用于全身麻醉的雷马唑仑对术后恶心和呕吐的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。

Die Anaesthesiologie Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s00101-024-01454-w
Su Yeon Kim, Kyu Man Sim, Hyo-Seok Na, Bon-Wook Koo, Hyun-Jung Shin
{"title":"用于全身麻醉的雷马唑仑对术后恶心和呕吐的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Su Yeon Kim, Kyu Man Sim, Hyo-Seok Na, Bon-Wook Koo, Hyun-Jung Shin","doi":"10.1007/s00101-024-01454-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzodiazepines reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV); however, conflicting results have been reported regarding the use of remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis examines whether remimazolam reduces PONV incidence compared with propofol or volatile agents used in general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science, were searched on 31 July 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV. Secondary outcomes included PONV severity, rescue antiemetic use, amounts of remifentanil used, and participant satisfaction scores. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1514 adult patients from 11 randomized controlled trials were included. The incidences of PONV in the remimazolam and control groups were 16.1% and 16.5%, respectively. Remimazolam did not increase the incidence of PONV (OR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37-1.04; p = 0.0676; I<sup>2</sup> = 48%). Subgroup analysis showed a significant reduction in PONV with remimazolam vs. volatile agents (OR 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.47; P = 0.0000; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) but not vs. propofol (OR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.70-1.56; p = 0.8332; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). More remifentanil was used in the remimazolam group vs. the volatile group, with no significant difference between remimazolam and propofol groups. Participant satisfaction scores were higher with remimazolam.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remimazolam did not increase PONV risk compared to propofol and reduced PONV incidence compared to volatile agents, with higher participant satisfaction. To validate the present findings, further well-planned large clinical trials are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":"685-693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of remimazolam for general anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting : A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Su Yeon Kim, Kyu Man Sim, Hyo-Seok Na, Bon-Wook Koo, Hyun-Jung Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00101-024-01454-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzodiazepines reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV); however, conflicting results have been reported regarding the use of remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis examines whether remimazolam reduces PONV incidence compared with propofol or volatile agents used in general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science, were searched on 31 July 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV. Secondary outcomes included PONV severity, rescue antiemetic use, amounts of remifentanil used, and participant satisfaction scores. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1514 adult patients from 11 randomized controlled trials were included. The incidences of PONV in the remimazolam and control groups were 16.1% and 16.5%, respectively. Remimazolam did not increase the incidence of PONV (OR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37-1.04; p = 0.0676; I<sup>2</sup> = 48%). Subgroup analysis showed a significant reduction in PONV with remimazolam vs. volatile agents (OR 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.47; P = 0.0000; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) but not vs. propofol (OR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.70-1.56; p = 0.8332; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). More remifentanil was used in the remimazolam group vs. the volatile group, with no significant difference between remimazolam and propofol groups. Participant satisfaction scores were higher with remimazolam.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remimazolam did not increase PONV risk compared to propofol and reduced PONV incidence compared to volatile agents, with higher participant satisfaction. To validate the present findings, further well-planned large clinical trials are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"685-693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01454-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01454-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:苯二氮卓类药物可减少术后恶心和呕吐(PONV);然而,关于使用一种新型苯二氮卓类药物--雷马唑仑的报道结果却相互矛盾:这项荟萃分析研究了与异丙酚或全身麻醉中使用的挥发性药物相比,雷马唑仑是否能降低PONV的发生率:于 2023 年 7 月 31 日检索了电子数据库,包括 PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 Web of Science。主要结果是 PONV 发生率。次要结果包括 PONV 严重程度、抢救止吐药使用量、瑞芬太尼使用量和参与者满意度评分。采用随机效应模型计算了患病率(OR)和平均差异(MD)及 95% 置信区间(CI)。使用 Cochrane RoB2 工具评估了偏倚风险(RoB):共纳入了 11 项随机对照试验中的 1514 名成年患者。雷马唑仑组和对照组的PONV发生率分别为16.1%和16.5%。雷马唑仑不会增加 PONV 的发生率(OR 0.62;95% CI,0.37-1.04;P = 0.0676;I2 = 48%)。亚组分析显示,与挥发性药物相比(OR 0.25;95% CI,0.13-0.47;P = 0.0000;I2 = 0%),使用瑞美唑仑可显著降低 PONV,但与异丙酚相比(OR 1.04;95% CI,0.70-1.56;P = 0.8332;I2 = 0%),PONV 并未降低。与挥发性组相比,瑞马唑仑组使用了更多的瑞芬太尼,而瑞马唑仑组与异丙酚组之间没有显著差异。使用瑞马唑仑的参与者满意度评分更高:结论:与异丙酚相比,雷马唑仑不会增加 PONV 风险,与挥发性药物相比,雷马唑仑可降低 PONV 发生率,且参与者满意度更高。为了验证本研究结果,需要进一步开展计划周密的大型临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of remimazolam for general anesthesia on postoperative nausea and vomiting : A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Benzodiazepines reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV); however, conflicting results have been reported regarding the use of remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine.

Objective: This meta-analysis examines whether remimazolam reduces PONV incidence compared with propofol or volatile agents used in general anesthesia.

Material and methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science, were searched on 31 July 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV. Secondary outcomes included PONV severity, rescue antiemetic use, amounts of remifentanil used, and participant satisfaction scores. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool.

Results: A total of 1514 adult patients from 11 randomized controlled trials were included. The incidences of PONV in the remimazolam and control groups were 16.1% and 16.5%, respectively. Remimazolam did not increase the incidence of PONV (OR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37-1.04; p = 0.0676; I2 = 48%). Subgroup analysis showed a significant reduction in PONV with remimazolam vs. volatile agents (OR 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.47; P = 0.0000; I2 = 0%) but not vs. propofol (OR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.70-1.56; p = 0.8332; I2 = 0%). More remifentanil was used in the remimazolam group vs. the volatile group, with no significant difference between remimazolam and propofol groups. Participant satisfaction scores were higher with remimazolam.

Conclusion: Remimazolam did not increase PONV risk compared to propofol and reduced PONV incidence compared to volatile agents, with higher participant satisfaction. To validate the present findings, further well-planned large clinical trials are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信