恩杂鲁胺和阿比特龙加泼尼松龙治疗阉割耐药前列腺癌的剂量调整:PCaENABLE研究的子分析。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Prostate Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1002/pros.24796
Nobumichi Tanaka, Kouji Izumi, Yasushi Nakai, Takashi Shima, Yuki Kato, Koji Mita, Manabu Kamiyama, Shogo Inoue, Seiji Hoshi, Takehiko Okamura, Yuko Yoshio, Hideki Enokida, Ippei Chikazawa, Noriyasu Kawai, Kohei Hashimoto, Takashi Fukagai, Kazuyoshi Shigehara, Shizuko Takahara, Atsushi Mizokami
{"title":"恩杂鲁胺和阿比特龙加泼尼松龙治疗阉割耐药前列腺癌的剂量调整:PCaENABLE研究的子分析。","authors":"Nobumichi Tanaka, Kouji Izumi, Yasushi Nakai, Takashi Shima, Yuki Kato, Koji Mita, Manabu Kamiyama, Shogo Inoue, Seiji Hoshi, Takehiko Okamura, Yuko Yoshio, Hideki Enokida, Ippei Chikazawa, Noriyasu Kawai, Kohei Hashimoto, Takashi Fukagai, Kazuyoshi Shigehara, Shizuko Takahara, Atsushi Mizokami","doi":"10.1002/pros.24796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A head-to-head comparison between enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) revealed similar survival benefits for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in the ENABLE study for PCa. Considering that a dose reduction of ENZ and ABI has demonstrated sufficient inhibitory ability of androgen receptor (AR) signaling, we analyzed the efficacy of modified doses of these agents in the ENABLE study for PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that was conducted in Japan analyzed the prespecified survival endpoints, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate ( ≥50% decline from baseline), and safety profile in patients treated with modified doses (ENZ ≤ 120 mg/day, ABI ≤ 750 mg/day) compared with those treated with a standard dose (ENZ 160 mg/day, ABI 1000 mg/day) as a starting dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 92 patients in each arm were treated and analyzed; 16 patients were treated with a modified dose in both the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively. Moreover, 32 patients treated with modified doses showed a significantly better time to PSA progression (TTPP) and overall survival (OS) compared with the 152 patients treated with a standard dose (HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.27-0.83, p = 0.0379, and HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.19-0.63, p = 0.0162). Despite a significantly longer TTPP in the modified ABI group than in the standard ABI group (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.14-0.62, p = 0.0248), no significant difference was observed in the TTPP between the modified and standard ENZ groups (p = 0.5366). Furthermore, similar adverse event rates and grades were observed in each treatment dose group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified doses of ABI showed better TTPP than the standard dose of ABI and may be a potential treatment option for CRPC patients; however, its mechanism is still unclear, although its ability to suppress AR signaling is equivalent to that of a standard dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose modification in enzalutamide and abiraterone plus prednisolone for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A subanalysis from the ENABLE study for PCa.\",\"authors\":\"Nobumichi Tanaka, Kouji Izumi, Yasushi Nakai, Takashi Shima, Yuki Kato, Koji Mita, Manabu Kamiyama, Shogo Inoue, Seiji Hoshi, Takehiko Okamura, Yuko Yoshio, Hideki Enokida, Ippei Chikazawa, Noriyasu Kawai, Kohei Hashimoto, Takashi Fukagai, Kazuyoshi Shigehara, Shizuko Takahara, Atsushi Mizokami\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.24796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A head-to-head comparison between enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) revealed similar survival benefits for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in the ENABLE study for PCa. Considering that a dose reduction of ENZ and ABI has demonstrated sufficient inhibitory ability of androgen receptor (AR) signaling, we analyzed the efficacy of modified doses of these agents in the ENABLE study for PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that was conducted in Japan analyzed the prespecified survival endpoints, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate ( ≥50% decline from baseline), and safety profile in patients treated with modified doses (ENZ ≤ 120 mg/day, ABI ≤ 750 mg/day) compared with those treated with a standard dose (ENZ 160 mg/day, ABI 1000 mg/day) as a starting dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 92 patients in each arm were treated and analyzed; 16 patients were treated with a modified dose in both the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively. Moreover, 32 patients treated with modified doses showed a significantly better time to PSA progression (TTPP) and overall survival (OS) compared with the 152 patients treated with a standard dose (HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.27-0.83, p = 0.0379, and HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.19-0.63, p = 0.0162). Despite a significantly longer TTPP in the modified ABI group than in the standard ABI group (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.14-0.62, p = 0.0248), no significant difference was observed in the TTPP between the modified and standard ENZ groups (p = 0.5366). Furthermore, similar adverse event rates and grades were observed in each treatment dose group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified doses of ABI showed better TTPP than the standard dose of ABI and may be a potential treatment option for CRPC patients; however, its mechanism is still unclear, although its ability to suppress AR signaling is equivalent to that of a standard dose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24796\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.24796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在治疗前列腺癌的ENABLE研究中,恩杂鲁胺(ENZ)和阿比特龙加泼尼松龙(ABI)的头对头比较显示,对阉割耐药前列腺癌(CRPC)的生存获益相似。考虑到减少 ENZ 和 ABI 的剂量已显示出对雄激素受体(AR)信号转导有足够的抑制能力,我们分析了在 PCa 的ENABLE 研究中这些药物调整剂量的疗效:这项由研究者发起、在日本进行的多中心随机对照试验分析了预设的生存终点、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)应答率(与基线相比下降≥50%)以及改良剂量(ENZ≤120毫克/天,ABI≤750毫克/天)与标准剂量(ENZ 160毫克/天,ABI 1000毫克/天)作为起始剂量的患者的安全性:每个治疗组共有 92 名患者接受了治疗和分析;在 ENZ 和 ABI 治疗组中,分别有 16 名患者接受了调整剂量的治疗。此外,与接受标准剂量治疗的152名患者相比,接受改良剂量治疗的32名患者的PSA进展时间(TTPP)和总生存期(OS)明显更长(HR 0.47,95%CI 0.27-0.83,p = 0.0379;HR 0.35,95%CI 0.19-0.63,p = 0.0162)。尽管改良 ABI 组的 TTPP 明显长于标准 ABI 组(HR 0.29,95%CI 0.14-0.62,p = 0.0248),但改良 ENZ 组和标准 ENZ 组的 TTPP 并无明显差异(p = 0.5366)。此外,各治疗剂量组的不良事件发生率和等级相似:结论:改良剂量的ABI比标准剂量的ABI显示出更好的TTPP,可能是CRPC患者的一种潜在治疗选择;然而,尽管其抑制AR信号转导的能力与标准剂量相当,但其机制仍不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dose modification in enzalutamide and abiraterone plus prednisolone for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A subanalysis from the ENABLE study for PCa.

Background: A head-to-head comparison between enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) revealed similar survival benefits for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in the ENABLE study for PCa. Considering that a dose reduction of ENZ and ABI has demonstrated sufficient inhibitory ability of androgen receptor (AR) signaling, we analyzed the efficacy of modified doses of these agents in the ENABLE study for PCa.

Methods: This investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that was conducted in Japan analyzed the prespecified survival endpoints, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate ( ≥50% decline from baseline), and safety profile in patients treated with modified doses (ENZ ≤ 120 mg/day, ABI ≤ 750 mg/day) compared with those treated with a standard dose (ENZ 160 mg/day, ABI 1000 mg/day) as a starting dose.

Results: In total, 92 patients in each arm were treated and analyzed; 16 patients were treated with a modified dose in both the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively. Moreover, 32 patients treated with modified doses showed a significantly better time to PSA progression (TTPP) and overall survival (OS) compared with the 152 patients treated with a standard dose (HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.27-0.83, p = 0.0379, and HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.19-0.63, p = 0.0162). Despite a significantly longer TTPP in the modified ABI group than in the standard ABI group (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.14-0.62, p = 0.0248), no significant difference was observed in the TTPP between the modified and standard ENZ groups (p = 0.5366). Furthermore, similar adverse event rates and grades were observed in each treatment dose group.

Conclusions: The modified doses of ABI showed better TTPP than the standard dose of ABI and may be a potential treatment option for CRPC patients; however, its mechanism is still unclear, although its ability to suppress AR signaling is equivalent to that of a standard dose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate
Prostate 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信