比较五种预测恶性胸腔积液死亡率的评分方法。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-01985-2
Merve Ayik Türk, Gülru Polat, Özer Özdemir, Yunus Türk, Berna Kömürcüoğlu
{"title":"比较五种预测恶性胸腔积液死亡率的评分方法。","authors":"Merve Ayik Türk, Gülru Polat, Özer Özdemir, Yunus Türk, Berna Kömürcüoğlu","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-01985-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a complication of malignancy. Treatment of MPE is based on predicted outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the performance characteristics of LENT, PROMISE, RECLS, AL and pNLR scores for prediction of mortality in lung cancer patients who have MPE. Patients who were diagnosed with MPE that was associated with underlying lung cancer between January 2010 and December 2019 were included and analyzed retrospectively in a single center. Outcomes considered were 30-day, 6 months, and 1-year mortality. A total of 180 patients were examined. For 30-day mortality, the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) (95% CI) were: LENT 0.83 (0.76-0.87), RECLS 0.71 (0.63-0.77), and PROMISE 0.70 (0.17-0.38). For 6-month and 1-year mortality the order of these AUCs was similar. Cox regression showed that none of the scores were significantly associated with 30-day mortality, but LENT and RECLS were significantly associated with 6-month and 1-year mortality. Comparison of - 2log likelihood ratios showed that LENT score was more, strongly associated with 6-month mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) or RECLS (p = 0.02). LENT score was also more strongly associated with 1-year mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) but there was no difference between LENT and RECLS score (p = 0.64). We observed that the LENT score was more predictive than the other scores in mortality in patients who have lung cancer and MPE. The LENT and RECLS scores have similar performance characteristics for prediction of 1-year mortality in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2885-2892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of five scores to predict mortality in malignant pleural effusion.\",\"authors\":\"Merve Ayik Türk, Gülru Polat, Özer Özdemir, Yunus Türk, Berna Kömürcüoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-024-01985-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a complication of malignancy. Treatment of MPE is based on predicted outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the performance characteristics of LENT, PROMISE, RECLS, AL and pNLR scores for prediction of mortality in lung cancer patients who have MPE. Patients who were diagnosed with MPE that was associated with underlying lung cancer between January 2010 and December 2019 were included and analyzed retrospectively in a single center. Outcomes considered were 30-day, 6 months, and 1-year mortality. A total of 180 patients were examined. For 30-day mortality, the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) (95% CI) were: LENT 0.83 (0.76-0.87), RECLS 0.71 (0.63-0.77), and PROMISE 0.70 (0.17-0.38). For 6-month and 1-year mortality the order of these AUCs was similar. Cox regression showed that none of the scores were significantly associated with 30-day mortality, but LENT and RECLS were significantly associated with 6-month and 1-year mortality. Comparison of - 2log likelihood ratios showed that LENT score was more, strongly associated with 6-month mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) or RECLS (p = 0.02). LENT score was also more strongly associated with 1-year mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) but there was no difference between LENT and RECLS score (p = 0.64). We observed that the LENT score was more predictive than the other scores in mortality in patients who have lung cancer and MPE. The LENT and RECLS scores have similar performance characteristics for prediction of 1-year mortality in these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2885-2892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01985-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01985-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是恶性肿瘤的一种并发症。MPE的治疗以预测结果为基础。本研究旨在比较 LENT、PROMISE、RECLS、AL 和 pNLR 评分在预测肺癌 MPE 患者死亡率方面的表现特征。研究纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间确诊为 MPE 并伴有潜在肺癌的患者,并对单个中心的患者进行了回顾性分析。研究结果包括 30 天、6 个月和 1 年的死亡率。共研究了 180 名患者。30天死亡率的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)(95% CI)为LENT为0.83(0.76-0.87),RECLS为0.71(0.63-0.77),PROMISE为0.70(0.17-0.38)。对于 6 个月和 1 年的死亡率,这些 AUC 的顺序相似。Cox 回归显示,没有一项评分与 30 天死亡率有显著相关性,但 LENT 和 RECLS 与 6 个月和 1 年死亡率有显著相关性。2log 似然比比较显示,LENT 评分与 6 个月死亡率的相关性比 PROMISE(p = 0.001)或 RECLS(p = 0.02)更强。LENT 评分与 1 年死亡率的相关性也比 PROMISE 更强(p = 0.001),但 LENT 评分与 RECLS 评分之间没有差异(p = 0.64)。我们观察到,LENT 评分比其他评分更能预测肺癌合并 MPE 患者的死亡率。LENT 评分和 RECLS 评分在预测这些患者的 1 年死亡率方面具有相似的表现特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of five scores to predict mortality in malignant pleural effusion.

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a complication of malignancy. Treatment of MPE is based on predicted outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the performance characteristics of LENT, PROMISE, RECLS, AL and pNLR scores for prediction of mortality in lung cancer patients who have MPE. Patients who were diagnosed with MPE that was associated with underlying lung cancer between January 2010 and December 2019 were included and analyzed retrospectively in a single center. Outcomes considered were 30-day, 6 months, and 1-year mortality. A total of 180 patients were examined. For 30-day mortality, the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) (95% CI) were: LENT 0.83 (0.76-0.87), RECLS 0.71 (0.63-0.77), and PROMISE 0.70 (0.17-0.38). For 6-month and 1-year mortality the order of these AUCs was similar. Cox regression showed that none of the scores were significantly associated with 30-day mortality, but LENT and RECLS were significantly associated with 6-month and 1-year mortality. Comparison of - 2log likelihood ratios showed that LENT score was more, strongly associated with 6-month mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) or RECLS (p = 0.02). LENT score was also more strongly associated with 1-year mortality than PROMISE (p = 0.001) but there was no difference between LENT and RECLS score (p = 0.64). We observed that the LENT score was more predictive than the other scores in mortality in patients who have lung cancer and MPE. The LENT and RECLS scores have similar performance characteristics for prediction of 1-year mortality in these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信