Amir Qaseem, Karen Campos, Scott MacDonald, Cristin Mount, Samantha Tierney, Nick Fitterman
{"title":"成人疼痛质量指标:美国内科医师学会对绩效衡量标准的审查》(A Review of Performance Measures by the American College of Physicians)。","authors":"Amir Qaseem, Karen Campos, Scott MacDonald, Cristin Mount, Samantha Tierney, Nick Fitterman","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain is a debilitating symptom generally caused by injuries or various conditions. It can be acute, subacute, or chronic and can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. The goal of managing pain is to relieve or reduce suffering and improve patient functioning. Several performance measures that address the treatment of pain are used in payment, public reporting, or accountability programs. The American College of Physicians (ACP) embraces performance measurement as a means to improve quality of care. ACP believes that a performance measure must be methodologically sound and evidence-based to be considered for inclusion in payment, accountability, or reporting programs. However, a plethora of performance measures that provide minimal or no value to patient care have inundated physicians, practices, and systems with the burden of collecting and reporting data. ACP's Performance Measurement Committee (PMC) reviews performance measures using a validated process to recognize high-quality performance measures, address gaps and areas for improvement in performance measures, and help reduce reporting burden. There is a need for a higher standard for a performance measure when reputation and reimbursement are on the line. This paper aims to present a review of current performance measures for pain to inform physicians, payers, and policymakers in their selection and use of performance measures. The PMC reviewed 6 performance measures for pain relevant to internal medicine physicians, of which 3 were considered valid at their intended levels of attribution (\"Use of Imaging for Low Back Pain,\" \"Use of Opioids at High Dosage in Persons Without Cancer,\" and \"Use of Opioids From Multiple Providers in Persons Without Cancer\"). This paper also proposes a performance measure concept to address a quality-of-care gap based on the current clinical guideline from ACP and the American Academy of Family Physicians, \"Nonpharmacologic and Pharmacologic Management of Acute Pain From Non-low Back, Musculoskeletal Injuries in Adults.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Indicators for Pain in Adults: A Review of Performance Measures by the American College of Physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Qaseem, Karen Campos, Scott MacDonald, Cristin Mount, Samantha Tierney, Nick Fitterman\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pain is a debilitating symptom generally caused by injuries or various conditions. It can be acute, subacute, or chronic and can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. The goal of managing pain is to relieve or reduce suffering and improve patient functioning. Several performance measures that address the treatment of pain are used in payment, public reporting, or accountability programs. The American College of Physicians (ACP) embraces performance measurement as a means to improve quality of care. ACP believes that a performance measure must be methodologically sound and evidence-based to be considered for inclusion in payment, accountability, or reporting programs. However, a plethora of performance measures that provide minimal or no value to patient care have inundated physicians, practices, and systems with the burden of collecting and reporting data. ACP's Performance Measurement Committee (PMC) reviews performance measures using a validated process to recognize high-quality performance measures, address gaps and areas for improvement in performance measures, and help reduce reporting burden. There is a need for a higher standard for a performance measure when reputation and reimbursement are on the line. This paper aims to present a review of current performance measures for pain to inform physicians, payers, and policymakers in their selection and use of performance measures. The PMC reviewed 6 performance measures for pain relevant to internal medicine physicians, of which 3 were considered valid at their intended levels of attribution (\\\"Use of Imaging for Low Back Pain,\\\" \\\"Use of Opioids at High Dosage in Persons Without Cancer,\\\" and \\\"Use of Opioids From Multiple Providers in Persons Without Cancer\\\"). This paper also proposes a performance measure concept to address a quality-of-care gap based on the current clinical guideline from ACP and the American Academy of Family Physicians, \\\"Nonpharmacologic and Pharmacologic Management of Acute Pain From Non-low Back, Musculoskeletal Injuries in Adults.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00773\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
疼痛是一种使人衰弱的症状,一般由受伤或各种疾病引起。疼痛可以是急性、亚急性或慢性的,会对患者的生活质量产生重大影响。治疗疼痛的目的是缓解或减轻痛苦,改善病人的功能。一些针对疼痛治疗的绩效衡量标准被用于支付、公共报告或问责计划中。美国内科医师学会 (ACP) 将绩效衡量作为提高医疗质量的一种手段。ACP 认为,绩效衡量必须在方法上合理且有证据基础,才能考虑将其纳入支付、问责或报告计划。然而,大量对患者护理价值极低或毫无价值的绩效衡量标准,使医生、医疗机构和系统背上了收集和报告数据的沉重负担。ACP 的绩效考核委员会 (PMC) 采用有效的流程对绩效考核指标进行审核,以认可高质量的绩效考核指标,解决绩效考核指标中存在的差距和有待改进的地方,并帮助减轻报告负担。当声誉和报销岌岌可危时,有必要对绩效衡量标准提出更高的要求。本文旨在对当前的疼痛绩效指标进行回顾,为医生、支付方和政策制定者选择和使用绩效指标提供参考。项目管理委员会审查了 6 项与内科医生相关的疼痛绩效指标,其中 3 项被认为在其预定的归因水平上是有效的("腰背痛影像学检查的使用"、"无癌症患者高剂量阿片类药物的使用 "和 "无癌症患者从多个医疗机构使用阿片类药物")。本文还根据 ACP 和美国家庭医生学会(American Academy of Family Physicians)的现行临床指南 "成人非腰背、肌肉骨骼损伤引起的急性疼痛的非药物和药物治疗",提出了一个绩效衡量概念,以弥补护理质量方面的差距。
Quality Indicators for Pain in Adults: A Review of Performance Measures by the American College of Physicians.
Pain is a debilitating symptom generally caused by injuries or various conditions. It can be acute, subacute, or chronic and can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. The goal of managing pain is to relieve or reduce suffering and improve patient functioning. Several performance measures that address the treatment of pain are used in payment, public reporting, or accountability programs. The American College of Physicians (ACP) embraces performance measurement as a means to improve quality of care. ACP believes that a performance measure must be methodologically sound and evidence-based to be considered for inclusion in payment, accountability, or reporting programs. However, a plethora of performance measures that provide minimal or no value to patient care have inundated physicians, practices, and systems with the burden of collecting and reporting data. ACP's Performance Measurement Committee (PMC) reviews performance measures using a validated process to recognize high-quality performance measures, address gaps and areas for improvement in performance measures, and help reduce reporting burden. There is a need for a higher standard for a performance measure when reputation and reimbursement are on the line. This paper aims to present a review of current performance measures for pain to inform physicians, payers, and policymakers in their selection and use of performance measures. The PMC reviewed 6 performance measures for pain relevant to internal medicine physicians, of which 3 were considered valid at their intended levels of attribution ("Use of Imaging for Low Back Pain," "Use of Opioids at High Dosage in Persons Without Cancer," and "Use of Opioids From Multiple Providers in Persons Without Cancer"). This paper also proposes a performance measure concept to address a quality-of-care gap based on the current clinical guideline from ACP and the American Academy of Family Physicians, "Nonpharmacologic and Pharmacologic Management of Acute Pain From Non-low Back, Musculoskeletal Injuries in Adults."
期刊介绍:
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.