初级保健在抑郁症复发中的作用:一项定性研究。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Andrew Stephen Moriarty, Emma Williams, Dean McMillan, Simon Gilbody, Carolyn A Chew-Graham
{"title":"初级保健在抑郁症复发中的作用:一项定性研究。","authors":"Andrew Stephen Moriarty, Emma Williams, Dean McMillan, Simon Gilbody, Carolyn A Chew-Graham","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Relapse contributes to the clinical and societal burden associated with depression. It is not well understood how relapse risk and prevention are managed and discussed between patients and general practitioners in primary care. Aim To understand the extent to which relapse risk and prevention are discussed and managed in general practice. Design and Setting Qualitative study in general practice. Method Participants were recruited through UK general practices. Data were generated using semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Patient and public involvement informed all aspects of the study. Results Twenty-three people with lived experience of depression and twenty-two GPs were interviewed. Three themes are presented in this paper: perceived determinants of depression course (participants viewed environmental, social and personal factors as being most significant); relapse risk and prevention (relapse was considered important but not consistently or routinely discussed in general practice consultations); and the key role of the GP-patient relationship and communication. Conceptually, relapse was perceived as having limited meaning and usefulness in primary care, due to the implication of an episodic, discrete course not recognised by many patients and an over-reliance on biomedical diagnosis. Longer-term follow-up and monitoring of depression could be improved in primary care. Conclusion We provide an evidence-informed framework to improve practice systems and GP consultations to improve longer-term care and support for people with depression. Going forwards, brief scalable relapse prevention interventions are needed to improve the ongoing care of people with depression in primary care; implementing these would require additional primary care resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of primary care in depression relapse: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Stephen Moriarty, Emma Williams, Dean McMillan, Simon Gilbody, Carolyn A Chew-Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Relapse contributes to the clinical and societal burden associated with depression. It is not well understood how relapse risk and prevention are managed and discussed between patients and general practitioners in primary care. Aim To understand the extent to which relapse risk and prevention are discussed and managed in general practice. Design and Setting Qualitative study in general practice. Method Participants were recruited through UK general practices. Data were generated using semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Patient and public involvement informed all aspects of the study. Results Twenty-three people with lived experience of depression and twenty-two GPs were interviewed. Three themes are presented in this paper: perceived determinants of depression course (participants viewed environmental, social and personal factors as being most significant); relapse risk and prevention (relapse was considered important but not consistently or routinely discussed in general practice consultations); and the key role of the GP-patient relationship and communication. Conceptually, relapse was perceived as having limited meaning and usefulness in primary care, due to the implication of an episodic, discrete course not recognised by many patients and an over-reliance on biomedical diagnosis. Longer-term follow-up and monitoring of depression could be improved in primary care. Conclusion We provide an evidence-informed framework to improve practice systems and GP consultations to improve longer-term care and support for people with depression. Going forwards, brief scalable relapse prevention interventions are needed to improve the ongoing care of people with depression in primary care; implementing these would require additional primary care resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0384\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 复发是抑郁症造成的临床和社会负担之一。目前还不太清楚在初级医疗中,患者和全科医生之间是如何管理和讨论复发风险和预防的。目的 了解全科医生在多大程度上对复发风险和预防进行了讨论和管理。设计和设置 在全科医生中开展定性研究。方法 通过英国全科诊所招募参与者。通过半结构式访谈获得数据,并使用主题分析法对数据进行分析。患者和公众参与了研究的各个方面。结果 23 名抑郁症患者和 22 名全科医生接受了访谈。本文提出了三个主题:抑郁症病程的决定因素(参与者认为环境、社会和个人因素最为重要);复发风险和预防(复发被认为很重要,但在全科医生会诊中并未持续或定期讨论);以及全科医生与患者关系和沟通的关键作用。从概念上讲,复发被认为在初级保健中的意义和作用有限,这是因为复发是一个偶发的、不连续的过程,许多患者并不认识到这一点,而且过度依赖生物医学诊断。基层医疗机构可以对抑郁症进行更长期的跟踪和监测。结论 我们提供了一个以证据为依据的框架,以改进实践系统和全科医生咨询,从而改善对抑郁症患者的长期护理和支持。展望未来,需要采取简短、可扩展的预防复发干预措施,以改善初级保健中对抑郁症患者的持续护理;实施这些措施需要额外的初级保健资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of primary care in depression relapse: a qualitative study.

Background Relapse contributes to the clinical and societal burden associated with depression. It is not well understood how relapse risk and prevention are managed and discussed between patients and general practitioners in primary care. Aim To understand the extent to which relapse risk and prevention are discussed and managed in general practice. Design and Setting Qualitative study in general practice. Method Participants were recruited through UK general practices. Data were generated using semi-structured interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Patient and public involvement informed all aspects of the study. Results Twenty-three people with lived experience of depression and twenty-two GPs were interviewed. Three themes are presented in this paper: perceived determinants of depression course (participants viewed environmental, social and personal factors as being most significant); relapse risk and prevention (relapse was considered important but not consistently or routinely discussed in general practice consultations); and the key role of the GP-patient relationship and communication. Conceptually, relapse was perceived as having limited meaning and usefulness in primary care, due to the implication of an episodic, discrete course not recognised by many patients and an over-reliance on biomedical diagnosis. Longer-term follow-up and monitoring of depression could be improved in primary care. Conclusion We provide an evidence-informed framework to improve practice systems and GP consultations to improve longer-term care and support for people with depression. Going forwards, brief scalable relapse prevention interventions are needed to improve the ongoing care of people with depression in primary care; implementing these would require additional primary care resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信