Tabitha S. Osler, Jean-Tristan Brandenburg, Mardelle Schoeman, Wenlong Carl Chen, Michael F. Urban, Christopher G. Mathew
{"title":"南非乳腺癌患者基因变异的流行和重新分类","authors":"Tabitha S. Osler, Jean-Tristan Brandenburg, Mardelle Schoeman, Wenlong Carl Chen, Michael F. Urban, Christopher G. Mathew","doi":"10.1002/gcc.23275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Concurrent testing of numerous genes for hereditary breast cancer (BC) is available but can result in management difficulties. We evaluated use of an expanded BC gene panel in women of diverse South African ancestries and assessed use of African genomic data to reclassify variants of uncertain significance (VUS). A total of 331 women of White, Black African, or Mixed Ancestry with BC had a 9-gene panel test, with an additional 75 genes tested in those without a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant. The proportion of VUS reclassified using ClinGen gene-specific allele frequency (AF) thresholds or an AF > 0.001 in nonguidelines genes in African genomic data was determined. The 9-gene panel identified 58 P/LP variants, but only two of the P/LP variants detected using the 75-gene panel were in confirmed BC genes, resulting in a total of 60 (18.1%) in all participants. P/LP variant prevalence was similar across ancestry groups, but VUS prevalence was higher in Black African and Mixed Ancestry than in White participants. In total, 611 VUS were detected, representing 324 distinct variants. 10.8% (9/83) of VUS met ClinGen AF thresholds in genomic data while 10.8% (26/240) in nonguideline genes had an AF > 0.001. Overall, 27.0% of VUS occurrences could potentially be reclassified using African genomic data. Thus, expanding the gene panel yielded few clinically actionable variants but many VUS, particularly in participants of Black African and Mixed Ancestry. However, use of African genomic data has the potential to reclassify a significant proportion of VUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12700,"journal":{"name":"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer","volume":"63 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gcc.23275","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Reclassification of Genetic Variants in South African Populations with Breast Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Tabitha S. Osler, Jean-Tristan Brandenburg, Mardelle Schoeman, Wenlong Carl Chen, Michael F. Urban, Christopher G. Mathew\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/gcc.23275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Concurrent testing of numerous genes for hereditary breast cancer (BC) is available but can result in management difficulties. We evaluated use of an expanded BC gene panel in women of diverse South African ancestries and assessed use of African genomic data to reclassify variants of uncertain significance (VUS). A total of 331 women of White, Black African, or Mixed Ancestry with BC had a 9-gene panel test, with an additional 75 genes tested in those without a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant. The proportion of VUS reclassified using ClinGen gene-specific allele frequency (AF) thresholds or an AF > 0.001 in nonguidelines genes in African genomic data was determined. The 9-gene panel identified 58 P/LP variants, but only two of the P/LP variants detected using the 75-gene panel were in confirmed BC genes, resulting in a total of 60 (18.1%) in all participants. P/LP variant prevalence was similar across ancestry groups, but VUS prevalence was higher in Black African and Mixed Ancestry than in White participants. In total, 611 VUS were detected, representing 324 distinct variants. 10.8% (9/83) of VUS met ClinGen AF thresholds in genomic data while 10.8% (26/240) in nonguideline genes had an AF > 0.001. Overall, 27.0% of VUS occurrences could potentially be reclassified using African genomic data. Thus, expanding the gene panel yielded few clinically actionable variants but many VUS, particularly in participants of Black African and Mixed Ancestry. However, use of African genomic data has the potential to reclassify a significant proportion of VUS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer\",\"volume\":\"63 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gcc.23275\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gcc.23275\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gcc.23275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目前可以对遗传性乳腺癌(BC)的多个基因同时进行检测,但可能会造成管理上的困难。我们对南非不同血统妇女使用扩大的 BC 基因面板进行了评估,并评估了使用非洲基因组数据对意义不确定的变异进行重新分类 (VUS)的情况。共有 331 名患有 BC 的白人、非洲黑人或混血女性接受了 9 个基因的全套检测,对没有致病/可能致病 (P/LP) 变异的女性进行了另外 75 个基因的检测。在非洲基因组数据中,使用 ClinGen 基因特异性等位基因频率 (AF) 阈值或 AF > 0.001 在非准则基因中确定了 VUS 的重新分类比例。9个基因小组发现了58个P/LP变异体,但在使用75个基因小组检测到的P/LP变异体中,只有两个变异体位于确诊的BC基因中,因此所有参与者中共有60个P/LP变异体(18.1%)。不同血统群体的 P/LP 变异发生率相似,但黑非洲人和混血人的 VUS 发生率高于白人。总共检测到 611 个 VUS,代表 324 个不同的变异。在基因组数据中,10.8%(9/83)的 VUS 达到了 ClinGen AF 临界值,而在非准则基因中,10.8%(26/240)的 VUS 的 AF 为 0.001。总体而言,27.0% 的 VUS 有可能通过非洲基因组数据进行重新分类。因此,扩大基因面板后,可用于临床的变异很少,但 VUS 却很多,尤其是在非洲黑人和混血参试者中。不过,使用非洲基因组数据有可能对很大一部分 VUS 进行重新分类。
Prevalence and Reclassification of Genetic Variants in South African Populations with Breast Cancer
Concurrent testing of numerous genes for hereditary breast cancer (BC) is available but can result in management difficulties. We evaluated use of an expanded BC gene panel in women of diverse South African ancestries and assessed use of African genomic data to reclassify variants of uncertain significance (VUS). A total of 331 women of White, Black African, or Mixed Ancestry with BC had a 9-gene panel test, with an additional 75 genes tested in those without a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant. The proportion of VUS reclassified using ClinGen gene-specific allele frequency (AF) thresholds or an AF > 0.001 in nonguidelines genes in African genomic data was determined. The 9-gene panel identified 58 P/LP variants, but only two of the P/LP variants detected using the 75-gene panel were in confirmed BC genes, resulting in a total of 60 (18.1%) in all participants. P/LP variant prevalence was similar across ancestry groups, but VUS prevalence was higher in Black African and Mixed Ancestry than in White participants. In total, 611 VUS were detected, representing 324 distinct variants. 10.8% (9/83) of VUS met ClinGen AF thresholds in genomic data while 10.8% (26/240) in nonguideline genes had an AF > 0.001. Overall, 27.0% of VUS occurrences could potentially be reclassified using African genomic data. Thus, expanding the gene panel yielded few clinically actionable variants but many VUS, particularly in participants of Black African and Mixed Ancestry. However, use of African genomic data has the potential to reclassify a significant proportion of VUS.
期刊介绍:
Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer will offer rapid publication of original full-length research articles, perspectives, reviews and letters to the editors on genetic analysis as related to the study of neoplasia. The main scope of the journal is to communicate new insights into the etiology and/or pathogenesis of neoplasia, as well as molecular and cellular findings of relevance for the management of cancer patients. While preference will be given to research utilizing analytical and functional approaches, descriptive studies and case reports will also be welcomed when they offer insights regarding basic biological mechanisms or the clinical management of neoplastic disorders.