加密货币交易与学术界生活质量、睡眠和压力水平的关系。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mehmet Uçar, Metin Yildiz, Necmettin Çiftci, Rukuye Aylaz
{"title":"加密货币交易与学术界生活质量、睡眠和压力水平的关系。","authors":"Mehmet Uçar, Metin Yildiz, Necmettin Çiftci, Rukuye Aylaz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryptocurrency trading has become popular with a large section of society, and the number of investors is increasing daily. It is critical to address the health impacts of cryptocurrency trading. Of particular importance is the issue of how such trading affects mental health. Research should be conducted on this topic, and where necessary, national governments should develop policies to combat these effects.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study was conducted to examine the relationship of cryptocurrency trading to quality of life, sleep, and stress levels in academics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with 437 academics working at a state university in Turkey. A Personal Information Form, the SF-12 Quality of Life Scale, the Scopa Sleep Scale, and the Perceived Stress Scale were used to collect data. These data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and G*Power 3.1 programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data obtained in this study were analyzed using SPSS program (SPSS-25). The effect size and r-effect size were calculated with Cohen’s d value. It was found that the mean scores for the SF-12 Quality of Life Scale were statistically lower in academics who traded cryptocurrency than in those who did not. The results showed that the mean scores for the Scopa Sleep Scale and Perceived Stress Scale were statistically higher in academics who traded cryptocurrency than in those who did not (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The academics who traded cryptocurrency had more negative health outcomes when compared to those who did not. Social awareness should be raised on the negative effects of cryptocurrency trading. A limitation of the study is that only data obtained from the statements of the participants were included in the study. The study may have some generalizability to other academics, but has less generalizability to populations other than academics.</p><p><strong>Implications for health care provision and use: </strong>Cryptocurrency trading is a significant public health problem. Although cryptocurrency trading has been found to profoundly affect mental health (sleep, stress, and quality of life), the current policies that address these problems are generally inadequate in terms of implementing and sustaining mental healthcare systems. The limitations of these health policies prevent many individuals in society from receiving high quality services.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>Health systems alone cannot solve the systemic problems that lead to the population’s dependence of mental health services and institutions. In order to solve this basic problem, it may be necessary for governments to increase individuals’ basic incomes and develop specific mental health policies for people engaged in cryptocurrency trading.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>Future studies should examine expert perspectives on mental health services in different contexts (e.g., behavioral addiction services), collect targeted feedback, and explore issues such as strategic planning and funding stability. Effective decisions should be made regarding the implementation and maintenance of treatment for behavioral addictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":"27 3","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship of Cryptocurrency Trading to Quality of Life, Sleep and Stress Levels in Academics\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Uçar, Metin Yildiz, Necmettin Çiftci, Rukuye Aylaz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cryptocurrency trading has become popular with a large section of society, and the number of investors is increasing daily. It is critical to address the health impacts of cryptocurrency trading. Of particular importance is the issue of how such trading affects mental health. Research should be conducted on this topic, and where necessary, national governments should develop policies to combat these effects.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study was conducted to examine the relationship of cryptocurrency trading to quality of life, sleep, and stress levels in academics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with 437 academics working at a state university in Turkey. A Personal Information Form, the SF-12 Quality of Life Scale, the Scopa Sleep Scale, and the Perceived Stress Scale were used to collect data. These data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and G*Power 3.1 programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data obtained in this study were analyzed using SPSS program (SPSS-25). The effect size and r-effect size were calculated with Cohen’s d value. It was found that the mean scores for the SF-12 Quality of Life Scale were statistically lower in academics who traded cryptocurrency than in those who did not. The results showed that the mean scores for the Scopa Sleep Scale and Perceived Stress Scale were statistically higher in academics who traded cryptocurrency than in those who did not (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The academics who traded cryptocurrency had more negative health outcomes when compared to those who did not. Social awareness should be raised on the negative effects of cryptocurrency trading. A limitation of the study is that only data obtained from the statements of the participants were included in the study. The study may have some generalizability to other academics, but has less generalizability to populations other than academics.</p><p><strong>Implications for health care provision and use: </strong>Cryptocurrency trading is a significant public health problem. Although cryptocurrency trading has been found to profoundly affect mental health (sleep, stress, and quality of life), the current policies that address these problems are generally inadequate in terms of implementing and sustaining mental healthcare systems. The limitations of these health policies prevent many individuals in society from receiving high quality services.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>Health systems alone cannot solve the systemic problems that lead to the population’s dependence of mental health services and institutions. In order to solve this basic problem, it may be necessary for governments to increase individuals’ basic incomes and develop specific mental health policies for people engaged in cryptocurrency trading.</p><p><strong>Implications for further research: </strong>Future studies should examine expert perspectives on mental health services in different contexts (e.g., behavioral addiction services), collect targeted feedback, and explore issues such as strategic planning and funding stability. Effective decisions should be made regarding the implementation and maintenance of treatment for behavioral addictions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"63-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围产期情绪和焦虑症(PMADs)的经济成本很高,其中包括减少的成本。 背景:加密货币交易已受到社会上很大一部分人的欢迎,投资者的数量每天都在增加。解决加密货币交易对健康的影响至关重要。尤其重要的是,这种交易如何影响心理健康。本研究旨在探讨加密货币交易与学者的生活质量、睡眠和压力水平之间的关系:这项描述性横断面研究的对象是在土耳其一所国立大学工作的 437 名学者。研究使用个人信息表、SF-12 生活质量量表、Scopa 睡眠量表和感知压力量表收集数据。这些数据使用 SPSS 25.0 和 G*Power 3.1 程序进行分析:本研究获得的数据使用 SPSS 程序(SPSS-25)进行分析。用 Cohen's d 值计算了效应大小和 r-效应大小。结果发现,SF-12 生活质量量表的平均得分在统计学上,交易加密货币的学者低于不交易加密货币的学者。结果显示,在统计学上,交易加密货币的学者的 Scopa 睡眠量表和感知压力量表的平均得分高于没有交易加密货币的学者(p 讨论:与没有进行加密货币交易的学者相比,进行加密货币交易的学者对健康的负面影响更大。应提高社会对加密货币交易负面影响的认识。这项研究的局限性在于,研究中只包含了从参与者的陈述中获得的数据。这项研究可能对其他学者有一定的普适性,但对学者以外人群的普适性较差:加密货币交易是一个重大的公共卫生问题。尽管加密货币交易被发现会严重影响心理健康(睡眠、压力和生活质量),但目前解决这些问题的政策在实施和维持心理保健系统方面普遍不足。这些医疗政策的局限性使得社会上许多人无法获得高质量的服务:单靠医疗系统无法解决导致人们依赖精神医疗服务和机构的系统性问题。为了解决这一基本问题,政府可能有必要增加个人的基本收入,并为从事加密货币交易的人制定专门的心理健康政策:未来的研究应考察专家对不同背景下心理健康服务的看法(如行为成瘾服务),收集有针对性的反馈意见,并探讨战略规划和资金稳定性等问题。应就行为成瘾治疗的实施和维持做出有效决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship of Cryptocurrency Trading to Quality of Life, Sleep and Stress Levels in Academics

Background: Cryptocurrency trading has become popular with a large section of society, and the number of investors is increasing daily. It is critical to address the health impacts of cryptocurrency trading. Of particular importance is the issue of how such trading affects mental health. Research should be conducted on this topic, and where necessary, national governments should develop policies to combat these effects.

Aims: This study was conducted to examine the relationship of cryptocurrency trading to quality of life, sleep, and stress levels in academics.

Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with 437 academics working at a state university in Turkey. A Personal Information Form, the SF-12 Quality of Life Scale, the Scopa Sleep Scale, and the Perceived Stress Scale were used to collect data. These data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and G*Power 3.1 programs.

Results: The data obtained in this study were analyzed using SPSS program (SPSS-25). The effect size and r-effect size were calculated with Cohen’s d value. It was found that the mean scores for the SF-12 Quality of Life Scale were statistically lower in academics who traded cryptocurrency than in those who did not. The results showed that the mean scores for the Scopa Sleep Scale and Perceived Stress Scale were statistically higher in academics who traded cryptocurrency than in those who did not (p<0.05).

Discussion: The academics who traded cryptocurrency had more negative health outcomes when compared to those who did not. Social awareness should be raised on the negative effects of cryptocurrency trading. A limitation of the study is that only data obtained from the statements of the participants were included in the study. The study may have some generalizability to other academics, but has less generalizability to populations other than academics.

Implications for health care provision and use: Cryptocurrency trading is a significant public health problem. Although cryptocurrency trading has been found to profoundly affect mental health (sleep, stress, and quality of life), the current policies that address these problems are generally inadequate in terms of implementing and sustaining mental healthcare systems. The limitations of these health policies prevent many individuals in society from receiving high quality services.

Implications for health policies: Health systems alone cannot solve the systemic problems that lead to the population’s dependence of mental health services and institutions. In order to solve this basic problem, it may be necessary for governments to increase individuals’ basic incomes and develop specific mental health policies for people engaged in cryptocurrency trading.

Implications for further research: Future studies should examine expert perspectives on mental health services in different contexts (e.g., behavioral addiction services), collect targeted feedback, and explore issues such as strategic planning and funding stability. Effective decisions should be made regarding the implementation and maintenance of treatment for behavioral addictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信