双频谱指数监测:优化硬质支气管镜检查中的麻醉。

Özal Adiyeke, Onur Sarban, Ergün Mendeş, Hilal Akça, Engin İhsan Turan, Barış Demirkol, Mehmet Akif Özgül, Funda Gümüş Özcan
{"title":"双频谱指数监测:优化硬质支气管镜检查中的麻醉。","authors":"Özal Adiyeke, Onur Sarban, Ergün Mendeş, Hilal Akça, Engin İhsan Turan, Barış Demirkol, Mehmet Akif Özgül, Funda Gümüş Özcan","doi":"10.5578/tt.202403938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the application of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in rigid bronchoscopy to enhance anesthetic delivery and patient outcomes, a topic that remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 155 patients undergoing elective rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia was conducted. Patients were divided into BIS-monitored and conventional anesthesia groups. Inclusion criteria were adults aged over 18 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-IV.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>No significant demographic differences were found between the groups. The BIS group showed significant reductions in propofol usage (231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg, p= 0.003) and prednol dosage (94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg, p= 0.020). Remifentanil administration approached statistical significance (56.99 ± 34.69 mcg vs. 45.36 ± 36.75 mcg, p= 0.055).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant demographic differences were found between the groups. The BIS group showed significant reductions in propofol usage (231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg, p= 0.003) and prednol dosage (94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg, p= 0.020). Remifentanil administration approached statistical significance (56.99 ± 34.69 mcg vs. 45.36 ± 36.75 mcg, p= 0.055).</p>","PeriodicalId":519894,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","volume":"72 3","pages":"191-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bispectral index monitoring: Optimizing anesthesia in rigid bronchoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Özal Adiyeke, Onur Sarban, Ergün Mendeş, Hilal Akça, Engin İhsan Turan, Barış Demirkol, Mehmet Akif Özgül, Funda Gümüş Özcan\",\"doi\":\"10.5578/tt.202403938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates the application of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in rigid bronchoscopy to enhance anesthetic delivery and patient outcomes, a topic that remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 155 patients undergoing elective rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia was conducted. Patients were divided into BIS-monitored and conventional anesthesia groups. Inclusion criteria were adults aged over 18 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-IV.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>No significant demographic differences were found between the groups. The BIS group showed significant reductions in propofol usage (231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg, p= 0.003) and prednol dosage (94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg, p= 0.020). Remifentanil administration approached statistical significance (56.99 ± 34.69 mcg vs. 45.36 ± 36.75 mcg, p= 0.055).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant demographic differences were found between the groups. The BIS group showed significant reductions in propofol usage (231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg, p= 0.003) and prednol dosage (94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg, p= 0.020). Remifentanil administration approached statistical significance (56.99 ± 34.69 mcg vs. 45.36 ± 36.75 mcg, p= 0.055).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberkuloz ve toraks\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"191-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberkuloz ve toraks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.202403938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.202403938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本研究探讨了双频谱指数(BIS)监测在硬质支气管镜检查中的应用,以提高麻醉效果和患者预后,而这一课题仍未得到充分探索:对 155 名在全身麻醉下接受择期硬质支气管镜检查的患者进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为 BIS 监测组和常规麻醉组。纳入标准为 18 岁以上、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况 I-IV 级的成年人:结果:两组之间没有发现明显的人口统计学差异。BIS 组的异丙酚用量(231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg,p= 0.003)和泼尼松用量(94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg,p= 0.020)明显减少。瑞芬太尼用量接近统计学意义(56.99 ± 34.69 微克 vs 45.36 ± 36.75 微克,p= 0.055):结论:两组之间没有发现明显的人口统计学差异。BIS 组的异丙酚用量(231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg,p= 0.003)和泼尼松用量(94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg,p= 0.020)明显减少。瑞芬太尼用量接近统计学意义(56.99 ± 34.69 微克 vs 45.36 ± 36.75 微克,p= 0.055)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bispectral index monitoring: Optimizing anesthesia in rigid bronchoscopy.

Introduction: This study investigates the application of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring in rigid bronchoscopy to enhance anesthetic delivery and patient outcomes, a topic that remains underexplored.

Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 155 patients undergoing elective rigid bronchoscopy under general anesthesia was conducted. Patients were divided into BIS-monitored and conventional anesthesia groups. Inclusion criteria were adults aged over 18 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-IV.

Result: No significant demographic differences were found between the groups. The BIS group showed significant reductions in propofol usage (231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg, p= 0.003) and prednol dosage (94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg, p= 0.020). Remifentanil administration approached statistical significance (56.99 ± 34.69 mcg vs. 45.36 ± 36.75 mcg, p= 0.055).

Conclusions: No significant demographic differences were found between the groups. The BIS group showed significant reductions in propofol usage (231.40 ± 74.63 mg vs. 190.19 ± 91.83 mg, p= 0.003) and prednol dosage (94.27 ± 42.56 mg vs. 79.71 ± 18.97 mg, p= 0.020). Remifentanil administration approached statistical significance (56.99 ± 34.69 mcg vs. 45.36 ± 36.75 mcg, p= 0.055).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信