澳大利亚维多利亚州医护人员对产科超声波的经验和看法:横断面调查。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Vicky X Xu, Ingrid Mogren, Cecilia Bergström, Kristina Edvardsson, Rhonda Small, Margaret Flood, Sophia Holmlund, Rosemary Aldrich, Shaun Brennecke, Susan McDonald, Michael McEvoy, Joanne M Said, Michael Shembrey, Nicola Yuen, Christine E East
{"title":"澳大利亚维多利亚州医护人员对产科超声波的经验和看法:横断面调查。","authors":"Vicky X Xu, Ingrid Mogren, Cecilia Bergström, Kristina Edvardsson, Rhonda Small, Margaret Flood, Sophia Holmlund, Rosemary Aldrich, Shaun Brennecke, Susan McDonald, Michael McEvoy, Joanne M Said, Michael Shembrey, Nicola Yuen, Christine E East","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric ultrasound is an important tool, aiding in screening, diagnosis, and surveillance throughout pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore obstetric doctors', midwives', and sonographers' experiences and views of obstetric ultrasound in Victoria, Australia. To investigate the increasing role of obstetric ultrasound for clinical management, and the adequacy of resources and training for appropriate use of ultrasound in clinical management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study forms part of a multi-national CROss-Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS) exploring the views of consumers and health professionals from high-, middle- and low-income countries. Qualitative studies conducted in several countries informed the construction of a quantitative survey. These quantitative surveys were distributed to 16 hospitals across regional and metropolitan Victoria, Australia. Descriptive statistics were analysed from the responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 354 questionnaires returned from 106 doctors, 222 midwives, and 26 sonographers. Overall, 72% of respondents held concerns about the potential loss of focus on clinical skills with increasing ultrasound use. Midwives were more concerned about the contribution of ultrasound to medicalisation of pregnancy than were doctors (P < 0.001). Many respondents noted that geographical factors (71%), rather than income levels (53%) influenced access to obstetric ultrasound. Over 90% of doctors and midwives believed additional training for their respective professions in ultrasound would enhance its reach and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey findings confirm that clinicians place high levels of trust in the diagnostic findings of obstetric ultrasound antenatal care in Australia. Access to routine ultrasound could be improved for women in rural and lower-income areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Vicky X Xu, Ingrid Mogren, Cecilia Bergström, Kristina Edvardsson, Rhonda Small, Margaret Flood, Sophia Holmlund, Rosemary Aldrich, Shaun Brennecke, Susan McDonald, Michael McEvoy, Joanne M Said, Michael Shembrey, Nicola Yuen, Christine E East\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.13879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric ultrasound is an important tool, aiding in screening, diagnosis, and surveillance throughout pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore obstetric doctors', midwives', and sonographers' experiences and views of obstetric ultrasound in Victoria, Australia. To investigate the increasing role of obstetric ultrasound for clinical management, and the adequacy of resources and training for appropriate use of ultrasound in clinical management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study forms part of a multi-national CROss-Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS) exploring the views of consumers and health professionals from high-, middle- and low-income countries. Qualitative studies conducted in several countries informed the construction of a quantitative survey. These quantitative surveys were distributed to 16 hospitals across regional and metropolitan Victoria, Australia. Descriptive statistics were analysed from the responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 354 questionnaires returned from 106 doctors, 222 midwives, and 26 sonographers. Overall, 72% of respondents held concerns about the potential loss of focus on clinical skills with increasing ultrasound use. Midwives were more concerned about the contribution of ultrasound to medicalisation of pregnancy than were doctors (P < 0.001). Many respondents noted that geographical factors (71%), rather than income levels (53%) influenced access to obstetric ultrasound. Over 90% of doctors and midwives believed additional training for their respective professions in ultrasound would enhance its reach and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey findings confirm that clinicians place high levels of trust in the diagnostic findings of obstetric ultrasound antenatal care in Australia. Access to routine ultrasound could be improved for women in rural and lower-income areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13879\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13879","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产科超声波是一种重要工具,有助于整个孕期的筛查、诊断和监测。目的:探讨澳大利亚维多利亚州产科医生、助产士和超声波技师对产科超声波的经验和看法。调查产科超声波在临床管理中日益重要的作用,以及在临床管理中适当使用超声波的资源和培训是否充足:这项横断面研究是多国 CROss-Country 超声波研究(CROCUS)的一部分,旨在探讨来自高、中、低收入国家的消费者和医疗专业人员的观点。在多个国家开展的定性研究为定量调查提供了依据。这些定量调查问卷分发给了澳大利亚维多利亚州地区和大都市的 16 家医院。调查结果:共收到 354 份调查问卷:106 名医生、222 名助产士和 26 名超声技师共收回 354 份问卷。总体而言,72% 的受访者担心随着超声波使用的增加,临床技能可能会失去重点。助产士比医生更担心超声波会导致妊娠医学化(P 结论):我们的调查结果表明,在澳大利亚,临床医生非常信任产科超声产前检查的诊断结果。农村和低收入地区的妇女接受常规超声波检查的机会有待改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey.

Background: Obstetric ultrasound is an important tool, aiding in screening, diagnosis, and surveillance throughout pregnancy.

Aims: To explore obstetric doctors', midwives', and sonographers' experiences and views of obstetric ultrasound in Victoria, Australia. To investigate the increasing role of obstetric ultrasound for clinical management, and the adequacy of resources and training for appropriate use of ultrasound in clinical management.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study forms part of a multi-national CROss-Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS) exploring the views of consumers and health professionals from high-, middle- and low-income countries. Qualitative studies conducted in several countries informed the construction of a quantitative survey. These quantitative surveys were distributed to 16 hospitals across regional and metropolitan Victoria, Australia. Descriptive statistics were analysed from the responses.

Results: There were 354 questionnaires returned from 106 doctors, 222 midwives, and 26 sonographers. Overall, 72% of respondents held concerns about the potential loss of focus on clinical skills with increasing ultrasound use. Midwives were more concerned about the contribution of ultrasound to medicalisation of pregnancy than were doctors (P < 0.001). Many respondents noted that geographical factors (71%), rather than income levels (53%) influenced access to obstetric ultrasound. Over 90% of doctors and midwives believed additional training for their respective professions in ultrasound would enhance its reach and effectiveness.

Conclusions: Our survey findings confirm that clinicians place high levels of trust in the diagnostic findings of obstetric ultrasound antenatal care in Australia. Access to routine ultrasound could be improved for women in rural and lower-income areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信