Ting-Ting Li, Hong-Su Zhou, Juan Li, Quan-Yuan Chang, Chen-Yang Zhai, Yu-Cong Liu, Nan Zhao, Ting-Hua Wang, Lin-Lin Xiong
{"title":"超声引导下大耳廓神经阻滞在中耳手术中的镇痛特性:前瞻性随机对照初步试验。","authors":"Ting-Ting Li, Hong-Su Zhou, Juan Li, Quan-Yuan Chang, Chen-Yang Zhai, Yu-Cong Liu, Nan Zhao, Ting-Hua Wang, Lin-Lin Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the analgesic characteristics of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve (GAN) block to further improve pain management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind preliminary clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven patients who underwent middle ear surgery were included in this study: 15 in the GAN block group (the large ear nerve block [NB] group) and 22 in the traditional anesthesia group (control [CON] group). After induction of anesthesia, the NB group was given an ultrasound-guided GAN block (0.25 % Ropivacaine 2 mL), while the CON group was exempt from the GAN block. The patient's basic information, perioperative information, the region, and numeric rating scale of postoperative pain (at 1 hour, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours), and adverse reactions were recorded. Repeated measurement analysis, t test, and Fisher exact probability method were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with the CON group, the numeric rating scale in the NB group was lower after surgery (1 hour: 1.18 ± 0.35 vs 0.27 ± 0.20, P = .023; 6 hours: 1.82 ± 0.37 vs 1.13 ± 0.39, P = .203; 12 hours: 1.05 ± 0.19 vs 0.20 ± 0.10, P < .001; 24 hours: 0.55 ± 0.17 vs 0.13 ± 0.09, P = .029). In the NB group, the region of pain was merely concentrated in the ear canal. In the CON group, the pain extended to areas outside the ear canal, such as tragus and mastoid (at 12 hours, P = .006). There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided GAN block can relieve patients' pain after middle ear surgery, especially in the area outside the ear canal.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic Characteristics of Ultrasound-guided Great Auricular Nerve Block in Middle Ear Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Preliminary Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Ting Li, Hong-Su Zhou, Juan Li, Quan-Yuan Chang, Chen-Yang Zhai, Yu-Cong Liu, Nan Zhao, Ting-Hua Wang, Lin-Lin Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the analgesic characteristics of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve (GAN) block to further improve pain management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind preliminary clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven patients who underwent middle ear surgery were included in this study: 15 in the GAN block group (the large ear nerve block [NB] group) and 22 in the traditional anesthesia group (control [CON] group). After induction of anesthesia, the NB group was given an ultrasound-guided GAN block (0.25 % Ropivacaine 2 mL), while the CON group was exempt from the GAN block. The patient's basic information, perioperative information, the region, and numeric rating scale of postoperative pain (at 1 hour, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours), and adverse reactions were recorded. Repeated measurement analysis, t test, and Fisher exact probability method were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with the CON group, the numeric rating scale in the NB group was lower after surgery (1 hour: 1.18 ± 0.35 vs 0.27 ± 0.20, P = .023; 6 hours: 1.82 ± 0.37 vs 1.13 ± 0.39, P = .203; 12 hours: 1.05 ± 0.19 vs 0.20 ± 0.10, P < .001; 24 hours: 0.55 ± 0.17 vs 0.13 ± 0.09, P = .029). In the NB group, the region of pain was merely concentrated in the ear canal. In the CON group, the pain extended to areas outside the ear canal, such as tragus and mastoid (at 12 hours, P = .006). There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound-guided GAN block can relieve patients' pain after middle ear surgery, especially in the area outside the ear canal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.107\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨超声引导下大耳廓神经(GAN)阻滞的镇痛特性,以进一步改善疼痛管理:单中心、前瞻性、随机对照、双盲初步临床试验:本研究共纳入 37 名接受中耳手术的患者:GAN阻滞组(大耳神经阻滞[NB]组)15人,传统麻醉组(对照[CON]组)22人。麻醉诱导后,NB 组在超声引导下进行 GAN 阻滞(0.25 % 罗哌卡因 2 mL),而 CON 组则无需进行 GAN 阻滞。记录患者的基本信息、围术期信息、术后疼痛的区域和数字评分表(1 小时、6 小时、12 小时和 24 小时)以及不良反应。统计分析采用重复测量分析、t 检验和费雪精确概率法:与 CON 组相比,NB 组术后的数字评分量表较低(1 小时:1.18 ± 0.35 vs 1.18 ± 0.35):1小时:1.18 ± 0.35 vs 0.27 ± 0.20,P = .023;6小时:1.82 ± 0.37 vs 0.27 ± 0.20,P = .023:1小时:1.18 ± 0.35 vs 0.27 ± 0.20,P = .023;6小时:1.82 ± 0.37 vs 1.13 ± 0.39,P = .203;12小时:1.05 ± 0.19 vs 0.20 ± 0.10,P 结论:超声引导下 GAN 阻滞可减轻中耳手术后患者的疼痛,尤其是耳道外区域的疼痛。
Analgesic Characteristics of Ultrasound-guided Great Auricular Nerve Block in Middle Ear Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Preliminary Trial.
Purpose: To explore the analgesic characteristics of ultrasound-guided great auricular nerve (GAN) block to further improve pain management.
Design: Single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind preliminary clinical trial.
Methods: Thirty-seven patients who underwent middle ear surgery were included in this study: 15 in the GAN block group (the large ear nerve block [NB] group) and 22 in the traditional anesthesia group (control [CON] group). After induction of anesthesia, the NB group was given an ultrasound-guided GAN block (0.25 % Ropivacaine 2 mL), while the CON group was exempt from the GAN block. The patient's basic information, perioperative information, the region, and numeric rating scale of postoperative pain (at 1 hour, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours), and adverse reactions were recorded. Repeated measurement analysis, t test, and Fisher exact probability method were used for statistical analysis.
Findings: Compared with the CON group, the numeric rating scale in the NB group was lower after surgery (1 hour: 1.18 ± 0.35 vs 0.27 ± 0.20, P = .023; 6 hours: 1.82 ± 0.37 vs 1.13 ± 0.39, P = .203; 12 hours: 1.05 ± 0.19 vs 0.20 ± 0.10, P < .001; 24 hours: 0.55 ± 0.17 vs 0.13 ± 0.09, P = .029). In the NB group, the region of pain was merely concentrated in the ear canal. In the CON group, the pain extended to areas outside the ear canal, such as tragus and mastoid (at 12 hours, P = .006). There was no significant difference in the risk of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups.
Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided GAN block can relieve patients' pain after middle ear surgery, especially in the area outside the ear canal.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.