S3 and S5. Multivariate statistical analysis showed that most heavy metals (HMs) in river water originated from artificial or anthropogenic sources, that is, human sources. The calculated hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) showed that the oral ingestion route could be dangerous to humans (both adults and children) since the HQ and HI values were higher than the acceptable limits (HQ &gt; 1). Dermal exposure assessment showed that the S1 was more dangerous to children's and adults' health than the S3 and S5. This trend showed that the Hindon River was polluted due to many untreated industrial effluents being discharged. The research highlights the pollution level in the Hindon River, and there is a need for proper monitoring and control to maintain the sustainability of the river ecosystem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Quality Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tqem.22263\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.22263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.22263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在确定兴敦河水中的重金属污染和理化参数。评估的参数包括镉 (Cd)、铜 (Cu)、铬 (Cr)、铁 (Fe)、锰 (Mn)、锌 (Zn) 和铅 (Pb),以及 pH 值、电导率 (EC)、浊度 (TUR)、溶解固体总量 (TDS)、总硬度 (TH)、总碱度 (TA)、溶解氧 (DO)、生化需氧量 (BOD)、化学需氧量 (COD)、氯化物 (Cl-)、钙 (Ca)、硫酸盐 ( SO 4 2 - $ {text{SO}}_{4}^{2-}}}) 和硝酸盐 ( NO 3 - $ {text{SO}}_{4}^{2-}}})$ ) 和硝酸盐 ( NO 3 - $ {\{NO}}_{{3}^{-}} ) 。$ ).研究结果显示了河水中金属的分布情况。地表水中部分镉、铜、铬、铁、锰、锌和铅的含量超过了印度标准局(BIS)规定的标准。由于未经处理的污水排放,地表水中理化参数的平均浓度有时会超过印度标准局的标准。所有水质指数 (WQI) 值均超过 100;因此,这些水不适合人类饮用。重金属污染指数(HPI)显示,1 号站(S1)污染最严重,其次是 S3 和 S5。多元统计分析显示,河水中的重金属(HMs)大多来自人工或人为来源,即人类来源。计算得出的危害商数(HQ)和危害指数(HI)显示,口服途径可能对人体(包括成人和儿童)造成危害,因为 HQ 和 HI 值均高于可接受限值(HQ > 1)。皮肤接触评估显示,与 S3 和 S5 相比,S1 对儿童和成人的健康危害更大。这一趋势表明,由于排放了许多未经处理的工业废水,兴东河受到了污染。这项研究突显了兴敦河的污染程度,有必要进行适当的监测和控制,以保持河流生态系统的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Physicochemical and heavy metal pollution level in Hindon River ecosystem: An implication to public health risk assessment

Physicochemical and heavy metal pollution level in Hindon River ecosystem: An implication to public health risk assessment

The study was conducted to determine heavy metal contamination and physicochemical parameters in Hindon River's water. The parameters evaluated included cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), and lead (Pb), as well as pH, electrical conductivity (EC), turbidity (TUR), total dissolved solids (TDS), total hardness (TH), total alkalinity (TA), dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), chloride (Cl), calcium (Ca), sulfate ( SO 4 2 $ {\text{SO}}_{{4}^{2-}} $ ) and nitrate ( NO 3 $ {\text{NO}}_{{3}^{-}} $ ). The findings showed the distribution of metals in river water. Some of the values of Cd, Cu, Cr, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Pb in surface water were above the standards set by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). The mean concentrations of physicochemical parameters in surface water sometimes exceeded the BIS standards due to untreated effluent discharge. All the Water Quality Index (WQI) values were above 100; therefore, the water was unsuitable for human consumption. The heavy metal pollution index (HPI) showed that Station 1 (S1) is the most polluted, followed by the S3 and S5. Multivariate statistical analysis showed that most heavy metals (HMs) in river water originated from artificial or anthropogenic sources, that is, human sources. The calculated hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) showed that the oral ingestion route could be dangerous to humans (both adults and children) since the HQ and HI values were higher than the acceptable limits (HQ > 1). Dermal exposure assessment showed that the S1 was more dangerous to children's and adults' health than the S3 and S5. This trend showed that the Hindon River was polluted due to many untreated industrial effluents being discharged. The research highlights the pollution level in the Hindon River, and there is a need for proper monitoring and control to maintain the sustainability of the river ecosystem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Quality Management
Environmental Quality Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Four times a year, this practical journal shows you how to improve environmental performance and exceed voluntary standards such as ISO 14000. In each issue, you"ll find in-depth articles and the most current case studies of successful environmental quality improvement efforts -- and guidance on how you can apply these goals to your organization. Written by leading industry experts and practitioners, Environmental Quality Management brings you innovative practices in Performance Measurement...Life-Cycle Assessments...Safety Management... Environmental Auditing...ISO 14000 Standards and Certification..."Green Accounting"...Environmental Communication...Sustainable Development Issues...Environmental Benchmarking...Global Environmental Law and Regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信