用于估算甘薯叶面积指数的 RGB 和多光谱无人机图像数据对比分析

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
{"title":"用于估算甘薯叶面积指数的 RGB 和多光谱无人机图像数据对比分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to evaluate whether the utilization of a broader array of image types and the extraction of plant canopy using RGB and multispectral cameras mounted on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can improve leaf area index (LAI) estimation accuracy. The accuracy of LAI estimation for sweet potato was compared across different model types—mono-regression models based on a single image, multivariate regression models based on a single type of image, and multivariate regression models based on multiple image types—by employing 10 types of images based on color, morphological indices, vegetation indices (VIs) from RGB cameras, reflectance, VIs from multispectral cameras, and each of their canopy part image. For each regression model, we compared the estimation accuracy based on the whole image with that based on the canopy part image. For the mono-regression model, EVI2 from the whole image exhibited the lowest test root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.403, which is attributed to EVI2’s capacity to mitigate the effects of spectral saturation. Contrary to the models with multiple image types that demonstrated improved accuracy, the multivariate regression models based on a single image type did not enhance estimation accuracy; this shows that the use of multiple image types improves the LAI estimation accuracy owing to the synergy of different spectral information from various image types. Plant canopy extraction did not enhance the estimation accuracy in mono-regression models or multivariate regression models based on a single image type; however, it improved the accuracy of multivariate regression models based on multiple image types, provided the image types were appropriately combined. The highest estimation accuracy was achieved by a partial least squares regression model based on VI (from the RGB camera) and reflectance (from the multispectral camera) of the canopy part (test R<sup>2</sup> = 0.887, test RMSE = 0.351), suggesting that this is an effective approach for LAI estimation in sweet potato (cultivar <em>Beniharuka</em>). Overall, this study demonstrates that an optimal combination of image type and plant canopy extraction can enhance LAI estimation accuracy in UAV-based monitoring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001849/pdfft?md5=34c5bd816bde6c21d710beba631ff961&pid=1-s2.0-S2772375524001849-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of RGB and multispectral UAV image data for leaf area index estimation of sweet potato\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aims to evaluate whether the utilization of a broader array of image types and the extraction of plant canopy using RGB and multispectral cameras mounted on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can improve leaf area index (LAI) estimation accuracy. The accuracy of LAI estimation for sweet potato was compared across different model types—mono-regression models based on a single image, multivariate regression models based on a single type of image, and multivariate regression models based on multiple image types—by employing 10 types of images based on color, morphological indices, vegetation indices (VIs) from RGB cameras, reflectance, VIs from multispectral cameras, and each of their canopy part image. For each regression model, we compared the estimation accuracy based on the whole image with that based on the canopy part image. For the mono-regression model, EVI2 from the whole image exhibited the lowest test root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.403, which is attributed to EVI2’s capacity to mitigate the effects of spectral saturation. Contrary to the models with multiple image types that demonstrated improved accuracy, the multivariate regression models based on a single image type did not enhance estimation accuracy; this shows that the use of multiple image types improves the LAI estimation accuracy owing to the synergy of different spectral information from various image types. Plant canopy extraction did not enhance the estimation accuracy in mono-regression models or multivariate regression models based on a single image type; however, it improved the accuracy of multivariate regression models based on multiple image types, provided the image types were appropriately combined. The highest estimation accuracy was achieved by a partial least squares regression model based on VI (from the RGB camera) and reflectance (from the multispectral camera) of the canopy part (test R<sup>2</sup> = 0.887, test RMSE = 0.351), suggesting that this is an effective approach for LAI estimation in sweet potato (cultivar <em>Beniharuka</em>). Overall, this study demonstrates that an optimal combination of image type and plant canopy extraction can enhance LAI estimation accuracy in UAV-based monitoring.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001849/pdfft?md5=34c5bd816bde6c21d710beba631ff961&pid=1-s2.0-S2772375524001849-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估利用更广泛的图像类型以及使用安装在无人机(UAV)上的 RGB 和多光谱相机提取植物冠层是否能提高叶面积指数(LAI)估算的准确性。通过使用基于颜色、形态指数、RGB 摄像机的植被指数 (VI)、反射率、多光谱摄像机的植被指数及其冠层部分图像的 10 种类型的图像,比较了不同模型类型(基于单幅图像的单回归模型、基于单类图像的多变量回归模型和基于多类图像的多变量回归模型)对甘薯叶面积指数估算的准确性。对于每种回归模型,我们都比较了基于整幅图像和基于冠层部分图像的估算精度。在单回归模型中,来自整幅图像的 EVI2 的测试均方根误差(RMSE)最低,为 0.403,这归因于 EVI2 能够减轻光谱饱和的影响。与采用多种图像类型的模型提高了精度相反,基于单一图像类型的多元回归模型并没有提高估算精度;这表明,采用多种图像类型可提高 LAI 估算精度,这是因为各种图像类型的不同光谱信息具有协同作用。植物冠层提取并没有提高基于单一图像类型的单回归模型或多元回归模型的估算精度;但是,如果图像类型组合得当,则可以提高基于多种图像类型的多元回归模型的精度。基于冠层部分 VI(来自 RGB 摄像机)和反射率(来自多光谱摄像机)的偏最小二乘法回归模型达到了最高的估计精度(测试 R2 = 0.887,测试 RMSE = 0.351),表明这是估计甘薯(栽培品种 Beniharuka)LAI 的有效方法。总之,本研究表明,在基于无人机的监测中,图像类型和植物冠层提取的优化组合可提高 LAI 估算的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of RGB and multispectral UAV image data for leaf area index estimation of sweet potato
This study aims to evaluate whether the utilization of a broader array of image types and the extraction of plant canopy using RGB and multispectral cameras mounted on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can improve leaf area index (LAI) estimation accuracy. The accuracy of LAI estimation for sweet potato was compared across different model types—mono-regression models based on a single image, multivariate regression models based on a single type of image, and multivariate regression models based on multiple image types—by employing 10 types of images based on color, morphological indices, vegetation indices (VIs) from RGB cameras, reflectance, VIs from multispectral cameras, and each of their canopy part image. For each regression model, we compared the estimation accuracy based on the whole image with that based on the canopy part image. For the mono-regression model, EVI2 from the whole image exhibited the lowest test root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.403, which is attributed to EVI2’s capacity to mitigate the effects of spectral saturation. Contrary to the models with multiple image types that demonstrated improved accuracy, the multivariate regression models based on a single image type did not enhance estimation accuracy; this shows that the use of multiple image types improves the LAI estimation accuracy owing to the synergy of different spectral information from various image types. Plant canopy extraction did not enhance the estimation accuracy in mono-regression models or multivariate regression models based on a single image type; however, it improved the accuracy of multivariate regression models based on multiple image types, provided the image types were appropriately combined. The highest estimation accuracy was achieved by a partial least squares regression model based on VI (from the RGB camera) and reflectance (from the multispectral camera) of the canopy part (test R2 = 0.887, test RMSE = 0.351), suggesting that this is an effective approach for LAI estimation in sweet potato (cultivar Beniharuka). Overall, this study demonstrates that an optimal combination of image type and plant canopy extraction can enhance LAI estimation accuracy in UAV-based monitoring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信