Sicheng Hao, Katelyn Dempsey, João Matos, Christopher E Cox, Veronica Rotemberg, Judy W Gichoya, Warren Kibbe, Chuan Hong, An-Kwok Ian Wong
{"title":"重症患者肤色对脉搏氧饱和度的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Sicheng Hao, Katelyn Dempsey, João Matos, Christopher E Cox, Veronica Rotemberg, Judy W Gichoya, Warren Kibbe, Chuan Hong, An-Kwok Ian Wong","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulse oximetry, a ubiquitous vital sign in modern medicine, has inequitable accuracy that disproportionately affects minority Black and Hispanic patients, with associated increases in mortality, organ dysfunction, and oxygen therapy. Previous retrospective studies used self-reported race or ethnicity as a surrogate for skin tone which is believed to be the root cause of the disparity. Our objective was to determine the utility of skin tone in explaining pulse oximetry discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Patients were eligible if they had pulse oximetry recorded up to 5 minutes before arterial blood gas (ABG) measurements. Skin tone was measured using administered visual scales, reflectance colorimetry, and reflectance spectrophotometry.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Admitted hospital patients at Duke University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Sao2-Spo2 bias, variation of bias, and accuracy root mean square, comparing pulse oximetry, and ABG measurements. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to estimate Sao2-Spo2 bias while accounting for clinical confounders.One hundred twenty-eight patients (57 Black, 56 White) with 521 ABG-pulse oximetry pairs were recruited. Skin tone data were prospectively collected using six measurement methods, generating eight measurements. The collected skin tone measurements were shown to yield differences among each other and overlap with self-reported racial groups, suggesting that skin tone could potentially provide information beyond self-reported race. Among the eight skin tone measurements in this study, and compared with self-reported race, the Monk Scale had the best relationship with differences in pulse oximetry bias (point estimate: -2.40%; 95% CI, -4.32% to -0.48%; p = 0.01) when comparing patients with lighter and dark skin tones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found clinical performance differences in pulse oximetry, especially in darker skin tones. Additional studies are needed to determine the relative contributions of skin tone measures and other potential factors on pulse oximetry discrepancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 9","pages":"e1133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Skin Tone on Pulse Oximetry in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sicheng Hao, Katelyn Dempsey, João Matos, Christopher E Cox, Veronica Rotemberg, Judy W Gichoya, Warren Kibbe, Chuan Hong, An-Kwok Ian Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulse oximetry, a ubiquitous vital sign in modern medicine, has inequitable accuracy that disproportionately affects minority Black and Hispanic patients, with associated increases in mortality, organ dysfunction, and oxygen therapy. Previous retrospective studies used self-reported race or ethnicity as a surrogate for skin tone which is believed to be the root cause of the disparity. Our objective was to determine the utility of skin tone in explaining pulse oximetry discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Patients were eligible if they had pulse oximetry recorded up to 5 minutes before arterial blood gas (ABG) measurements. Skin tone was measured using administered visual scales, reflectance colorimetry, and reflectance spectrophotometry.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Admitted hospital patients at Duke University Hospital.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Sao2-Spo2 bias, variation of bias, and accuracy root mean square, comparing pulse oximetry, and ABG measurements. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to estimate Sao2-Spo2 bias while accounting for clinical confounders.One hundred twenty-eight patients (57 Black, 56 White) with 521 ABG-pulse oximetry pairs were recruited. Skin tone data were prospectively collected using six measurement methods, generating eight measurements. The collected skin tone measurements were shown to yield differences among each other and overlap with self-reported racial groups, suggesting that skin tone could potentially provide information beyond self-reported race. Among the eight skin tone measurements in this study, and compared with self-reported race, the Monk Scale had the best relationship with differences in pulse oximetry bias (point estimate: -2.40%; 95% CI, -4.32% to -0.48%; p = 0.01) when comparing patients with lighter and dark skin tones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found clinical performance differences in pulse oximetry, especially in darker skin tones. Additional studies are needed to determine the relative contributions of skin tone measures and other potential factors on pulse oximetry discrepancies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"6 9\",\"pages\":\"e1133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utility of Skin Tone on Pulse Oximetry in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Objective: Pulse oximetry, a ubiquitous vital sign in modern medicine, has inequitable accuracy that disproportionately affects minority Black and Hispanic patients, with associated increases in mortality, organ dysfunction, and oxygen therapy. Previous retrospective studies used self-reported race or ethnicity as a surrogate for skin tone which is believed to be the root cause of the disparity. Our objective was to determine the utility of skin tone in explaining pulse oximetry discrepancies.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Patients were eligible if they had pulse oximetry recorded up to 5 minutes before arterial blood gas (ABG) measurements. Skin tone was measured using administered visual scales, reflectance colorimetry, and reflectance spectrophotometry.
Participants: Admitted hospital patients at Duke University Hospital.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Sao2-Spo2 bias, variation of bias, and accuracy root mean square, comparing pulse oximetry, and ABG measurements. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to estimate Sao2-Spo2 bias while accounting for clinical confounders.One hundred twenty-eight patients (57 Black, 56 White) with 521 ABG-pulse oximetry pairs were recruited. Skin tone data were prospectively collected using six measurement methods, generating eight measurements. The collected skin tone measurements were shown to yield differences among each other and overlap with self-reported racial groups, suggesting that skin tone could potentially provide information beyond self-reported race. Among the eight skin tone measurements in this study, and compared with self-reported race, the Monk Scale had the best relationship with differences in pulse oximetry bias (point estimate: -2.40%; 95% CI, -4.32% to -0.48%; p = 0.01) when comparing patients with lighter and dark skin tones.
Conclusions: We found clinical performance differences in pulse oximetry, especially in darker skin tones. Additional studies are needed to determine the relative contributions of skin tone measures and other potential factors on pulse oximetry discrepancies.