利用在线评论和专家意见确定电动汽车类型的优先次序

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Han Wang , Yao-Jiao Xin , Muhammet Deveci , Witold Pedrycz , Zengqiang Wang , Zhen-Song Chen
{"title":"利用在线评论和专家意见确定电动汽车类型的优先次序","authors":"Han Wang ,&nbsp;Yao-Jiao Xin ,&nbsp;Muhammet Deveci ,&nbsp;Witold Pedrycz ,&nbsp;Zengqiang Wang ,&nbsp;Zhen-Song Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid expansion of the electric vehicle (EV) market in recent years has presented manufacturers with the challenge of strategically prioritizing the types of EVs in which to invest under uncertain conditions. This study proposes an enhanced multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) framework to address this issue by leveraging online reviews and expert opinions. The proposed framework combines a novel linguistic representation, called calibrated basic uncertain linguistic information (CBULI), to capture uncertainty, a value function from cumulative prospect theory (CPT) with double reference points to model the manufacturers’ psychological preferences, and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations II (PROMETHEE II) for prioritizing EVs for investment. It extracts demand attributes from online reviews, applies CBULI to represent uncertain evaluations, and incorporates CPT to capture risk preferences. A case study of an EV manufacturing enterprise in Sichuan, China, was conducted to validate our framework, and the results demonstrated its effectiveness and practicability in identifying the most promising types of EVs for investment. The results of sensitivity and comparative analyses further confirmed the robustness and superiority of the model in comparison with prevalent methods. The work here contributes to methodological advancements in research on the choice of types of EVs in which to invest, and provides valuable insights for EV enterprises to make informed investment-related decisions that are aligned with user demands and enterprise development. The proposed MADM framework supports the strategic development of the EV industry by enabling manufacturers to prioritize investment in the appropriate types of EVs under uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging online reviews and expert opinions for electric vehicle type prioritization\",\"authors\":\"Han Wang ,&nbsp;Yao-Jiao Xin ,&nbsp;Muhammet Deveci ,&nbsp;Witold Pedrycz ,&nbsp;Zengqiang Wang ,&nbsp;Zhen-Song Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rapid expansion of the electric vehicle (EV) market in recent years has presented manufacturers with the challenge of strategically prioritizing the types of EVs in which to invest under uncertain conditions. This study proposes an enhanced multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) framework to address this issue by leveraging online reviews and expert opinions. The proposed framework combines a novel linguistic representation, called calibrated basic uncertain linguistic information (CBULI), to capture uncertainty, a value function from cumulative prospect theory (CPT) with double reference points to model the manufacturers’ psychological preferences, and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations II (PROMETHEE II) for prioritizing EVs for investment. It extracts demand attributes from online reviews, applies CBULI to represent uncertain evaluations, and incorporates CPT to capture risk preferences. A case study of an EV manufacturing enterprise in Sichuan, China, was conducted to validate our framework, and the results demonstrated its effectiveness and practicability in identifying the most promising types of EVs for investment. The results of sensitivity and comparative analyses further confirmed the robustness and superiority of the model in comparison with prevalent methods. The work here contributes to methodological advancements in research on the choice of types of EVs in which to invest, and provides valuable insights for EV enterprises to make informed investment-related decisions that are aligned with user demands and enterprise development. The proposed MADM framework supports the strategic development of the EV industry by enabling manufacturers to prioritize investment in the appropriate types of EVs under uncertainty.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Industrial Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224007009\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224007009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,电动汽车(EV)市场迅速扩张,这给制造商带来了挑战,即在不确定的条件下,如何从战略上优先考虑投资的电动汽车类型。本研究提出了一种增强型多属性决策(MADM)框架,利用在线评论和专家意见来解决这一问题。所提出的框架结合了新颖的语言表征(称为校准基本不确定语言信息(CBULI))来捕捉不确定性,结合了累积前景理论(CPT)的价值函数与双重参考点来模拟制造商的心理偏好,并结合了用于丰富评价的偏好排序组织法 II(PROMETHEE II)来确定电动汽车投资的优先次序。它从在线评论中提取需求属性,应用 CBULI 来表示不确定的评价,并结合 CPT 来捕捉风险偏好。为了验证我们的框架,我们对中国四川的一家电动汽车生产企业进行了案例研究,结果证明了该框架在确定最有投资前景的电动汽车类型方面的有效性和实用性。敏感性分析和比较分析的结果进一步证实了该模型的稳健性以及与现有方法相比的优越性。本文的研究工作推动了电动汽车投资类型选择研究方法的进步,并为电动汽车企业根据用户需求和企业发展做出明智的投资相关决策提供了有价值的见解。所提出的 MADM 框架使制造商能够在不确定情况下优先投资于适当类型的电动汽车,从而支持电动汽车行业的战略发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging online reviews and expert opinions for electric vehicle type prioritization
The rapid expansion of the electric vehicle (EV) market in recent years has presented manufacturers with the challenge of strategically prioritizing the types of EVs in which to invest under uncertain conditions. This study proposes an enhanced multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) framework to address this issue by leveraging online reviews and expert opinions. The proposed framework combines a novel linguistic representation, called calibrated basic uncertain linguistic information (CBULI), to capture uncertainty, a value function from cumulative prospect theory (CPT) with double reference points to model the manufacturers’ psychological preferences, and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations II (PROMETHEE II) for prioritizing EVs for investment. It extracts demand attributes from online reviews, applies CBULI to represent uncertain evaluations, and incorporates CPT to capture risk preferences. A case study of an EV manufacturing enterprise in Sichuan, China, was conducted to validate our framework, and the results demonstrated its effectiveness and practicability in identifying the most promising types of EVs for investment. The results of sensitivity and comparative analyses further confirmed the robustness and superiority of the model in comparison with prevalent methods. The work here contributes to methodological advancements in research on the choice of types of EVs in which to invest, and provides valuable insights for EV enterprises to make informed investment-related decisions that are aligned with user demands and enterprise development. The proposed MADM framework supports the strategic development of the EV industry by enabling manufacturers to prioritize investment in the appropriate types of EVs under uncertainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信