根据父母要求选择性减少无并发症双绒毛膜促性腺激素胎儿与持续双胎及妊娠结局:系统回顾和元分析》。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ioannis Mitrogiannis, Christos Chatzakis, Alexandros Sotiriadis, Stylianos Makrydimas, Alexandros Katrachouras, Athina Efthymiou, George Makrydimas
{"title":"根据父母要求选择性减少无并发症双绒毛膜促性腺激素胎儿与持续双胎及妊娠结局:系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Ioannis Mitrogiannis, Christos Chatzakis, Alexandros Sotiriadis, Stylianos Makrydimas, Alexandros Katrachouras, Athina Efthymiou, George Makrydimas","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the effect of elective fetal reduction in uncomplicated twin pregnancies on maternal-fetal outcomes, compared to ongoing twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus (until December 2023), and references of retrieved articles.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>Quality assessment of observational studies was conducted using the ROBINS-I tool. The overall quality of evidence was evaluated per GRADE. A quantitative analysis was performed for electively reduced dichorionic twins. Primary outcome was preterm birth. Secondary outcomes were gestational age at delivery, stillbirth and neonatal intensive care unit, gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, and pregnancy loss < 24 weeks of gestation. Summary odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects models were used for data synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial electronic search yielded 745 studies; 175 studies were further identified from reference citations. Five articles included appropriate data and were finally included in the meta-analysis. All studies were evaluated as \"moderate risk of bias\". Those five studies reported on dichorionic twins. Elective reduction in dichorionic twins reduces the risk for preterm birth <37 weeks (4 studies; n=1577; OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09-0.22, moderate-quality evidence), <34 weeks (3 studies; n=1335; OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.69; low-quality evidence), <32 weeks (3 studies; n=1335; OR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.11-0.88; low-quality evidence), gestational diabetes (3 studies; n= 1410; OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.97, low-quality evidence), pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders (2 studies; n=581; OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.83; low-quality evidence), birthweight <10<sup>th</sup> centile (2 studies; n=1163; OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.43; moderate-quality evidence), birthweight< 5<sup>th</sup> centile (2 studies; n=1163; OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19-0.50; low-quality evidence) and increases gestational age at delivery {four studies; n= 1362; MD 2.93 weeks, 95% CI 2.08-3.77; moderate-quality evidence}. The risk for stillbirth (2 studies; n= 1311; OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.43-6.21; very low-quality evidence) or pregnancy loss< 24 weeks (3 studies; n=1436; OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.55-2.58; very low-quality evidence) were not statistically significant different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to ongoing dichorionic twin pregnancies, dichorionic pregnancies that undergo elective selective fetal reduction are associated with lower incidences of preterm birth < 37 weeks, <34 weeks, <32 weeks, birthweight <10<sup>th</sup> centile and <5<sup>th</sup> centile, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and later gestational age at delivery by almost 3 weeks. These associations were often based on very low quality of evidence; so these results should be interpreted with caution and further studies should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selective Fetal Reduction of Uncomplicated Dichorionic Twins on Parental Request Versus Ongoing Twins and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Mitrogiannis, Christos Chatzakis, Alexandros Sotiriadis, Stylianos Makrydimas, Alexandros Katrachouras, Athina Efthymiou, George Makrydimas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the effect of elective fetal reduction in uncomplicated twin pregnancies on maternal-fetal outcomes, compared to ongoing twin pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus (until December 2023), and references of retrieved articles.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>Quality assessment of observational studies was conducted using the ROBINS-I tool. The overall quality of evidence was evaluated per GRADE. A quantitative analysis was performed for electively reduced dichorionic twins. Primary outcome was preterm birth. Secondary outcomes were gestational age at delivery, stillbirth and neonatal intensive care unit, gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, and pregnancy loss < 24 weeks of gestation. Summary odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects models were used for data synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial electronic search yielded 745 studies; 175 studies were further identified from reference citations. Five articles included appropriate data and were finally included in the meta-analysis. All studies were evaluated as \\\"moderate risk of bias\\\". Those five studies reported on dichorionic twins. Elective reduction in dichorionic twins reduces the risk for preterm birth <37 weeks (4 studies; n=1577; OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09-0.22, moderate-quality evidence), <34 weeks (3 studies; n=1335; OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.69; low-quality evidence), <32 weeks (3 studies; n=1335; OR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.11-0.88; low-quality evidence), gestational diabetes (3 studies; n= 1410; OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.97, low-quality evidence), pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders (2 studies; n=581; OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.83; low-quality evidence), birthweight <10<sup>th</sup> centile (2 studies; n=1163; OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.43; moderate-quality evidence), birthweight< 5<sup>th</sup> centile (2 studies; n=1163; OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19-0.50; low-quality evidence) and increases gestational age at delivery {four studies; n= 1362; MD 2.93 weeks, 95% CI 2.08-3.77; moderate-quality evidence}. The risk for stillbirth (2 studies; n= 1311; OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.43-6.21; very low-quality evidence) or pregnancy loss< 24 weeks (3 studies; n=1436; OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.55-2.58; very low-quality evidence) were not statistically significant different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to ongoing dichorionic twin pregnancies, dichorionic pregnancies that undergo elective selective fetal reduction are associated with lower incidences of preterm birth < 37 weeks, <34 weeks, <32 weeks, birthweight <10<sup>th</sup> centile and <5<sup>th</sup> centile, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and later gestational age at delivery by almost 3 weeks. These associations were often based on very low quality of evidence; so these results should be interpreted with caution and further studies should be conducted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101492\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估无并发症双胎妊娠中选择性减胎术对母胎结局的影响,并与持续性双胎妊娠进行比较:数据来源:PubMed、Scopus(截至 2023 年 12 月)和检索到的文章参考文献:采用 ROBINS-I 工具对观察性研究进行质量评估。证据的总体质量按照 GRADE 进行评估。对选择性减胎的二绒毛膜双胎进行了定量分析。主要结果是早产。次要结局是分娩时的胎龄、死产和新生儿重症监护室、妊娠糖尿病、先兆子痫和妊娠期<24周的妊娠损失。研究人员计算了汇总的几率比(ORs)及 95% 的置信区间(CIs),并使用随机效应模型进行数据综合:最初的电子检索产生了 745 项研究;从参考引文中进一步确定了 175 项研究。有 5 篇文章包含了适当的数据,最终被纳入荟萃分析。所有研究均被评估为 "中度偏倚风险"。这五篇研究报告的对象是二雌双胞胎。对二绒毛膜双胎进行选择性减胎术可降低早产th百分位数(2项研究;n=1163;OR 0.27,95% CI 0.17-0.43;中等质量证据)、出生体重<5百分位数(2项研究;n=1163;OR 0.31,95% CI 0.19-0.50;低质量证据)的风险,并增加分娩时的胎龄{4项研究;n=1362;MD 2.93周,95% CI 2.08-3.77;中等质量证据}。死胎(2 项研究;n= 1311;OR 1.63,95% CI 0.43-6.21;极低质量证据)或妊娠损失< 24 周(3 项研究;n= 1436;OR 1.20,95% CI 0.55-2.58;极低质量证据)的风险在统计学上没有显著差异:结论:与二绒毛膜双胎妊娠相比,接受选择性胎儿减胎术的二绒毛膜双胎妊娠的早产<37周、妊娠期糖尿病、妊娠期高血压疾病的发生率较低,胎龄推迟近3周。这些关联往往基于质量很低的证据;因此,在解释这些结果时应谨慎,并应开展进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selective Fetal Reduction of Uncomplicated Dichorionic Twins on Parental Request Versus Ongoing Twins and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of elective fetal reduction in uncomplicated twin pregnancies on maternal-fetal outcomes, compared to ongoing twin pregnancies.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus (until December 2023), and references of retrieved articles.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Quality assessment of observational studies was conducted using the ROBINS-I tool. The overall quality of evidence was evaluated per GRADE. A quantitative analysis was performed for electively reduced dichorionic twins. Primary outcome was preterm birth. Secondary outcomes were gestational age at delivery, stillbirth and neonatal intensive care unit, gestational diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, and pregnancy loss < 24 weeks of gestation. Summary odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects models were used for data synthesis.

Results: The initial electronic search yielded 745 studies; 175 studies were further identified from reference citations. Five articles included appropriate data and were finally included in the meta-analysis. All studies were evaluated as "moderate risk of bias". Those five studies reported on dichorionic twins. Elective reduction in dichorionic twins reduces the risk for preterm birth <37 weeks (4 studies; n=1577; OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.09-0.22, moderate-quality evidence), <34 weeks (3 studies; n=1335; OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.69; low-quality evidence), <32 weeks (3 studies; n=1335; OR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.11-0.88; low-quality evidence), gestational diabetes (3 studies; n= 1410; OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.97, low-quality evidence), pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders (2 studies; n=581; OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10-0.83; low-quality evidence), birthweight <10th centile (2 studies; n=1163; OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.43; moderate-quality evidence), birthweight< 5th centile (2 studies; n=1163; OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.19-0.50; low-quality evidence) and increases gestational age at delivery {four studies; n= 1362; MD 2.93 weeks, 95% CI 2.08-3.77; moderate-quality evidence}. The risk for stillbirth (2 studies; n= 1311; OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.43-6.21; very low-quality evidence) or pregnancy loss< 24 weeks (3 studies; n=1436; OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.55-2.58; very low-quality evidence) were not statistically significant different.

Conclusions: Compared to ongoing dichorionic twin pregnancies, dichorionic pregnancies that undergo elective selective fetal reduction are associated with lower incidences of preterm birth < 37 weeks, <34 weeks, <32 weeks, birthweight <10th centile and <5th centile, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and later gestational age at delivery by almost 3 weeks. These associations were often based on very low quality of evidence; so these results should be interpreted with caution and further studies should be conducted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信