Barina Aqil , Lucas Santana-Santos , Juehua Gao , Xinyan Lu , Amandeep Kaur , Erica Vormittag-Nocito , Lawrence Jennings , Yasmin Abaza , Madina Sukhanova
{"title":"6.与非 D816 KIT 变体相比,骨髓性肿瘤中的热点 D816 KIT 具有不同的临床结果","authors":"Barina Aqil , Lucas Santana-Santos , Juehua Gao , Xinyan Lu , Amandeep Kaur , Erica Vormittag-Nocito , Lawrence Jennings , Yasmin Abaza , Madina Sukhanova","doi":"10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>KIT</em> (proto-oncogene) plays significant role in diagnosis and prognosis of myeloid neoplasms (MNs). The hot-spot <em>KIT</em> D816 mutation in exon 17 is recognized by WHO classification as poor prognostic marker for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with <em>RUNX1::RUNX1T1</em> and as one of diagnostic and prognostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis (SM), a MN characterized by clonal proliferation of mast cells. The role of activating <em>KIT</em> mutations outside of codon 816 was recognized, resulting in addition of few critical <em>KIT</em> regions in updated consensus proposal for SM diagnosis. However, information on prognostic weight of these 'non-hot-spot' changes is limited. Here we present results of comparative analysis of clinicopathological and survival parameters for patients diagnosed with MNs with activating <em>KIT</em> changes outside of codon 816 (N=14) using patients with MNs with <em>KIT</em> D816 (N=26) as comparative group. Most of study patients had AML (65%) followed by MDS and MDS/MPN (35% combined). Both study groups had same representation of normal, non-complex and complex karyotypes, and karyotypes with diagnostic t(8;21) and inv(16). IHC staining for c-KIT (CD117) detected significantly lower percentage of mast cells with c-Kit protein expression in non-D816 group in contrast to patients with D816 <em>KIT</em> (p<0.0076). Consistent with that, none of the non-D816 group patients developed SM compared to 31% of D816 group patients who developed SM. Notably, the group with non-D816 <em>KIT</em> showed better OS compared to patients with D816 change (p<0.016). Our results support the hypothesis of weaker prognostic impact of non-D816 <em>KIT</em> mutations compared to D816 hot-spot.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49225,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Genetics","volume":"286 ","pages":"Pages S2-S3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"6. Hot-spot D816 KIT has different clinical outcome compared to non-D816 KIT variants in myeloid neoplasms\",\"authors\":\"Barina Aqil , Lucas Santana-Santos , Juehua Gao , Xinyan Lu , Amandeep Kaur , Erica Vormittag-Nocito , Lawrence Jennings , Yasmin Abaza , Madina Sukhanova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>KIT</em> (proto-oncogene) plays significant role in diagnosis and prognosis of myeloid neoplasms (MNs). The hot-spot <em>KIT</em> D816 mutation in exon 17 is recognized by WHO classification as poor prognostic marker for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with <em>RUNX1::RUNX1T1</em> and as one of diagnostic and prognostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis (SM), a MN characterized by clonal proliferation of mast cells. The role of activating <em>KIT</em> mutations outside of codon 816 was recognized, resulting in addition of few critical <em>KIT</em> regions in updated consensus proposal for SM diagnosis. However, information on prognostic weight of these 'non-hot-spot' changes is limited. Here we present results of comparative analysis of clinicopathological and survival parameters for patients diagnosed with MNs with activating <em>KIT</em> changes outside of codon 816 (N=14) using patients with MNs with <em>KIT</em> D816 (N=26) as comparative group. Most of study patients had AML (65%) followed by MDS and MDS/MPN (35% combined). Both study groups had same representation of normal, non-complex and complex karyotypes, and karyotypes with diagnostic t(8;21) and inv(16). IHC staining for c-KIT (CD117) detected significantly lower percentage of mast cells with c-Kit protein expression in non-D816 group in contrast to patients with D816 <em>KIT</em> (p<0.0076). Consistent with that, none of the non-D816 group patients developed SM compared to 31% of D816 group patients who developed SM. Notably, the group with non-D816 <em>KIT</em> showed better OS compared to patients with D816 change (p<0.016). Our results support the hypothesis of weaker prognostic impact of non-D816 <em>KIT</em> mutations compared to D816 hot-spot.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"volume\":\"286 \",\"pages\":\"Pages S2-S3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776224000462\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776224000462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
6. Hot-spot D816 KIT has different clinical outcome compared to non-D816 KIT variants in myeloid neoplasms
KIT (proto-oncogene) plays significant role in diagnosis and prognosis of myeloid neoplasms (MNs). The hot-spot KIT D816 mutation in exon 17 is recognized by WHO classification as poor prognostic marker for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 and as one of diagnostic and prognostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis (SM), a MN characterized by clonal proliferation of mast cells. The role of activating KIT mutations outside of codon 816 was recognized, resulting in addition of few critical KIT regions in updated consensus proposal for SM diagnosis. However, information on prognostic weight of these 'non-hot-spot' changes is limited. Here we present results of comparative analysis of clinicopathological and survival parameters for patients diagnosed with MNs with activating KIT changes outside of codon 816 (N=14) using patients with MNs with KIT D816 (N=26) as comparative group. Most of study patients had AML (65%) followed by MDS and MDS/MPN (35% combined). Both study groups had same representation of normal, non-complex and complex karyotypes, and karyotypes with diagnostic t(8;21) and inv(16). IHC staining for c-KIT (CD117) detected significantly lower percentage of mast cells with c-Kit protein expression in non-D816 group in contrast to patients with D816 KIT (p<0.0076). Consistent with that, none of the non-D816 group patients developed SM compared to 31% of D816 group patients who developed SM. Notably, the group with non-D816 KIT showed better OS compared to patients with D816 change (p<0.016). Our results support the hypothesis of weaker prognostic impact of non-D816 KIT mutations compared to D816 hot-spot.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Cancer Genetics is to publish high quality scientific papers on the cellular, genetic and molecular aspects of cancer, including cancer predisposition and clinical diagnostic applications. Specific areas of interest include descriptions of new chromosomal, molecular or epigenetic alterations in benign and malignant diseases; novel laboratory approaches for identification and characterization of chromosomal rearrangements or genomic alterations in cancer cells; correlation of genetic changes with pathology and clinical presentation; and the molecular genetics of cancer predisposition. To reach a basic science and clinical multidisciplinary audience, we welcome original full-length articles, reviews, meeting summaries, brief reports, and letters to the editor.