美国老年人健康预期寿命的城乡差距。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jack M Chapel, Elizabeth Currid-Halkett, Bryan Tysinger
{"title":"美国老年人健康预期寿命的城乡差距。","authors":"Jack M Chapel, Elizabeth Currid-Halkett, Bryan Tysinger","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Estimate health-quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for Americans nearing retirement age and assess rural-urban disparities in QALE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a dynamic microsimulation model based on Health and Retirement Study data to estimate the quantity and health quality of expected future life years for rural and urban Americans ages 59-60 in 2014-2020.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Cohort life expectancy at age 60 (LE) for urban and rural men was 22.9 and 20.9, respectively; for urban and rural women, LE was 25.6 and 25.0, respectively. Adjusting future life years to quality-adjusted life years, QALE was 17.5 versus 15.7 for urban versus rural men, and 19.3 versus 18.7 for women. Compared to a cohort in 1994-2000, the urban-rural QALE gap in 2014-2020 grew substantially for men; changes for women were smaller. Average QALE masked heterogeneity by race/ethnicity, education, and Census region. Counterfactual scenarios suggested eliminating smoking and managing obesity and prevalent heart conditions would be particularly beneficial for increasing rural QALE and reducing the urban-rural gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expected health quality, in addition to longevity, is an important factor when assessing rural disparities in older Americans' future life outcomes. Current chronic disease disparities are expected to translate to a widening urban-rural gap in QALE, particularly for men. Interventions earlier in life may be needed to fully address disparities in QALE at older ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The urban-rural gap in older Americans' healthy life expectancy.\",\"authors\":\"Jack M Chapel, Elizabeth Currid-Halkett, Bryan Tysinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Estimate health-quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for Americans nearing retirement age and assess rural-urban disparities in QALE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a dynamic microsimulation model based on Health and Retirement Study data to estimate the quantity and health quality of expected future life years for rural and urban Americans ages 59-60 in 2014-2020.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Cohort life expectancy at age 60 (LE) for urban and rural men was 22.9 and 20.9, respectively; for urban and rural women, LE was 25.6 and 25.0, respectively. Adjusting future life years to quality-adjusted life years, QALE was 17.5 versus 15.7 for urban versus rural men, and 19.3 versus 18.7 for women. Compared to a cohort in 1994-2000, the urban-rural QALE gap in 2014-2020 grew substantially for men; changes for women were smaller. Average QALE masked heterogeneity by race/ethnicity, education, and Census region. Counterfactual scenarios suggested eliminating smoking and managing obesity and prevalent heart conditions would be particularly beneficial for increasing rural QALE and reducing the urban-rural gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expected health quality, in addition to longevity, is an important factor when assessing rural disparities in older Americans' future life outcomes. Current chronic disease disparities are expected to translate to a widening urban-rural gap in QALE, particularly for men. Interventions earlier in life may be needed to fully address disparities in QALE at older ages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12875\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:估算接近退休年龄的美国人的健康质量调整后预期寿命(QALE),并评估健康质量调整后预期寿命的城乡差异:方法:我们使用基于健康与退休研究数据的动态微观模拟模型,估算了 2014-2020 年 59-60 岁美国城乡居民未来预期寿命的数量和健康质量:城市和农村男性 60 岁时的群组预期寿命(LE)分别为 22.9 岁和 20.9 岁;城市和农村女性的预期寿命分别为 25.6 岁和 25.0 岁。将未来生命年调整为质量调整生命年后,城市和农村男性的质量调整生命年分别为 17.5 年和 15.7 年,女性为 19.3 年和 18.7 年。与 1994-2000 年的队列相比,2014-2020 年的城乡男性 QALE 差距大幅扩大;女性的变化较小。平均 QALE 掩盖了种族/族裔、教育程度和人口普查地区的异质性。反事实情景表明,消除吸烟、控制肥胖和心脏疾病尤其有利于提高农村 QALE 和缩小城乡差距:在评估美国农村老年人未来生活结果的差距时,除寿命外,预期健康质量也是一个重要因素。目前的慢性病差距预计将转化为城乡之间在 QALE 方面不断扩大的差距,尤其是男性。可能需要在生命早期采取干预措施,以全面解决老年期 QALE 的差距问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The urban-rural gap in older Americans' healthy life expectancy.

Purpose: Estimate health-quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) for Americans nearing retirement age and assess rural-urban disparities in QALE.

Methods: We used a dynamic microsimulation model based on Health and Retirement Study data to estimate the quantity and health quality of expected future life years for rural and urban Americans ages 59-60 in 2014-2020.

Findings: Cohort life expectancy at age 60 (LE) for urban and rural men was 22.9 and 20.9, respectively; for urban and rural women, LE was 25.6 and 25.0, respectively. Adjusting future life years to quality-adjusted life years, QALE was 17.5 versus 15.7 for urban versus rural men, and 19.3 versus 18.7 for women. Compared to a cohort in 1994-2000, the urban-rural QALE gap in 2014-2020 grew substantially for men; changes for women were smaller. Average QALE masked heterogeneity by race/ethnicity, education, and Census region. Counterfactual scenarios suggested eliminating smoking and managing obesity and prevalent heart conditions would be particularly beneficial for increasing rural QALE and reducing the urban-rural gap.

Conclusions: Expected health quality, in addition to longevity, is an important factor when assessing rural disparities in older Americans' future life outcomes. Current chronic disease disparities are expected to translate to a widening urban-rural gap in QALE, particularly for men. Interventions earlier in life may be needed to fully address disparities in QALE at older ages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信