腹部创伤手术后实施改良的术后强化恢复（ERAS）；可行性和结果评估：随机对照试验 (RCT)

IF 2.7 3区医学 Q1 SURGERY

American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115975

Vibhu Jain , Santhosh Irrinki , Siddhant Khare , Kailash Chand Kurdia , Sathish Subbiah Nagaraj , Yashwant Raj Sakaray , Ajay Savlania , Cherring Tandup , Prerna Verma , Lileshwar Kaman

{"title":"腹部创伤手术后实施改良的术后强化恢复（ERAS）；可行性和结果评估：随机对照试验 (RCT)","authors":"Vibhu Jain , Santhosh Irrinki , Siddhant Khare , Kailash Chand Kurdia , Sathish Subbiah Nagaraj , Yashwant Raj Sakaray , Ajay Savlania , Cherring Tandup , Prerna Verma , Lileshwar Kaman","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) is a set of multiple perioperative care component not a rigid protocol with improved outcomes for elective surgeries. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes in trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Prospective single-centre randomized controlled trial(RCT). Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy following trauma were randomized into ERAS(early removal of catheters, early mobilization and initiation of diet, use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia) and conventional care groups 24 h post-surgery. Outcome measures included length of hospitalization(LOH), recovery of bowel function, duration of removal of catheters and 30-day complications(Clavien-Dindo).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty patients were randomized into ERAS(n = 25) and conventional care(n = 25) groups. Ninety-two percent of patients were young males, 58 % had blunt trauma to the abdomen and the most common indication of surgery was hollow viscus injury(88 %). ERAS group had a reduced median LOH(days) (6 versus 8, p = 0.007), early recovery of bowel function(p = 0.010) and shorter times for nasogastric tube(p = 0.001), urinary catheter(p = 0.007) and drain(p = 0.006) removal. The complications were comparable in both groups except for deep surgical site infection[significantly lower in ERAS group(p = 0.009)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ERAS is safe and significantly reduces LOH in select trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 115975"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following surgery for abdominal trauma; Assessment of feasibility and outcomes: A randomized controlled trial (RCT)\",\"authors\":\"Vibhu Jain , Santhosh Irrinki , Siddhant Khare , Kailash Chand Kurdia , Sathish Subbiah Nagaraj , Yashwant Raj Sakaray , Ajay Savlania , Cherring Tandup , Prerna Verma , Lileshwar Kaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) is a set of multiple perioperative care component not a rigid protocol with improved outcomes for elective surgeries. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes in trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Prospective single-centre randomized controlled trial(RCT). Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy following trauma were randomized into ERAS(early removal of catheters, early mobilization and initiation of diet, use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia) and conventional care groups 24 h post-surgery. Outcome measures included length of hospitalization(LOH), recovery of bowel function, duration of removal of catheters and 30-day complications(Clavien-Dindo).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty patients were randomized into ERAS(n = 25) and conventional care(n = 25) groups. Ninety-two percent of patients were young males, 58 % had blunt trauma to the abdomen and the most common indication of surgery was hollow viscus injury(88 %). ERAS group had a reduced median LOH(days) (6 versus 8, p = 0.007), early recovery of bowel function(p = 0.010) and shorter times for nasogastric tube(p = 0.001), urinary catheter(p = 0.007) and drain(p = 0.006) removal. The complications were comparable in both groups except for deep surgical site infection[significantly lower in ERAS group(p = 0.009)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ERAS is safe and significantly reduces LOH in select trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005270\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景术后强化恢复（ERAS）是一套多重围手术期护理方案，而非僵化的方案，可改善择期手术的疗效。本研究旨在评估接受开腹手术的创伤患者的可行性和疗效。研究设计前瞻性单中心随机对照试验（RCT）。在创伤后接受紧急开腹手术的患者在手术后24小时被随机分为ERAS组（早期拔除导管、早期活动和开始饮食、使用阿片类稀释多模式镇痛）和常规护理组。结果50名患者被随机分为ERAS组（25人）和常规护理组（25人）。92%的患者为年轻男性，58%的患者为腹部钝性创伤，最常见的手术指征为空腔脏器损伤（88%）。ERAS 组的中位 LOH（天数）减少（6 对 8，p = 0.007），肠道功能恢复早（p = 0.010），鼻胃管（p = 0.001）、导尿管（p = 0.007）和引流管（p = 0.006）拔除时间短。除了深部手术部位感染[ERAS 组明显较低(p = 0.009)]，两组的并发症情况相当。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Implementation of modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following surgery for abdominal trauma; Assessment of feasibility and outcomes: A randomized controlled trial (RCT)

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) is a set of multiple perioperative care component not a rigid protocol with improved outcomes for elective surgeries. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes in trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.

Study design

Prospective single-centre randomized controlled trial(RCT). Patients undergoing emergency laparotomy following trauma were randomized into ERAS(early removal of catheters, early mobilization and initiation of diet, use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia) and conventional care groups 24 h post-surgery. Outcome measures included length of hospitalization(LOH), recovery of bowel function, duration of removal of catheters and 30-day complications(Clavien-Dindo).

Results

Fifty patients were randomized into ERAS(n = 25) and conventional care(n = 25) groups. Ninety-two percent of patients were young males, 58 % had blunt trauma to the abdomen and the most common indication of surgery was hollow viscus injury(88 %). ERAS group had a reduced median LOH(days) (6 versus 8, p = 0.007), early recovery of bowel function(p = 0.010) and shorter times for nasogastric tube(p = 0.001), urinary catheter(p = 0.007) and drain(p = 0.006) removal. The complications were comparable in both groups except for deep surgical site infection[significantly lower in ERAS group(p = 0.009)].

Conclusion

ERAS is safe and significantly reduces LOH in select trauma patients undergoing laparotomy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

American journal of surgery 医学-外科

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

6.70%

发文量

570

审稿时长

56 days

期刊介绍： The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.