与医疗保健相关的储蓄账户、医疗保健支出和税收支出。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dong Ding, Sherry Glied
{"title":"与医疗保健相关的储蓄账户、医疗保健支出和税收支出。","authors":"Dong Ding, Sherry Glied","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Approximately 30% of US families with employer-sponsored health insurance, disproportionately drawn from high-income groups, benefit from flexible spending accounts (FSAs) or health savings accounts (HSAs). The combined association through both out-of-pocket spending and premiums of these tax-favored accounts with health care expenditures and tax expenditures remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the health care and health-related tax expenditures among families holding FSAs, HSAs, or neither type of account.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used family-level data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019, and conducted regression models, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, chronic conditions, prior health care expenditures, and marginal tax rates to analyze how holding tax-favored accounts is associated with families' health care spending and tax expenditures. The sample was restricted to families included in the survey for 2 years, with no members 65 years or older, and with at least 1 policyholder covered (only) by full-year employer-sponsored insurance. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Holding FSAs or HSAs.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Out-of-pocket and insurance-paid health expenditures overall and by service were measured. Health-related tax expenditures were based on tax-excluded insurance premiums and tax-sheltered out-of-pocket expenses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 17 038 families included in the study sample, 2628 held FSAs (weighted 17%) and 1845 (weighted 13%) held HSAs. In regression-adjusted models, families with FSAs spent a mean of 20% or $2033 (95% CI, $789-$3276) more on health care annually than non-account holding families, largely due to increased insurer-paid expenses. Families with HSAs spent a mean of 44% or $697 (95% CI, $521-$873) more on out-of-pocket expenditures and had insignificantly higher insurance-paid expenditures than families without accounts, resulting in overall expenditures comparable to those of non-account holders. The additional tax expenditures associated with FSAs were a mean of $1306 (95% CI, $536-$2076) annually per family. Both types of funds were associated with significant increases in tax expenditures from additional office-based visits ($445 [95% CI, $244-$645] for FSAs and $174 [95% CI, $11-$336] for HSAs), outpatient visits ($330 [95% CI, $132-$528] for FSAs and $250 [95% CI, $15-$485] for HSAs), dental visits ($180 [95% CI, $126-$233] for FSAs and $165 [95% CI, $104-$226] for HSAs), and vision care ($36 [95% CI, $28-$45] for FSAs and $52 [95% CI, $40-$64] for HSAs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Participation in FSAs is associated with higher health care expenditures and tax expenditures, while HSAs are not associated with reduced expenditures. Tax policy could be better targeted to enhance insurance coverage and health care accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 9","pages":"e242896"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Care-Related Savings Accounts, Health Care Expenditures, and Tax Expenditures.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Ding, Sherry Glied\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Approximately 30% of US families with employer-sponsored health insurance, disproportionately drawn from high-income groups, benefit from flexible spending accounts (FSAs) or health savings accounts (HSAs). The combined association through both out-of-pocket spending and premiums of these tax-favored accounts with health care expenditures and tax expenditures remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the health care and health-related tax expenditures among families holding FSAs, HSAs, or neither type of account.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used family-level data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019, and conducted regression models, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, chronic conditions, prior health care expenditures, and marginal tax rates to analyze how holding tax-favored accounts is associated with families' health care spending and tax expenditures. The sample was restricted to families included in the survey for 2 years, with no members 65 years or older, and with at least 1 policyholder covered (only) by full-year employer-sponsored insurance. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Holding FSAs or HSAs.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Out-of-pocket and insurance-paid health expenditures overall and by service were measured. Health-related tax expenditures were based on tax-excluded insurance premiums and tax-sheltered out-of-pocket expenses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 17 038 families included in the study sample, 2628 held FSAs (weighted 17%) and 1845 (weighted 13%) held HSAs. In regression-adjusted models, families with FSAs spent a mean of 20% or $2033 (95% CI, $789-$3276) more on health care annually than non-account holding families, largely due to increased insurer-paid expenses. Families with HSAs spent a mean of 44% or $697 (95% CI, $521-$873) more on out-of-pocket expenditures and had insignificantly higher insurance-paid expenditures than families without accounts, resulting in overall expenditures comparable to those of non-account holders. The additional tax expenditures associated with FSAs were a mean of $1306 (95% CI, $536-$2076) annually per family. Both types of funds were associated with significant increases in tax expenditures from additional office-based visits ($445 [95% CI, $244-$645] for FSAs and $174 [95% CI, $11-$336] for HSAs), outpatient visits ($330 [95% CI, $132-$528] for FSAs and $250 [95% CI, $15-$485] for HSAs), dental visits ($180 [95% CI, $126-$233] for FSAs and $165 [95% CI, $104-$226] for HSAs), and vision care ($36 [95% CI, $28-$45] for FSAs and $52 [95% CI, $40-$64] for HSAs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Participation in FSAs is associated with higher health care expenditures and tax expenditures, while HSAs are not associated with reduced expenditures. Tax policy could be better targeted to enhance insurance coverage and health care accessibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"e242896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415789/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:约有 30% 的美国家庭拥有雇主提供的医疗保险,其中大部分来自高收入群体,这些家庭受益于灵活支出账户 (FSA) 或健康储蓄账户 (HSA)。这些税收优惠账户的自付支出和保费与医疗支出和税收支出之间的综合关联仍不确定:比较持有 FSA、HSA 或两种账户的家庭的医疗保健支出和与医疗保健相关的税收支出:这项横断面研究使用了医疗支出小组调查(Medical Expenditure Panel Survey)中 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日的家庭层面数据,并在控制人口和社会经济特征、慢性病、之前的医疗支出和边际税率的基础上建立了回归模型,以分析持有税收优惠账户与家庭医疗支出和税收支出之间的关系。样本仅限于连续两年参与调查的家庭,家庭成员中没有 65 岁或以上的老人,且至少有一名投保人参加了全年的雇主保险。数据分析时间为 2023 年 12 月 1 日至 2024 年 4 月 30 日:主要结果和衡量标准:主要结果和衡量标准:衡量自付和保险支付的总体医疗支出和服务支出。与健康相关的税收支出基于不含税的保险费和含税的自付费用:在纳入研究样本的 17 038 个家庭中,2628 个家庭持有 FSA(加权 17%),1845 个家庭持有 HSA(加权 13%)。在回归调整模型中,与未持有 FSA 账户的家庭相比,持有 FSA 账户的家庭每年在医疗保健方面的平均花费要高出 20% 或 2033 美元(95% CI,789-3276 美元),这主要是由于保险人支付的费用增加了。与未持有账户的家庭相比,持有 HSA 的家庭平均自付支出高出 44% 或 697 美元(95% CI,521-873 美元),而保险支付支出则高出不多,因此总体支出与未持有账户的家庭相当。与 FSA 相关的额外税收支出平均为每个家庭每年 1306 美元(95% CI,536-2076 美元)。这两类基金都与以下税收支出的大幅增加有关:额外的门诊(FSA 为 445 美元 [95% CI,244-645 美元],HSA 为 174 美元 [95% CI,11-336 美元])、门诊(FSA 为 330 美元 [95% CI,132-528 美元],HSA 为 174 美元 [95% CI,11-336 美元])、美元)、牙科就诊(FSA 为 180 美元[95% CI,126-233 美元],HSA 为 165 美元[95% CI,104-226 美元])和视力保健(FSA 为 36 美元[95% CI,28-45 美元],HSA 为 52 美元[95% CI,40-64 美元])。结论及相关性:参与 FSAs 与更高的医疗支出和税收支出相关,而 HSAs 与支出减少无关。税收政策可以更有针对性地提高保险覆盖率和医疗保健的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Care-Related Savings Accounts, Health Care Expenditures, and Tax Expenditures.

Importance: Approximately 30% of US families with employer-sponsored health insurance, disproportionately drawn from high-income groups, benefit from flexible spending accounts (FSAs) or health savings accounts (HSAs). The combined association through both out-of-pocket spending and premiums of these tax-favored accounts with health care expenditures and tax expenditures remain uncertain.

Objective: To compare the health care and health-related tax expenditures among families holding FSAs, HSAs, or neither type of account.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used family-level data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2019, and conducted regression models, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, chronic conditions, prior health care expenditures, and marginal tax rates to analyze how holding tax-favored accounts is associated with families' health care spending and tax expenditures. The sample was restricted to families included in the survey for 2 years, with no members 65 years or older, and with at least 1 policyholder covered (only) by full-year employer-sponsored insurance. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2023, to April 30, 2024.

Exposures: Holding FSAs or HSAs.

Main outcomes and measures: Out-of-pocket and insurance-paid health expenditures overall and by service were measured. Health-related tax expenditures were based on tax-excluded insurance premiums and tax-sheltered out-of-pocket expenses.

Results: Of the 17 038 families included in the study sample, 2628 held FSAs (weighted 17%) and 1845 (weighted 13%) held HSAs. In regression-adjusted models, families with FSAs spent a mean of 20% or $2033 (95% CI, $789-$3276) more on health care annually than non-account holding families, largely due to increased insurer-paid expenses. Families with HSAs spent a mean of 44% or $697 (95% CI, $521-$873) more on out-of-pocket expenditures and had insignificantly higher insurance-paid expenditures than families without accounts, resulting in overall expenditures comparable to those of non-account holders. The additional tax expenditures associated with FSAs were a mean of $1306 (95% CI, $536-$2076) annually per family. Both types of funds were associated with significant increases in tax expenditures from additional office-based visits ($445 [95% CI, $244-$645] for FSAs and $174 [95% CI, $11-$336] for HSAs), outpatient visits ($330 [95% CI, $132-$528] for FSAs and $250 [95% CI, $15-$485] for HSAs), dental visits ($180 [95% CI, $126-$233] for FSAs and $165 [95% CI, $104-$226] for HSAs), and vision care ($36 [95% CI, $28-$45] for FSAs and $52 [95% CI, $40-$64] for HSAs).

Conclusions and relevance: Participation in FSAs is associated with higher health care expenditures and tax expenditures, while HSAs are not associated with reduced expenditures. Tax policy could be better targeted to enhance insurance coverage and health care accessibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信