Xiaoyu Qu, Melissa Chiu, Serena Ruffino, Barrett Walker, Kate Kroeger, Min Fang
{"title":"29.肿瘤分子病理学检测的报销:2024 年的更新","authors":"Xiaoyu Qu, Melissa Chiu, Serena Ruffino, Barrett Walker, Kate Kroeger, Min Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chromosome genomic array testing (CGAT), targeted mutation NGS, and targeted RNA sequencing (TRS) are incorporated in the pathway testing scheme for hematologic disorders at our institution. Previously, we shared the reimbursement landscape of CGAT and mutation NGS for FY-17. Here we present an update for FY-18 to FY-23, encompassing CGAT (HCPCS 81406 and 81277), mutation NGS (81450 and 81455), and TRS (81455). Compared with FY-17, FY-18 to FY-23 showed improved percent of cases reimbursed for CGAT. Six-year average percentage of cases reimbursed showed 68% (yearly range: 58% to 80%) for CGAT, 74% (69% to 92%) for mutation NGS under 81450, and 76% (50% to 81%) for mutation NGS and TRS under 81455. The percentage of cases reimbursed varied between payers: CGAT/NGS had 82%/71% by commercial payers, 65%/70% by Medicaid, and 53%/83% by Medicare. The payer mix varied between years with the median payer percentage of commercial payers at 52% (45 to 57%), Medicare at 32% (25 to 45%), and Medicaid at 11% (7 to 15%). Out of 33 TRS studies billed, 20 cases were reimbursed (61%), including 9 out of 11 (82%) by commercial, 7 out of 14 (50%) by Medicare, and 4 out of 5 by Medicaid (80%). In conclusion, our assessment of percentage of claims receiving payment suggests improved reimbursement landscape for molecular assays over time with a trend showing more success with commercial payers than Medicare and Medicaid as well as higher percentage of cases being reimbursed for mutation NGS than for CGAT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49225,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Genetics","volume":"286 ","pages":"Pages S9-S10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"29. Reimbursement for molecular pathology testing for neoplasia: The 2024 update\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Qu, Melissa Chiu, Serena Ruffino, Barrett Walker, Kate Kroeger, Min Fang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Chromosome genomic array testing (CGAT), targeted mutation NGS, and targeted RNA sequencing (TRS) are incorporated in the pathway testing scheme for hematologic disorders at our institution. Previously, we shared the reimbursement landscape of CGAT and mutation NGS for FY-17. Here we present an update for FY-18 to FY-23, encompassing CGAT (HCPCS 81406 and 81277), mutation NGS (81450 and 81455), and TRS (81455). Compared with FY-17, FY-18 to FY-23 showed improved percent of cases reimbursed for CGAT. Six-year average percentage of cases reimbursed showed 68% (yearly range: 58% to 80%) for CGAT, 74% (69% to 92%) for mutation NGS under 81450, and 76% (50% to 81%) for mutation NGS and TRS under 81455. The percentage of cases reimbursed varied between payers: CGAT/NGS had 82%/71% by commercial payers, 65%/70% by Medicaid, and 53%/83% by Medicare. The payer mix varied between years with the median payer percentage of commercial payers at 52% (45 to 57%), Medicare at 32% (25 to 45%), and Medicaid at 11% (7 to 15%). Out of 33 TRS studies billed, 20 cases were reimbursed (61%), including 9 out of 11 (82%) by commercial, 7 out of 14 (50%) by Medicare, and 4 out of 5 by Medicaid (80%). In conclusion, our assessment of percentage of claims receiving payment suggests improved reimbursement landscape for molecular assays over time with a trend showing more success with commercial payers than Medicare and Medicaid as well as higher percentage of cases being reimbursed for mutation NGS than for CGAT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"volume\":\"286 \",\"pages\":\"Pages S9-S10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776224000693\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776224000693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
29. Reimbursement for molecular pathology testing for neoplasia: The 2024 update
Chromosome genomic array testing (CGAT), targeted mutation NGS, and targeted RNA sequencing (TRS) are incorporated in the pathway testing scheme for hematologic disorders at our institution. Previously, we shared the reimbursement landscape of CGAT and mutation NGS for FY-17. Here we present an update for FY-18 to FY-23, encompassing CGAT (HCPCS 81406 and 81277), mutation NGS (81450 and 81455), and TRS (81455). Compared with FY-17, FY-18 to FY-23 showed improved percent of cases reimbursed for CGAT. Six-year average percentage of cases reimbursed showed 68% (yearly range: 58% to 80%) for CGAT, 74% (69% to 92%) for mutation NGS under 81450, and 76% (50% to 81%) for mutation NGS and TRS under 81455. The percentage of cases reimbursed varied between payers: CGAT/NGS had 82%/71% by commercial payers, 65%/70% by Medicaid, and 53%/83% by Medicare. The payer mix varied between years with the median payer percentage of commercial payers at 52% (45 to 57%), Medicare at 32% (25 to 45%), and Medicaid at 11% (7 to 15%). Out of 33 TRS studies billed, 20 cases were reimbursed (61%), including 9 out of 11 (82%) by commercial, 7 out of 14 (50%) by Medicare, and 4 out of 5 by Medicaid (80%). In conclusion, our assessment of percentage of claims receiving payment suggests improved reimbursement landscape for molecular assays over time with a trend showing more success with commercial payers than Medicare and Medicaid as well as higher percentage of cases being reimbursed for mutation NGS than for CGAT.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Cancer Genetics is to publish high quality scientific papers on the cellular, genetic and molecular aspects of cancer, including cancer predisposition and clinical diagnostic applications. Specific areas of interest include descriptions of new chromosomal, molecular or epigenetic alterations in benign and malignant diseases; novel laboratory approaches for identification and characterization of chromosomal rearrangements or genomic alterations in cancer cells; correlation of genetic changes with pathology and clinical presentation; and the molecular genetics of cancer predisposition. To reach a basic science and clinical multidisciplinary audience, we welcome original full-length articles, reviews, meeting summaries, brief reports, and letters to the editor.