临床怀疑有类风湿性关节炎风险的抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体阴性关节痛患者服用甲氨蝶呤后出现类风湿性关节炎:TREAT EARLIER 试验的 4 年数据。

IF 15 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Quirine A Dumoulin, Doortje I Krijbolder, Karen Visser, Leroy R Lard, Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
{"title":"临床怀疑有类风湿性关节炎风险的抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体阴性关节痛患者服用甲氨蝶呤后出现类风湿性关节炎:TREAT EARLIER 试验的 4 年数据。","authors":"Quirine A Dumoulin, Doortje I Krijbolder, Karen Visser, Leroy R Lard, Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil","doi":"10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00196-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prevention of rheumatoid arthritis has become a definitive target. However, whether prevention of anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-negative rheumatoid arthritis is possible is still unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a 1-year course of methotrexate on the development of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA-negative people with clinically suspect arthralgia and predicted increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this follow-up analysis, we used 4-year data from the TREAT EARLIER trial, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial conducted in the southwest region of the Netherlands from which we analysed data collected between April 16, 2015, and Sept 11, 2023. ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative adults aged 18 years or older with arthralgia and subclinical joint inflammation who were at risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis were eligible for enrolment. For TREAT EARLIER, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to active treatment or placebo. Active treatment consisted of a single intramuscular glucocorticoid injection (120 mg of methylprednisolone) upon inclusion, then a 1-year course of methotrexate. Placebo consisted of a single placebo injection followed by a 1-year course of placebo tablets. Trial visits occurred every 4 months during the first 2 years, at which clinical and questionnaire data were collected. Total follow-up was 4 years. For this analysis, participants were stratified via a prediction model into low risk, increased risk, and high risk of developing persistent, clinically apparent inflammatory arthritis. The primary outcome was development of rheumatoid arthritis, defined as the presence of clinically apparent inflammatory arthritis and clinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, and was assessed in all TREAT EARLIER participants. Severity of subclinical joint inflammation, physical functioning, and grip strength in ACPA-negative participants was studied in each risk group over a period of 2 years.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>901 people with clinically suspect arthralgia were assessed for eligibility and 236 were enrolled in TREAT EARLIER. All 236 participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and 217 (92%) completed 4-year follow-up. 154 (65%) of 236 participants were women and 82 (35%) were men, 182 (77%) were ACPA-negative and 54 (23%) were ACPA-positive. Of the 182 randomly assigned ACPA-negative participants, none were predicted to be at high risk of developing persistent, clinically apparent inflammatory arthritis, 66 (36%) at increased risk, and 116 (64%) at low risk. Of the 54 ACPA-positive participants, 24 (44%) were predicted to be at high risk, 30 (56%) at increased risk, and none at low risk. After 4 years, 52 (22%) of 236 participants had developed the primary outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (25 [21%] of 119 in the treatment group and 27 [23%] of 117 in the placebo group). Of the 66 ACPA-negative participants predicted to be at increased risk, three (9%) of 35 in the treatment group developed the primary outcome compared with nine (29%) of 31 in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·07-0·99; p=0·034). Of the 116 ACPA-negative participants predicted to be at low risk, four (8%) of 53 in the treatment group met the primary outcome compared with six (10%) of 63 in the placebo group (0·79, 0·22-2·80; p=0·71). Thus, after risk stratification, a 1-year course of methotrexate was associated with a reduced rate of development of ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis in participants with predicted increased risk of developing the disease. Subclinical joint inflammation, physical functioning, and grip strength persistently improved upon treatment in ACPA-negative participants with increased risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis, but not in those with low risk.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Risk stratification can be helpful in trials of ACPA-negative people with clinically suspect arthralgia to identify participants who could benefit from treatment to prevent development of rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Dutch Research Council-ZonMw, Dutch Arthritis Society.</p>","PeriodicalId":48540,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of rheumatoid arthritis after methotrexate in anticitrullinated protein antibody-negative people with clinically suspect arthralgia at risk of rheumatoid arthritis: 4-year data from the TREAT EARLIER trial.\",\"authors\":\"Quirine A Dumoulin, Doortje I Krijbolder, Karen Visser, Leroy R Lard, Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00196-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prevention of rheumatoid arthritis has become a definitive target. However, whether prevention of anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-negative rheumatoid arthritis is possible is still unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a 1-year course of methotrexate on the development of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA-negative people with clinically suspect arthralgia and predicted increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this follow-up analysis, we used 4-year data from the TREAT EARLIER trial, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial conducted in the southwest region of the Netherlands from which we analysed data collected between April 16, 2015, and Sept 11, 2023. ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative adults aged 18 years or older with arthralgia and subclinical joint inflammation who were at risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis were eligible for enrolment. For TREAT EARLIER, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to active treatment or placebo. Active treatment consisted of a single intramuscular glucocorticoid injection (120 mg of methylprednisolone) upon inclusion, then a 1-year course of methotrexate. Placebo consisted of a single placebo injection followed by a 1-year course of placebo tablets. Trial visits occurred every 4 months during the first 2 years, at which clinical and questionnaire data were collected. Total follow-up was 4 years. For this analysis, participants were stratified via a prediction model into low risk, increased risk, and high risk of developing persistent, clinically apparent inflammatory arthritis. The primary outcome was development of rheumatoid arthritis, defined as the presence of clinically apparent inflammatory arthritis and clinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, and was assessed in all TREAT EARLIER participants. Severity of subclinical joint inflammation, physical functioning, and grip strength in ACPA-negative participants was studied in each risk group over a period of 2 years.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>901 people with clinically suspect arthralgia were assessed for eligibility and 236 were enrolled in TREAT EARLIER. All 236 participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and 217 (92%) completed 4-year follow-up. 154 (65%) of 236 participants were women and 82 (35%) were men, 182 (77%) were ACPA-negative and 54 (23%) were ACPA-positive. Of the 182 randomly assigned ACPA-negative participants, none were predicted to be at high risk of developing persistent, clinically apparent inflammatory arthritis, 66 (36%) at increased risk, and 116 (64%) at low risk. Of the 54 ACPA-positive participants, 24 (44%) were predicted to be at high risk, 30 (56%) at increased risk, and none at low risk. After 4 years, 52 (22%) of 236 participants had developed the primary outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (25 [21%] of 119 in the treatment group and 27 [23%] of 117 in the placebo group). Of the 66 ACPA-negative participants predicted to be at increased risk, three (9%) of 35 in the treatment group developed the primary outcome compared with nine (29%) of 31 in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·07-0·99; p=0·034). Of the 116 ACPA-negative participants predicted to be at low risk, four (8%) of 53 in the treatment group met the primary outcome compared with six (10%) of 63 in the placebo group (0·79, 0·22-2·80; p=0·71). Thus, after risk stratification, a 1-year course of methotrexate was associated with a reduced rate of development of ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis in participants with predicted increased risk of developing the disease. Subclinical joint inflammation, physical functioning, and grip strength persistently improved upon treatment in ACPA-negative participants with increased risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis, but not in those with low risk.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Risk stratification can be helpful in trials of ACPA-negative people with clinically suspect arthralgia to identify participants who could benefit from treatment to prevent development of rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Dutch Research Council-ZonMw, Dutch Arthritis Society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00196-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00196-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预防类风湿性关节炎已成为一个明确的目标。然而,能否预防抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体(ACPA)阴性的类风湿关节炎仍是一个未知数。我们的目的是评估为期一年的甲氨蝶呤疗程对具有临床可疑关节痛和预测类风湿关节炎风险增加的 ACPA 阴性患者类风湿关节炎发展的疗效:在本次随访分析中,我们使用了TREAT EARLIER试验的4年数据,该试验是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、概念验证试验,在荷兰西南部地区进行,我们分析了2015年4月16日至2023年9月11日期间收集的数据。年龄在18岁或18岁以上、患有关节痛和亚临床关节炎症、有发展为类风湿性关节炎风险的ACPA阳性和ACPA阴性成人均符合报名条件。在 "早治疗 "项目中,参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受积极治疗或安慰剂治疗。积极治疗包括在入组时进行一次肌肉注射糖皮质激素(120 毫克甲泼尼龙),然后进行为期 1 年的甲氨蝶呤治疗。安慰剂包括一次安慰剂注射,然后服用安慰剂药片,疗程为 1 年。在头两年中,每 4 个月进行一次随访,收集临床和问卷调查数据。总随访时间为 4 年。在本次分析中,研究人员通过预测模型将参与者分为低风险、高风险和高风险人群,这些人群都有可能患上持续性、临床症状明显的炎症性关节炎。主要结果是类风湿性关节炎的发展,定义为出现临床明显的炎症性关节炎和临床诊断为类风湿性关节炎,并对所有 "早期治疗 "参与者进行了评估。对每个风险组中ACPA阴性参与者的亚临床关节炎症严重程度、身体功能和握力进行了为期2年的研究:901名临床疑似关节痛患者接受了资格评估,其中236人参加了 "早期治疗 "项目。所有 236 名参与者均被纳入意向治疗分析,其中 217 人(92%)完成了为期 4 年的随访。236 名参与者中有 154 名(65%)为女性,82 名(35%)为男性,182 名(77%)为 ACPA 阴性,54 名(23%)为 ACPA 阳性。在随机分配的 182 名 ACPA 阴性参与者中,没有人被预测为罹患持续性、临床表现明显的炎症性关节炎的高风险人群,66 人(36%)为高风险人群,116 人(64%)为低风险人群。在 54 名 ACPA 阳性参与者中,有 24 人(44%)被预测为高风险,30 人(56%)为高风险,没有人是低风险。4年后,236名参与者中有52人(22%)出现了类风湿关节炎这一主要结果(治疗组119人中有25人[21%],安慰剂组117人中有27人[23%])。在 66 名 ACPA 阴性参与者中,预测其风险会增加,治疗组 35 人中有 3 人(9%)出现主要结果,而安慰剂组 31 人中有 9 人(29%)出现主要结果(危险比 0-27,95% CI 0-07-0-99;P=0-034)。在116名被预测为低风险的ACPA阴性参与者中,治疗组53人中有4人(8%)出现主要结局,而安慰剂组63人中有6人(10%)出现主要结局(0-79,0-22-2-80;P=0-71)。因此,在对风险进行分层后,甲氨蝶呤 1 年疗程与降低 ACPA 阴性类风湿性关节炎发病率有关,而预测的发病风险会增加。在类风湿关节炎发病风险增加的ACPA阴性参与者中,亚临床关节炎症、身体功能和握力在治疗后持续得到改善,但在低风险参与者中则没有改善:风险分层有助于对临床疑似关节痛的ACPA阴性患者进行试验,以确定哪些患者可从治疗中获益,从而预防类风湿关节炎的发展:荷兰研究理事会-ZonMw、荷兰关节炎协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of rheumatoid arthritis after methotrexate in anticitrullinated protein antibody-negative people with clinically suspect arthralgia at risk of rheumatoid arthritis: 4-year data from the TREAT EARLIER trial.

Background: Prevention of rheumatoid arthritis has become a definitive target. However, whether prevention of anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-negative rheumatoid arthritis is possible is still unknown. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a 1-year course of methotrexate on the development of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA-negative people with clinically suspect arthralgia and predicted increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods: For this follow-up analysis, we used 4-year data from the TREAT EARLIER trial, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial conducted in the southwest region of the Netherlands from which we analysed data collected between April 16, 2015, and Sept 11, 2023. ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative adults aged 18 years or older with arthralgia and subclinical joint inflammation who were at risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis were eligible for enrolment. For TREAT EARLIER, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to active treatment or placebo. Active treatment consisted of a single intramuscular glucocorticoid injection (120 mg of methylprednisolone) upon inclusion, then a 1-year course of methotrexate. Placebo consisted of a single placebo injection followed by a 1-year course of placebo tablets. Trial visits occurred every 4 months during the first 2 years, at which clinical and questionnaire data were collected. Total follow-up was 4 years. For this analysis, participants were stratified via a prediction model into low risk, increased risk, and high risk of developing persistent, clinically apparent inflammatory arthritis. The primary outcome was development of rheumatoid arthritis, defined as the presence of clinically apparent inflammatory arthritis and clinical diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, and was assessed in all TREAT EARLIER participants. Severity of subclinical joint inflammation, physical functioning, and grip strength in ACPA-negative participants was studied in each risk group over a period of 2 years.

Findings: 901 people with clinically suspect arthralgia were assessed for eligibility and 236 were enrolled in TREAT EARLIER. All 236 participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and 217 (92%) completed 4-year follow-up. 154 (65%) of 236 participants were women and 82 (35%) were men, 182 (77%) were ACPA-negative and 54 (23%) were ACPA-positive. Of the 182 randomly assigned ACPA-negative participants, none were predicted to be at high risk of developing persistent, clinically apparent inflammatory arthritis, 66 (36%) at increased risk, and 116 (64%) at low risk. Of the 54 ACPA-positive participants, 24 (44%) were predicted to be at high risk, 30 (56%) at increased risk, and none at low risk. After 4 years, 52 (22%) of 236 participants had developed the primary outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (25 [21%] of 119 in the treatment group and 27 [23%] of 117 in the placebo group). Of the 66 ACPA-negative participants predicted to be at increased risk, three (9%) of 35 in the treatment group developed the primary outcome compared with nine (29%) of 31 in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·27, 95% CI 0·07-0·99; p=0·034). Of the 116 ACPA-negative participants predicted to be at low risk, four (8%) of 53 in the treatment group met the primary outcome compared with six (10%) of 63 in the placebo group (0·79, 0·22-2·80; p=0·71). Thus, after risk stratification, a 1-year course of methotrexate was associated with a reduced rate of development of ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis in participants with predicted increased risk of developing the disease. Subclinical joint inflammation, physical functioning, and grip strength persistently improved upon treatment in ACPA-negative participants with increased risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis, but not in those with low risk.

Interpretation: Risk stratification can be helpful in trials of ACPA-negative people with clinically suspect arthralgia to identify participants who could benefit from treatment to prevent development of rheumatoid arthritis.

Funding: Dutch Research Council-ZonMw, Dutch Arthritis Society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Rheumatology
Lancet Rheumatology RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
34.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: The Lancet Rheumatology, an independent journal, is dedicated to publishing content relevant to rheumatology specialists worldwide. It focuses on studies that advance clinical practice, challenge existing norms, and advocate for changes in health policy. The journal covers clinical research, particularly clinical trials, expert reviews, and thought-provoking commentary on the diagnosis, classification, management, and prevention of rheumatic diseases, including arthritis, musculoskeletal disorders, connective tissue diseases, and immune system disorders. Additionally, it publishes high-quality translational studies supported by robust clinical data, prioritizing those that identify potential new therapeutic targets, advance precision medicine efforts, or directly contribute to future clinical trials. With its strong clinical orientation, The Lancet Rheumatology serves as an independent voice for the rheumatology community, advocating strongly for the enhancement of patients' lives affected by rheumatic diseases worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信