9.多发性骨髓瘤 FISH 研究检测和报告的最佳实践:CGC 工作组的建议

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Xinyan Lu , Erica F. Andersen , Rahul Banerjee , Celeste C. Eno , Patrick R. Gonzales , Angela M. Lager , Patricia M. Miron , Trevor Pugh , Fabiola Quintero-Rivera , Virginia C. Thurston , Daynna J. Wolff , Jian Zhao , Linda B. Baughn
{"title":"9.多发性骨髓瘤 FISH 研究检测和报告的最佳实践:CGC 工作组的建议","authors":"Xinyan Lu ,&nbsp;Erica F. Andersen ,&nbsp;Rahul Banerjee ,&nbsp;Celeste C. Eno ,&nbsp;Patrick R. Gonzales ,&nbsp;Angela M. Lager ,&nbsp;Patricia M. Miron ,&nbsp;Trevor Pugh ,&nbsp;Fabiola Quintero-Rivera ,&nbsp;Virginia C. Thurston ,&nbsp;Daynna J. Wolff ,&nbsp;Jian Zhao ,&nbsp;Linda B. Baughn","doi":"10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy with recurrent primary and secondary cytogenetic abnormalities having prognostic and therapeutic implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold-standard assay to detect these genetic abnormalities. However, FISH testing for MM is heterogeneous among clinical laboratories, with differences in plasma cell isolation, FISH panel design, and reporting practices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The CGC Plasma Cell Neoplasm workgroup conducted a survey targeting the international MM clinician community on utilization of FISH and result reporting/interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 102 survey responses representing 14 countries. Most (74%) MM clinicians utilize their own in-house FISH testing service with 81% reporting plasma cell enrichment was performed by their lab. 90% of respondents desired FISH at diagnosis, 72% during disease progression and 40% for treatment/response assessment. The most-requested FISH probes included: TP53 (99%), t(4;14) (92%), 1q gain/amplification (91%), t(14;16) (90%), t(11;14) (85%), t(14;20) (76%), 1p deletion (67%), while FISH for ploidy status, deletion 13q/-13, t(6;14), MYC rearrangement, and other rare IG rearrangements were ranked lower in importance (10-50%). About 40% of respondents were dissatisfied with clarity, summary, and interpretation of FISH reports. When challenged to interpret a FISH report, only 2% of responders interpreted results correctly and the majority were either unsure or misinterpreted the report.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study showed that significant improvements are needed by clinical lab directors in MM FISH report clarity to benefit both the clinician and patient. We propose standardization of best MM FISH practices and reporting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49225,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Genetics","volume":"286 ","pages":"Pages S3-S4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"9. Best practices for testing and reporting of FISH studies in multiple myeloma: Recommendations from the CGC working group\",\"authors\":\"Xinyan Lu ,&nbsp;Erica F. Andersen ,&nbsp;Rahul Banerjee ,&nbsp;Celeste C. Eno ,&nbsp;Patrick R. Gonzales ,&nbsp;Angela M. Lager ,&nbsp;Patricia M. Miron ,&nbsp;Trevor Pugh ,&nbsp;Fabiola Quintero-Rivera ,&nbsp;Virginia C. Thurston ,&nbsp;Daynna J. Wolff ,&nbsp;Jian Zhao ,&nbsp;Linda B. Baughn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy with recurrent primary and secondary cytogenetic abnormalities having prognostic and therapeutic implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold-standard assay to detect these genetic abnormalities. However, FISH testing for MM is heterogeneous among clinical laboratories, with differences in plasma cell isolation, FISH panel design, and reporting practices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The CGC Plasma Cell Neoplasm workgroup conducted a survey targeting the international MM clinician community on utilization of FISH and result reporting/interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 102 survey responses representing 14 countries. Most (74%) MM clinicians utilize their own in-house FISH testing service with 81% reporting plasma cell enrichment was performed by their lab. 90% of respondents desired FISH at diagnosis, 72% during disease progression and 40% for treatment/response assessment. The most-requested FISH probes included: TP53 (99%), t(4;14) (92%), 1q gain/amplification (91%), t(14;16) (90%), t(11;14) (85%), t(14;20) (76%), 1p deletion (67%), while FISH for ploidy status, deletion 13q/-13, t(6;14), MYC rearrangement, and other rare IG rearrangements were ranked lower in importance (10-50%). About 40% of respondents were dissatisfied with clarity, summary, and interpretation of FISH reports. When challenged to interpret a FISH report, only 2% of responders interpreted results correctly and the majority were either unsure or misinterpreted the report.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study showed that significant improvements are needed by clinical lab directors in MM FISH report clarity to benefit both the clinician and patient. We propose standardization of best MM FISH practices and reporting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"volume\":\"286 \",\"pages\":\"Pages S3-S4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776224000498\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776224000498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)仍是一种无法治愈的浆细胞恶性肿瘤,其反复出现的原发性和继发性细胞遗传学异常对预后和治疗都有影响。荧光原位杂交(FISH)是检测这些基因异常的金标准检测方法。方法 CGC 浆细胞肿瘤工作组针对国际 MM 临床医生群体就 FISH 的使用和结果报告/解释进行了一项调查。大多数(74%)MM 临床医生使用自己的内部 FISH 检测服务,81% 的人报告说他们的实验室进行了血浆细胞富集。90%的受访者希望在诊断时进行FISH检测,72%的受访者希望在疾病进展期间进行FISH检测,40%的受访者希望在治疗/反应评估时进行FISH检测。最需要的 FISH 探针包括TP53(99%)、t(4;14)(92%)、1q 增益/扩增(91%)、t(14;16)(90%)、t(11;14)(85%)、t(14;20)(76%)、1p 缺失(67%),而倍性状态、13q/-13 缺失、t(6;14)、MYC 重排和其他罕见 IG 重排的 FISH 重要性较低(10-50%)。约 40% 的受访者对 FISH 报告的清晰度、摘要和解释不满意。结论我们的研究表明,临床实验室主任需要在 MM FISH 报告的清晰度方面做出重大改进,以使临床医生和患者都能从中受益。我们建议对 MM FISH 的最佳实践和报告进行标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
9. Best practices for testing and reporting of FISH studies in multiple myeloma: Recommendations from the CGC working group

Purpose

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable plasma cell malignancy with recurrent primary and secondary cytogenetic abnormalities having prognostic and therapeutic implications. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold-standard assay to detect these genetic abnormalities. However, FISH testing for MM is heterogeneous among clinical laboratories, with differences in plasma cell isolation, FISH panel design, and reporting practices.

Methods

The CGC Plasma Cell Neoplasm workgroup conducted a survey targeting the international MM clinician community on utilization of FISH and result reporting/interpretation.

Results

There were 102 survey responses representing 14 countries. Most (74%) MM clinicians utilize their own in-house FISH testing service with 81% reporting plasma cell enrichment was performed by their lab. 90% of respondents desired FISH at diagnosis, 72% during disease progression and 40% for treatment/response assessment. The most-requested FISH probes included: TP53 (99%), t(4;14) (92%), 1q gain/amplification (91%), t(14;16) (90%), t(11;14) (85%), t(14;20) (76%), 1p deletion (67%), while FISH for ploidy status, deletion 13q/-13, t(6;14), MYC rearrangement, and other rare IG rearrangements were ranked lower in importance (10-50%). About 40% of respondents were dissatisfied with clarity, summary, and interpretation of FISH reports. When challenged to interpret a FISH report, only 2% of responders interpreted results correctly and the majority were either unsure or misinterpreted the report.

Conclusion

Our study showed that significant improvements are needed by clinical lab directors in MM FISH report clarity to benefit both the clinician and patient. We propose standardization of best MM FISH practices and reporting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Genetics
Cancer Genetics ONCOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
167
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Cancer Genetics is to publish high quality scientific papers on the cellular, genetic and molecular aspects of cancer, including cancer predisposition and clinical diagnostic applications. Specific areas of interest include descriptions of new chromosomal, molecular or epigenetic alterations in benign and malignant diseases; novel laboratory approaches for identification and characterization of chromosomal rearrangements or genomic alterations in cancer cells; correlation of genetic changes with pathology and clinical presentation; and the molecular genetics of cancer predisposition. To reach a basic science and clinical multidisciplinary audience, we welcome original full-length articles, reviews, meeting summaries, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信