Anne Karoline de Holanda Cavalcanti Pereira, Rayanna Thayse Florêncio Costa, Rafaella de Souza Leão, Bruno Gustavo da Silva Casado, Andre Ulisses Dantas Batista, Sandra Lúcia Dantas Moraes
{"title":"不同表面处理对 3D 打印牙齿和义齿基托之间粘接强度的影响。","authors":"Anne Karoline de Holanda Cavalcanti Pereira, Rayanna Thayse Florêncio Costa, Rafaella de Souza Leão, Bruno Gustavo da Silva Casado, Andre Ulisses Dantas Batista, Sandra Lúcia Dantas Moraes","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effects of different surface treatments and thermal cycling on the shear bond strength between 3D-printed teeth and denture bases.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>For the shear bond strength (SBS) test, the specimens were the maxillary central incisors (11 × 9 × 7 mm) bonded on a cylindrical base (20 × 25 mm). The control group was heat-cured polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (N = 20). The printed group was divided into five subgroups (N = 20): no treatment, sandblasting with aluminum oxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), methyl methacrylate monomer, acetone, and adhesive with urethane dimethacrylate. Half of the samples were subjected to 2000 thermal cycling cycles, and all samples were subjected to the SBS test. The failure mode was established as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed through stereomicroscopic analysis. The surface roughness test (Sa) was performed using optical profilometry, and the rectangular specimens (14 × 14 × 2.5 mm) were divided into four groups according to the surface treatments (N = 7 per group). Paired T and Wilcoxon tests were conducted to perform comparisons within the same group. The Kruskal-Wallis and Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner post-hoc tests were conducted to compare the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> sandblasting in the 3D-printed groups achieved high SBS values comparable to those of the control group in the thermal cycled (p = 0.962) and non-thermal cycled samples (p = 0.319). It was the only treatment capable of modifying the surface of the 3D-printed resin, thereby increasing the roughness (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sandblasting is recommended to increase the bond strength between the tooth and denture bases.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of different surface treatments on bond strength between 3D-printed teeth and denture base.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Karoline de Holanda Cavalcanti Pereira, Rayanna Thayse Florêncio Costa, Rafaella de Souza Leão, Bruno Gustavo da Silva Casado, Andre Ulisses Dantas Batista, Sandra Lúcia Dantas Moraes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.13941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effects of different surface treatments and thermal cycling on the shear bond strength between 3D-printed teeth and denture bases.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>For the shear bond strength (SBS) test, the specimens were the maxillary central incisors (11 × 9 × 7 mm) bonded on a cylindrical base (20 × 25 mm). The control group was heat-cured polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (N = 20). The printed group was divided into five subgroups (N = 20): no treatment, sandblasting with aluminum oxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), methyl methacrylate monomer, acetone, and adhesive with urethane dimethacrylate. Half of the samples were subjected to 2000 thermal cycling cycles, and all samples were subjected to the SBS test. The failure mode was established as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed through stereomicroscopic analysis. The surface roughness test (Sa) was performed using optical profilometry, and the rectangular specimens (14 × 14 × 2.5 mm) were divided into four groups according to the surface treatments (N = 7 per group). Paired T and Wilcoxon tests were conducted to perform comparisons within the same group. The Kruskal-Wallis and Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner post-hoc tests were conducted to compare the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> sandblasting in the 3D-printed groups achieved high SBS values comparable to those of the control group in the thermal cycled (p = 0.962) and non-thermal cycled samples (p = 0.319). It was the only treatment capable of modifying the surface of the 3D-printed resin, thereby increasing the roughness (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sandblasting is recommended to increase the bond strength between the tooth and denture bases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13941\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of different surface treatments on bond strength between 3D-printed teeth and denture base.
Purpose: To investigate the effects of different surface treatments and thermal cycling on the shear bond strength between 3D-printed teeth and denture bases.
Material and methods: For the shear bond strength (SBS) test, the specimens were the maxillary central incisors (11 × 9 × 7 mm) bonded on a cylindrical base (20 × 25 mm). The control group was heat-cured polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (N = 20). The printed group was divided into five subgroups (N = 20): no treatment, sandblasting with aluminum oxide (Al2O3), methyl methacrylate monomer, acetone, and adhesive with urethane dimethacrylate. Half of the samples were subjected to 2000 thermal cycling cycles, and all samples were subjected to the SBS test. The failure mode was established as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed through stereomicroscopic analysis. The surface roughness test (Sa) was performed using optical profilometry, and the rectangular specimens (14 × 14 × 2.5 mm) were divided into four groups according to the surface treatments (N = 7 per group). Paired T and Wilcoxon tests were conducted to perform comparisons within the same group. The Kruskal-Wallis and Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner post-hoc tests were conducted to compare the groups.
Results: Al2O3 sandblasting in the 3D-printed groups achieved high SBS values comparable to those of the control group in the thermal cycled (p = 0.962) and non-thermal cycled samples (p = 0.319). It was the only treatment capable of modifying the surface of the 3D-printed resin, thereby increasing the roughness (p = 0.016).
Conclusions: Sandblasting is recommended to increase the bond strength between the tooth and denture bases.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
