益智喂食器作为一种增强认知能力的策略,能长期改善箭鱼的福利状况

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Elia Gatto , Chiara Varracchio , Cristiano Bertolucci , Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato
{"title":"益智喂食器作为一种增强认知能力的策略,能长期改善箭鱼的福利状况","authors":"Elia Gatto ,&nbsp;Chiara Varracchio ,&nbsp;Cristiano Bertolucci ,&nbsp;Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Providing access to cognitive tasks, such as puzzle feeders, holds promise as enrichment strategy to enhance the welfare of captive animals. Despite the substantial number of teleost fish in captivity, the effects of cognitive enrichments in this group remain relatively unexplored. To address this gap in knowledge, we investigated the response of zebrafish to a puzzle feeder. In the first experiment of this study, zebrafish were presented with the option of a puzzle feeder or freely available food. While the subjects exhibited a preference for the latter option, they demonstrated some interest in the puzzle feeder, continuing to use it even though there was easily accessible food nearby. In a subsequent experiment, zebrafish groups were maintained in either a cognitive enrichment condition, where food was consistently provided through puzzle feeders, or a control condition with no cognitive enrichments. Welfare effects of the treatments were then assessed using standard behavioural indicators in the open-field test (i.e., time spent in the centre of the apparatus; number of entrances in the central sector; swim velocity; erratic swimming). Results unveiled an improvement in three welfare indicators due to cognitive enrichment, becoming apparent approximately 20 days after the treatment. Our study underscores the significance of puzzle feeders as cognitive enrichments in captive fish welfare, although consideration of other welfare indicators and different types of puzzles that elicit a more pronounced attraction is required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 106401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Puzzle feeder as a cognitive enrichment strategy determines long-term welfare improvements in a teleost fish\",\"authors\":\"Elia Gatto ,&nbsp;Chiara Varracchio ,&nbsp;Cristiano Bertolucci ,&nbsp;Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Providing access to cognitive tasks, such as puzzle feeders, holds promise as enrichment strategy to enhance the welfare of captive animals. Despite the substantial number of teleost fish in captivity, the effects of cognitive enrichments in this group remain relatively unexplored. To address this gap in knowledge, we investigated the response of zebrafish to a puzzle feeder. In the first experiment of this study, zebrafish were presented with the option of a puzzle feeder or freely available food. While the subjects exhibited a preference for the latter option, they demonstrated some interest in the puzzle feeder, continuing to use it even though there was easily accessible food nearby. In a subsequent experiment, zebrafish groups were maintained in either a cognitive enrichment condition, where food was consistently provided through puzzle feeders, or a control condition with no cognitive enrichments. Welfare effects of the treatments were then assessed using standard behavioural indicators in the open-field test (i.e., time spent in the centre of the apparatus; number of entrances in the central sector; swim velocity; erratic swimming). Results unveiled an improvement in three welfare indicators due to cognitive enrichment, becoming apparent approximately 20 days after the treatment. Our study underscores the significance of puzzle feeders as cognitive enrichments in captive fish welfare, although consideration of other welfare indicators and different types of puzzles that elicit a more pronounced attraction is required.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"279 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124002491\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124002491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提供认知任务的机会,如益智喂食器,有望成为提高圈养动物福利的强化策略。尽管人工饲养的远摄鱼类数量可观,但认知强化训练对这一群体的影响仍相对较少。为了填补这一知识空白,我们研究了斑马鱼对益智喂食器的反应。在本研究的第一个实验中,斑马鱼可以选择益智喂食器或自由获取的食物。虽然斑马鱼表现出了对后者的偏好,但它们对益智喂食器也表现出了一定的兴趣,即使附近有很容易获得的食物,它们也会继续使用益智喂食器。在随后的实验中,斑马鱼群体被置于两种认知强化条件下,一种是通过益智喂食器持续提供食物,另一种是不进行认知强化的对照条件。然后在开放场地测试中使用标准行为指标(即在仪器中心停留的时间;中心区域的入口数量;游动速度;不规则游动)来评估处理对斑马鱼福利的影响。结果表明,由于认知能力的增强,三项福利指标都有所改善,这在治疗后约20天变得明显。我们的研究强调了益智喂食器作为提高圈养鱼类福利的认知能力的重要性,尽管还需要考虑其他福利指标和不同类型的益智游戏,以引起更明显的吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Puzzle feeder as a cognitive enrichment strategy determines long-term welfare improvements in a teleost fish
Providing access to cognitive tasks, such as puzzle feeders, holds promise as enrichment strategy to enhance the welfare of captive animals. Despite the substantial number of teleost fish in captivity, the effects of cognitive enrichments in this group remain relatively unexplored. To address this gap in knowledge, we investigated the response of zebrafish to a puzzle feeder. In the first experiment of this study, zebrafish were presented with the option of a puzzle feeder or freely available food. While the subjects exhibited a preference for the latter option, they demonstrated some interest in the puzzle feeder, continuing to use it even though there was easily accessible food nearby. In a subsequent experiment, zebrafish groups were maintained in either a cognitive enrichment condition, where food was consistently provided through puzzle feeders, or a control condition with no cognitive enrichments. Welfare effects of the treatments were then assessed using standard behavioural indicators in the open-field test (i.e., time spent in the centre of the apparatus; number of entrances in the central sector; swim velocity; erratic swimming). Results unveiled an improvement in three welfare indicators due to cognitive enrichment, becoming apparent approximately 20 days after the treatment. Our study underscores the significance of puzzle feeders as cognitive enrichments in captive fish welfare, although consideration of other welfare indicators and different types of puzzles that elicit a more pronounced attraction is required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信