无骨水泥长柄反向全肩关节成形术作为肱骨干骺端骨折的主要治疗方法。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00081
Austin Witt, Eddie Y Lo, Alvin Ouseph, Sumant G Krishnan
{"title":"无骨水泥长柄反向全肩关节成形术作为肱骨干骺端骨折的主要治疗方法。","authors":"Austin Witt, Eddie Y Lo, Alvin Ouseph, Sumant G Krishnan","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of cementless diaphysis-fitting stems has been shown to be an effective treatment option for cases of metadiaphyseal humeral fracture. Complex metadiaphyseal fractures are those that extend below the surgical neck into the diaphysis, which can compromise the metaphyseal fixation of typical arthroplasty designs. The presently described surgical technique circumvents the potential risks associated with the use of cement while also permitting the treatment of common concomitant pathologies, such as arthritis and rotator cuff tendinopathy. Evidence supports the efficacy of this technique, showcasing consistent rates of healing, pain relief, and functional recovery, as well as acceptable complication rates compared with alternative surgical options.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The surgical procedure is performed with the patient in a modified beach chair position. A deltopectoral approach is utilized in order to expose the humerus and glenoid. In cases in which the tuberosity is fractured, it is carefully tagged for subsequent repair. The metadiaphyseal extension of the fracture is exposed, and reduction is performed with cerclage cable augmentation as needed. When direct reduction proves challenging, the humeral prosthesis is utilized to aid in reduction. Full-length humeral radiographs and a humeral sounder are utilized to guide the placement of a trial prosthesis, ensuring that the stem spans 2 canal diameters past the fracture and restores the appropriate humeral length. The medullary stem is utilized as support for fracture fragment reduction, with use of a combination of bone stitching and cerclage cables as required. Fractures with compromised proximal humeral bone stock can be further augmented with extramedullary strut allografts and cerclage cables. The allograft strut fixation acts as a neutralization plate to maintain rotational control. The joint is reduced, and fixation of the subscapularis and tuberosity is achieved with use of a transosseous suture technique. This technique combines the use of arthroplasty as well as standard osteosynthesis principles to treat complex metadiaphyseal humerus fractures.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Nonoperative treatment may be indicated in a primary setting and represents a multifactorial patient-specific decision. Other surgical options include open reduction with internal fixation with plates or an intramedullary humeral nail, and cemented long-stem arthroplasty. If the fracture is too distal and the surgeon is unable to achieve a length of 2 canal diameters for distal fixation, alternative treatment strategies such as cementation may be required.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>This procedure is most often performed in elderly patients with osteoporosis, who often also have comminuted fracture patterns and conditions such as glenohumeral arthritis or chronic rotator cuff pathology<sup>1,5,6,13,15</sup>. Whereas open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) can be effective in younger patients, it poses higher risks of complications in patients with osteoporosis<sup>1,3,9,14-16</sup>. Neither ORIF nor intramedullary nailing addresses concurrent pathologies. Another alternative technique involves the use of a cemented stem; however, a cementless approach eliminates theoretical risks of cement use, allows easier revisions, and achieves comparable outcomes<sup>9,16,20</sup>. In summary, cementless long-stem RTSA offers consistent healing rates, satisfactory outcomes, and favorable results.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Cementless long-stem reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a viable alternative for elderly patients with metadiaphyseal proximal humeral fractures. This technique shows consistent healing rates, pain relief, shoulder function restoration, and an acceptable complication rate. In a study of 14 patients who underwent cementless long-stem RTSA from September 2017 to August 2020, all patients showed improved outcomes and radiographic evidence of union at an average of 13 months postoperatively. Minor complications have been reported, such as transient neuropathy, tuberosity nonunion, and humeral stress shielding.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>This technique is optimal for elderly patients with osteoporotic bone, comminuted fractures, glenohumeral arthritis, and/or rotator cuff pathology.Long comminuted fractures require bridging fixation, spanning 2 canal diameters beyond the fracture site.Patients with compromised proximal humeral bone stock may require allograft strut augmentation.The surgical principle integrates standard arthroplasty for joint length restoration, a relative fracture stability concept by spanning complex fracture segments, and an absolute stability concept by direct fragment alignment.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>RTSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyIMN = intramedullary nailORIF = open reduction and internal fixationAVN = avascular necrosisAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed topographyTSA = total shoulder arthroplastyXR = plain radiographsFU = follow-upSST = simple shoulder testASES = American Shoulder and Elbow SurgeonsDASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and HandPROM = patient-reported outcome measuresROM = range of motion.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cementless Long-Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty as Primary Treatment for Metadiaphyseal Humeral Shaft Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Austin Witt, Eddie Y Lo, Alvin Ouseph, Sumant G Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of cementless diaphysis-fitting stems has been shown to be an effective treatment option for cases of metadiaphyseal humeral fracture. Complex metadiaphyseal fractures are those that extend below the surgical neck into the diaphysis, which can compromise the metaphyseal fixation of typical arthroplasty designs. The presently described surgical technique circumvents the potential risks associated with the use of cement while also permitting the treatment of common concomitant pathologies, such as arthritis and rotator cuff tendinopathy. Evidence supports the efficacy of this technique, showcasing consistent rates of healing, pain relief, and functional recovery, as well as acceptable complication rates compared with alternative surgical options.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The surgical procedure is performed with the patient in a modified beach chair position. A deltopectoral approach is utilized in order to expose the humerus and glenoid. In cases in which the tuberosity is fractured, it is carefully tagged for subsequent repair. The metadiaphyseal extension of the fracture is exposed, and reduction is performed with cerclage cable augmentation as needed. When direct reduction proves challenging, the humeral prosthesis is utilized to aid in reduction. Full-length humeral radiographs and a humeral sounder are utilized to guide the placement of a trial prosthesis, ensuring that the stem spans 2 canal diameters past the fracture and restores the appropriate humeral length. The medullary stem is utilized as support for fracture fragment reduction, with use of a combination of bone stitching and cerclage cables as required. Fractures with compromised proximal humeral bone stock can be further augmented with extramedullary strut allografts and cerclage cables. The allograft strut fixation acts as a neutralization plate to maintain rotational control. The joint is reduced, and fixation of the subscapularis and tuberosity is achieved with use of a transosseous suture technique. This technique combines the use of arthroplasty as well as standard osteosynthesis principles to treat complex metadiaphyseal humerus fractures.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Nonoperative treatment may be indicated in a primary setting and represents a multifactorial patient-specific decision. Other surgical options include open reduction with internal fixation with plates or an intramedullary humeral nail, and cemented long-stem arthroplasty. If the fracture is too distal and the surgeon is unable to achieve a length of 2 canal diameters for distal fixation, alternative treatment strategies such as cementation may be required.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>This procedure is most often performed in elderly patients with osteoporosis, who often also have comminuted fracture patterns and conditions such as glenohumeral arthritis or chronic rotator cuff pathology<sup>1,5,6,13,15</sup>. Whereas open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) can be effective in younger patients, it poses higher risks of complications in patients with osteoporosis<sup>1,3,9,14-16</sup>. Neither ORIF nor intramedullary nailing addresses concurrent pathologies. Another alternative technique involves the use of a cemented stem; however, a cementless approach eliminates theoretical risks of cement use, allows easier revisions, and achieves comparable outcomes<sup>9,16,20</sup>. In summary, cementless long-stem RTSA offers consistent healing rates, satisfactory outcomes, and favorable results.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Cementless long-stem reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a viable alternative for elderly patients with metadiaphyseal proximal humeral fractures. This technique shows consistent healing rates, pain relief, shoulder function restoration, and an acceptable complication rate. In a study of 14 patients who underwent cementless long-stem RTSA from September 2017 to August 2020, all patients showed improved outcomes and radiographic evidence of union at an average of 13 months postoperatively. Minor complications have been reported, such as transient neuropathy, tuberosity nonunion, and humeral stress shielding.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>This technique is optimal for elderly patients with osteoporotic bone, comminuted fractures, glenohumeral arthritis, and/or rotator cuff pathology.Long comminuted fractures require bridging fixation, spanning 2 canal diameters beyond the fracture site.Patients with compromised proximal humeral bone stock may require allograft strut augmentation.The surgical principle integrates standard arthroplasty for joint length restoration, a relative fracture stability concept by spanning complex fracture segments, and an absolute stability concept by direct fragment alignment.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>RTSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyIMN = intramedullary nailORIF = open reduction and internal fixationAVN = avascular necrosisAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed topographyTSA = total shoulder arthroplastyXR = plain radiographsFU = follow-upSST = simple shoulder testASES = American Shoulder and Elbow SurgeonsDASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and HandPROM = patient-reported outcome measuresROM = range of motion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00081\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缩略语:RTSA=反向全肩关节置换术IMN=髓内钉ORIF=开放复位和内固定AVN=血管性坏死AP=前胸CT=计算机地形图TSA=全肩关节置换术XR=平片FU=随访SST=简单肩关节测试ASES=美国肩肘外科医生DASH=手臂、肩部和手部残疾PROM=患者报告的结果测量ROM=活动范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cementless Long-Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty as Primary Treatment for Metadiaphyseal Humeral Shaft Fractures.

Background: The use of cementless diaphysis-fitting stems has been shown to be an effective treatment option for cases of metadiaphyseal humeral fracture. Complex metadiaphyseal fractures are those that extend below the surgical neck into the diaphysis, which can compromise the metaphyseal fixation of typical arthroplasty designs. The presently described surgical technique circumvents the potential risks associated with the use of cement while also permitting the treatment of common concomitant pathologies, such as arthritis and rotator cuff tendinopathy. Evidence supports the efficacy of this technique, showcasing consistent rates of healing, pain relief, and functional recovery, as well as acceptable complication rates compared with alternative surgical options.

Description: The surgical procedure is performed with the patient in a modified beach chair position. A deltopectoral approach is utilized in order to expose the humerus and glenoid. In cases in which the tuberosity is fractured, it is carefully tagged for subsequent repair. The metadiaphyseal extension of the fracture is exposed, and reduction is performed with cerclage cable augmentation as needed. When direct reduction proves challenging, the humeral prosthesis is utilized to aid in reduction. Full-length humeral radiographs and a humeral sounder are utilized to guide the placement of a trial prosthesis, ensuring that the stem spans 2 canal diameters past the fracture and restores the appropriate humeral length. The medullary stem is utilized as support for fracture fragment reduction, with use of a combination of bone stitching and cerclage cables as required. Fractures with compromised proximal humeral bone stock can be further augmented with extramedullary strut allografts and cerclage cables. The allograft strut fixation acts as a neutralization plate to maintain rotational control. The joint is reduced, and fixation of the subscapularis and tuberosity is achieved with use of a transosseous suture technique. This technique combines the use of arthroplasty as well as standard osteosynthesis principles to treat complex metadiaphyseal humerus fractures.

Alternatives: Nonoperative treatment may be indicated in a primary setting and represents a multifactorial patient-specific decision. Other surgical options include open reduction with internal fixation with plates or an intramedullary humeral nail, and cemented long-stem arthroplasty. If the fracture is too distal and the surgeon is unable to achieve a length of 2 canal diameters for distal fixation, alternative treatment strategies such as cementation may be required.

Rationale: This procedure is most often performed in elderly patients with osteoporosis, who often also have comminuted fracture patterns and conditions such as glenohumeral arthritis or chronic rotator cuff pathology1,5,6,13,15. Whereas open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) can be effective in younger patients, it poses higher risks of complications in patients with osteoporosis1,3,9,14-16. Neither ORIF nor intramedullary nailing addresses concurrent pathologies. Another alternative technique involves the use of a cemented stem; however, a cementless approach eliminates theoretical risks of cement use, allows easier revisions, and achieves comparable outcomes9,16,20. In summary, cementless long-stem RTSA offers consistent healing rates, satisfactory outcomes, and favorable results.

Expected outcomes: Cementless long-stem reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is a viable alternative for elderly patients with metadiaphyseal proximal humeral fractures. This technique shows consistent healing rates, pain relief, shoulder function restoration, and an acceptable complication rate. In a study of 14 patients who underwent cementless long-stem RTSA from September 2017 to August 2020, all patients showed improved outcomes and radiographic evidence of union at an average of 13 months postoperatively. Minor complications have been reported, such as transient neuropathy, tuberosity nonunion, and humeral stress shielding.

Important tips: This technique is optimal for elderly patients with osteoporotic bone, comminuted fractures, glenohumeral arthritis, and/or rotator cuff pathology.Long comminuted fractures require bridging fixation, spanning 2 canal diameters beyond the fracture site.Patients with compromised proximal humeral bone stock may require allograft strut augmentation.The surgical principle integrates standard arthroplasty for joint length restoration, a relative fracture stability concept by spanning complex fracture segments, and an absolute stability concept by direct fragment alignment.

Acronyms and abbreviations: RTSA = reverse total shoulder arthroplastyIMN = intramedullary nailORIF = open reduction and internal fixationAVN = avascular necrosisAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed topographyTSA = total shoulder arthroplastyXR = plain radiographsFU = follow-upSST = simple shoulder testASES = American Shoulder and Elbow SurgeonsDASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and HandPROM = patient-reported outcome measuresROM = range of motion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信