评估用透视尺测量股骨粉碎性骨折的准确性和可靠性:尸体研究

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20240918-03
Brian D Wahlig, Nicolas P Kuttner, Frank A Kouzel-Martinez, Samuel E Broida, Stephen A Sems, Krystin A Hidden, Brandon J Yuan
{"title":"评估用透视尺测量股骨粉碎性骨折的准确性和可靠性:尸体研究","authors":"Brian D Wahlig, Nicolas P Kuttner, Frank A Kouzel-Martinez, Samuel E Broida, Stephen A Sems, Krystin A Hidden, Brandon J Yuan","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20240918-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fixation of comminuted femur fractures may result in limb length discrepancy. Intraoperative fluoroscopic measurement of the contralateral femur with a ruler is commonly performed to establish a reference for femoral length. No evidence regarding the reliability and accuracy of this technique exists. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and interrater reliability of a fluoroscopic ruler in obtaining correct femoral length in a comminuted femoral shaft fracture model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Approximately 5 cm of bone was removed from the left femoral diaphyses of 8 cadavers. Seven orthopedic surgery residents and 2 attendings measured the length of the intact contralateral femur using a ruler under fluoroscopy. The ruler was then applied to the \"fractured\" femur with manual traction applied until femoral length matched the measured length of the contralateral femur. The resulting gap in the \"fractured\" femur was compared with the length of bone that had been resected. Data were analyzed using means, SDs, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven measurements were collected. The mean difference between the measured fracture gap and the length of bone removed was 8.0±5.8 mm (range, 0-22 mm). Femoral length was accurate to 5 mm in 40% of cases, 10 mm in 70%, 15 mm in 81%, 20 mm in 98%, and 25 mm in 100%. The overall interrater reliability was poor (ICC, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.001-0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite poor interrater reliability, the fluoroscopic ruler resulted in a mean leg length discrepancy of 8.0±5.8 mm in this cadaveric study. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2024;47(6):327-331.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":"327-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Accuracy and Reliability of the Fluoroscopic Ruler for Comminuted Femur Fractures: A Cadaveric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Brian D Wahlig, Nicolas P Kuttner, Frank A Kouzel-Martinez, Samuel E Broida, Stephen A Sems, Krystin A Hidden, Brandon J Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01477447-20240918-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fixation of comminuted femur fractures may result in limb length discrepancy. Intraoperative fluoroscopic measurement of the contralateral femur with a ruler is commonly performed to establish a reference for femoral length. No evidence regarding the reliability and accuracy of this technique exists. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and interrater reliability of a fluoroscopic ruler in obtaining correct femoral length in a comminuted femoral shaft fracture model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Approximately 5 cm of bone was removed from the left femoral diaphyses of 8 cadavers. Seven orthopedic surgery residents and 2 attendings measured the length of the intact contralateral femur using a ruler under fluoroscopy. The ruler was then applied to the \\\"fractured\\\" femur with manual traction applied until femoral length matched the measured length of the contralateral femur. The resulting gap in the \\\"fractured\\\" femur was compared with the length of bone that had been resected. Data were analyzed using means, SDs, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven measurements were collected. The mean difference between the measured fracture gap and the length of bone removed was 8.0±5.8 mm (range, 0-22 mm). Femoral length was accurate to 5 mm in 40% of cases, 10 mm in 70%, 15 mm in 81%, 20 mm in 98%, and 25 mm in 100%. The overall interrater reliability was poor (ICC, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.001-0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite poor interrater reliability, the fluoroscopic ruler resulted in a mean leg length discrepancy of 8.0±5.8 mm in this cadaveric study. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2024;47(6):327-331.].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"327-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240918-03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240918-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:股骨粉碎性骨折的固定可能会导致肢体长度差异。通常在术中用尺子透视测量股骨对侧,以确定股骨长度的参考值。目前尚无证据表明这一技术的可靠性和准确性。本研究旨在评估透视尺在粉碎性股骨干骨折模型中获得正确股骨长度的准确性和相互之间的可靠性:从 8 具尸体的左股骨骺端切除约 5 厘米的骨头。7 名骨科住院医师和 2 名主治医师在透视下使用直尺测量完整对侧股骨的长度。然后将直尺套在 "骨折 "的股骨上,并施加人工牵引,直到股骨长度与测量的对侧股骨长度一致。将 "骨折 "股骨的间隙与切除的骨头长度进行比较。数据采用均值、标度和类内相关系数(ICC)进行分析:结果:共收集了 57 次测量结果。测量的骨折间隙与切除骨长度之间的平均差值为 8.0±5.8 毫米(范围为 0-22 毫米)。40%的病例股骨长度精确到5毫米,70%的病例精确到10毫米,81%的病例精确到15毫米,98%的病例精确到20毫米,100%的病例精确到25毫米。研究者之间的总体可靠性较差(ICC,0.11;95% CI,0.001-0.44):结论:尽管评定者之间的可靠性较差,但在这项尸体研究中,透视尺导致的平均腿长差异为 8.0±5.8 毫米。[202x;4x(x):xx-xx]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Accuracy and Reliability of the Fluoroscopic Ruler for Comminuted Femur Fractures: A Cadaveric Study.

Background: Fixation of comminuted femur fractures may result in limb length discrepancy. Intraoperative fluoroscopic measurement of the contralateral femur with a ruler is commonly performed to establish a reference for femoral length. No evidence regarding the reliability and accuracy of this technique exists. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and interrater reliability of a fluoroscopic ruler in obtaining correct femoral length in a comminuted femoral shaft fracture model.

Materials and methods: Approximately 5 cm of bone was removed from the left femoral diaphyses of 8 cadavers. Seven orthopedic surgery residents and 2 attendings measured the length of the intact contralateral femur using a ruler under fluoroscopy. The ruler was then applied to the "fractured" femur with manual traction applied until femoral length matched the measured length of the contralateral femur. The resulting gap in the "fractured" femur was compared with the length of bone that had been resected. Data were analyzed using means, SDs, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: Fifty-seven measurements were collected. The mean difference between the measured fracture gap and the length of bone removed was 8.0±5.8 mm (range, 0-22 mm). Femoral length was accurate to 5 mm in 40% of cases, 10 mm in 70%, 15 mm in 81%, 20 mm in 98%, and 25 mm in 100%. The overall interrater reliability was poor (ICC, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.001-0.44).

Conclusion: Despite poor interrater reliability, the fluoroscopic ruler resulted in a mean leg length discrepancy of 8.0±5.8 mm in this cadaveric study. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(6):327-331.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信