Ivo J. Lutke Schipholt , Gwendolyne G.M. Scholten-Peeters , Sifra Logghe , Meghan Koop , Sietse Donders , Martijn S. Stenneberg , Michel W. Coppieters
{"title":"CROM-VAS 测试:一种新颖可靠的临床测试,用于评估运动诱发的颈部疼痛治疗后的即时疼痛缓解情况","authors":"Ivo J. Lutke Schipholt , Gwendolyne G.M. Scholten-Peeters , Sifra Logghe , Meghan Koop , Sietse Donders , Martijn S. Stenneberg , Michel W. Coppieters","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The CROM-VAS Test is a novel method to quantify immediate hypoalgesic treatment effects for neck pain by measuring the reduction in pain intensity (using a VAS) at the same (sub)maximal neck position (using a CROM device) before and after treatment. It is a novel test designed to quantify immediate pain relief following treatment, without the potentially confounding effects of simultaneous improvements in function.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>(1) To describe the CROM-VAS Test, (2) To assess reliability and absolute agreement of the CROM-VAS Test, and (3) To evaluate its distinctiveness by comparing it to changes in pressure pain threshold (PPT) and baseline pain scores.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The CROM-VAS Test was assessed in 58 people with non-specific neck pain treated with cervical mobilisation and cervicothoracic manipulation. Inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>1.1</sub>)) and absolute agreement (standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA)) were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Reliability was high (ICC<sub>1.1</sub>: 0.91 (95%CI: 0.85–0.95) for the CROM-VAS Test in the painful direction and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.54–0.85) in the non/least painful direction). Agreement was good (CROM-VAS Test (painful direction): SEM: 2.3 mm; MDC: 6.4 mm; LoA: 13.5 to 16.6 mm; CROM-VAS Test (non/least painful direction): SEM: 4.0 mm; MDC: 11.1 mm; LoA: 14.7 to 22.0 mm). Low or negative correlations were observed between CROM-VAS Test scores and changes in PPT and baseline neck pain scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CROM-VAS Test has good clinimetric properties. It measures a distinct dimension of pain relief compared to PPTs and baseline pain scores.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002868/pdfft?md5=2382e791b5a2d03a9223df362822b2d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2468781224002868-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The CROM-VAS Test: A novel and reliable clinical test to assess immediate pain relief following treatment for movement-evoked neck pain\",\"authors\":\"Ivo J. Lutke Schipholt , Gwendolyne G.M. Scholten-Peeters , Sifra Logghe , Meghan Koop , Sietse Donders , Martijn S. Stenneberg , Michel W. Coppieters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The CROM-VAS Test is a novel method to quantify immediate hypoalgesic treatment effects for neck pain by measuring the reduction in pain intensity (using a VAS) at the same (sub)maximal neck position (using a CROM device) before and after treatment. It is a novel test designed to quantify immediate pain relief following treatment, without the potentially confounding effects of simultaneous improvements in function.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>(1) To describe the CROM-VAS Test, (2) To assess reliability and absolute agreement of the CROM-VAS Test, and (3) To evaluate its distinctiveness by comparing it to changes in pressure pain threshold (PPT) and baseline pain scores.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The CROM-VAS Test was assessed in 58 people with non-specific neck pain treated with cervical mobilisation and cervicothoracic manipulation. Inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>1.1</sub>)) and absolute agreement (standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA)) were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Reliability was high (ICC<sub>1.1</sub>: 0.91 (95%CI: 0.85–0.95) for the CROM-VAS Test in the painful direction and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.54–0.85) in the non/least painful direction). Agreement was good (CROM-VAS Test (painful direction): SEM: 2.3 mm; MDC: 6.4 mm; LoA: 13.5 to 16.6 mm; CROM-VAS Test (non/least painful direction): SEM: 4.0 mm; MDC: 11.1 mm; LoA: 14.7 to 22.0 mm). Low or negative correlations were observed between CROM-VAS Test scores and changes in PPT and baseline neck pain scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CROM-VAS Test has good clinimetric properties. It measures a distinct dimension of pain relief compared to PPTs and baseline pain scores.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002868/pdfft?md5=2382e791b5a2d03a9223df362822b2d9&pid=1-s2.0-S2468781224002868-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The CROM-VAS Test: A novel and reliable clinical test to assess immediate pain relief following treatment for movement-evoked neck pain
Background
The CROM-VAS Test is a novel method to quantify immediate hypoalgesic treatment effects for neck pain by measuring the reduction in pain intensity (using a VAS) at the same (sub)maximal neck position (using a CROM device) before and after treatment. It is a novel test designed to quantify immediate pain relief following treatment, without the potentially confounding effects of simultaneous improvements in function.
Objectives
(1) To describe the CROM-VAS Test, (2) To assess reliability and absolute agreement of the CROM-VAS Test, and (3) To evaluate its distinctiveness by comparing it to changes in pressure pain threshold (PPT) and baseline pain scores.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Methods
The CROM-VAS Test was assessed in 58 people with non-specific neck pain treated with cervical mobilisation and cervicothoracic manipulation. Inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC1.1)) and absolute agreement (standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA)) were determined.
Results
Reliability was high (ICC1.1: 0.91 (95%CI: 0.85–0.95) for the CROM-VAS Test in the painful direction and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.54–0.85) in the non/least painful direction). Agreement was good (CROM-VAS Test (painful direction): SEM: 2.3 mm; MDC: 6.4 mm; LoA: 13.5 to 16.6 mm; CROM-VAS Test (non/least painful direction): SEM: 4.0 mm; MDC: 11.1 mm; LoA: 14.7 to 22.0 mm). Low or negative correlations were observed between CROM-VAS Test scores and changes in PPT and baseline neck pain scores.
Conclusion
The CROM-VAS Test has good clinimetric properties. It measures a distinct dimension of pain relief compared to PPTs and baseline pain scores.