食品系统和非食品系统基本工作人员在 COVID-19 疫苗接种率、态度和经验方面的差异。

IF 1.6 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Brianna L Smarsh, David Yankey, Mei-Chuan Hung, Heidi M Blanck, Jennifer L Kriss, Michael A Flynn, Peng-Jun Lu, Sherri McGarry, Adrienne C Eastlake, Alfonso Rodriguez Lainz, James A Singleton, Jennifer M Lincoln
{"title":"食品系统和非食品系统基本工作人员在 COVID-19 疫苗接种率、态度和经验方面的差异。","authors":"Brianna L Smarsh, David Yankey, Mei-Chuan Hung, Heidi M Blanck, Jennifer L Kriss, Michael A Flynn, Peng-Jun Lu, Sherri McGarry, Adrienne C Eastlake, Alfonso Rodriguez Lainz, James A Singleton, Jennifer M Lincoln","doi":"10.5304/jafscd.2024.132.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected the health of food system (FS) essential workers compared with other essential and non-essential workers. Even greater disparity exists for workers in certain FS work settings and for certain FS worker subpopulations. We analyzed essential worker respondents (<i>n</i> = 151,789) in May-November 2021 data from the National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM) to assess and characterize COVID-19 vaccination uptake (≥1 dose) and intent (reachable, reluctant), attitudes about COVID-19 and the vaccine, and experiences and difficulties getting the vaccine. We compared rates, overall and by certain characteristics, between workers of the same group, and between FS (<i>n</i> = 17,414) and non-food system (NFS) worker groups (<i>n</i> = 134,375), to determine if differences exist. FS worker groups were classified as \"agriculture, forestry, fishing, or hunting\" (AFFH; <i>n</i> = 2,730); \"food manufacturing facility\" (FMF; <i>n</i> = 3,495); and \"food and beverage store\" (FBS; <i>n</i> = 11,189). Compared with NFS workers, significantly lower percentages of FS workers reported ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine or vaccine requirements at work or school, but overall vaccine experiences and difficulties among vaccinated FS workers were statistically similar to NFS workers. When we examined intent regarding COVID-19 vaccination among unvaccinated FS workers compared with NFS counterparts, we found a higher percentage of FMF and FBS workers were reachable whereas a higher percentage of AFFH workers were reluctant about vaccination, with differences by sociodemographic characteristics. Overall, results showed differences in uptake, intent, and attitudes between worker groups and by some sociodemographic characteristics. The findings reflect the diversity of FS workers and underscore the importance of collecting occupational data to assess health inequalities and of tailoring efforts to worker groups to improve confidence and uptake of vaccinations for infectious diseases such as COVID-19. The findings can inform future research, adult infectious disease interventions, and emergency management planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, attitudes, and experiences between food system and non-food system essential workers.\",\"authors\":\"Brianna L Smarsh, David Yankey, Mei-Chuan Hung, Heidi M Blanck, Jennifer L Kriss, Michael A Flynn, Peng-Jun Lu, Sherri McGarry, Adrienne C Eastlake, Alfonso Rodriguez Lainz, James A Singleton, Jennifer M Lincoln\",\"doi\":\"10.5304/jafscd.2024.132.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected the health of food system (FS) essential workers compared with other essential and non-essential workers. Even greater disparity exists for workers in certain FS work settings and for certain FS worker subpopulations. We analyzed essential worker respondents (<i>n</i> = 151,789) in May-November 2021 data from the National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM) to assess and characterize COVID-19 vaccination uptake (≥1 dose) and intent (reachable, reluctant), attitudes about COVID-19 and the vaccine, and experiences and difficulties getting the vaccine. We compared rates, overall and by certain characteristics, between workers of the same group, and between FS (<i>n</i> = 17,414) and non-food system (NFS) worker groups (<i>n</i> = 134,375), to determine if differences exist. FS worker groups were classified as \\\"agriculture, forestry, fishing, or hunting\\\" (AFFH; <i>n</i> = 2,730); \\\"food manufacturing facility\\\" (FMF; <i>n</i> = 3,495); and \\\"food and beverage store\\\" (FBS; <i>n</i> = 11,189). Compared with NFS workers, significantly lower percentages of FS workers reported ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine or vaccine requirements at work or school, but overall vaccine experiences and difficulties among vaccinated FS workers were statistically similar to NFS workers. When we examined intent regarding COVID-19 vaccination among unvaccinated FS workers compared with NFS counterparts, we found a higher percentage of FMF and FBS workers were reachable whereas a higher percentage of AFFH workers were reluctant about vaccination, with differences by sociodemographic characteristics. Overall, results showed differences in uptake, intent, and attitudes between worker groups and by some sociodemographic characteristics. The findings reflect the diversity of FS workers and underscore the importance of collecting occupational data to assess health inequalities and of tailoring efforts to worker groups to improve confidence and uptake of vaccinations for infectious diseases such as COVID-19. The findings can inform future research, adult infectious disease interventions, and emergency management planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403359/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2024.132.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2024.132.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他基本和非基本工作人员相比,COVID-19 大流行对食品系统(FS)基本工作人员的健康影响尤为严重。对于某些食品系统工作环境中的工人和某些食品系统工人亚群来说,这种差异甚至更大。我们分析了 2021 年 5 月至 11 月全国免疫接种调查成人 COVID 模块 (NIS-ACM) 的基本工人受访者(n = 151,789 人)的数据,以评估和描述 COVID-19 疫苗的接种率(≥1 剂)和接种意愿(可接种、不愿接种)、对 COVID-19 和疫苗的态度以及接种疫苗的经历和困难。我们比较了同一群体工人的总体接种率和某些特征的接种率,以及金融服务工人群体(n = 17,414)和非食品系统(NFS)工人群体(n = 134,375)的接种率,以确定是否存在差异。FS工人群体被划分为 "农业、林业、渔业或狩猎"(AFFH;n = 2,730);"食品制造设施"(FMF;n = 3,495);以及 "食品和饮料商店"(FBS;n = 11,189)。与 NFS 工人相比,FS 工人中报告 COVID-19 疫苗接种≥1 剂或工作或学校有接种要求的比例明显较低,但已接种疫苗的 FS 工人的总体接种经历和困难在统计学上与 NFS 工人相似。当我们研究未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的 FS 工人与 NFS 工人的接种意向时,我们发现 FMF 和 FBS 工人中可接种的比例较高,而 AFFH 工人中不愿接种的比例较高,社会人口特征也存在差异。总体而言,研究结果表明,不同工人群体在接种率、接种意愿和接种态度方面存在差异,某些社会人口特征也存在差异。研究结果反映了金融服务工人的多样性,并强调了收集职业数据以评估健康不平等现象的重要性,以及针对工人群体开展工作以提高对 COVID-19 等传染病疫苗接种的信心和接种率的重要性。研究结果可为今后的研究、成人传染病干预措施和应急管理规划提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, attitudes, and experiences between food system and non-food system essential workers.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected the health of food system (FS) essential workers compared with other essential and non-essential workers. Even greater disparity exists for workers in certain FS work settings and for certain FS worker subpopulations. We analyzed essential worker respondents (n = 151,789) in May-November 2021 data from the National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM) to assess and characterize COVID-19 vaccination uptake (≥1 dose) and intent (reachable, reluctant), attitudes about COVID-19 and the vaccine, and experiences and difficulties getting the vaccine. We compared rates, overall and by certain characteristics, between workers of the same group, and between FS (n = 17,414) and non-food system (NFS) worker groups (n = 134,375), to determine if differences exist. FS worker groups were classified as "agriculture, forestry, fishing, or hunting" (AFFH; n = 2,730); "food manufacturing facility" (FMF; n = 3,495); and "food and beverage store" (FBS; n = 11,189). Compared with NFS workers, significantly lower percentages of FS workers reported ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine or vaccine requirements at work or school, but overall vaccine experiences and difficulties among vaccinated FS workers were statistically similar to NFS workers. When we examined intent regarding COVID-19 vaccination among unvaccinated FS workers compared with NFS counterparts, we found a higher percentage of FMF and FBS workers were reachable whereas a higher percentage of AFFH workers were reluctant about vaccination, with differences by sociodemographic characteristics. Overall, results showed differences in uptake, intent, and attitudes between worker groups and by some sociodemographic characteristics. The findings reflect the diversity of FS workers and underscore the importance of collecting occupational data to assess health inequalities and of tailoring efforts to worker groups to improve confidence and uptake of vaccinations for infectious diseases such as COVID-19. The findings can inform future research, adult infectious disease interventions, and emergency management planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信