调查老年人认知障碍的声学和心理语言学预测因素:模型研究。

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.2196/54655
Varsha D Badal, Jenna M Reinen, Elizabeth W Twamley, Ellen E Lee, Robert P Fellows, Erhan Bilal, Colin A Depp
{"title":"调查老年人认知障碍的声学和心理语言学预测因素:模型研究。","authors":"Varsha D Badal, Jenna M Reinen, Elizabeth W Twamley, Ellen E Lee, Robert P Fellows, Erhan Bilal, Colin A Depp","doi":"10.2196/54655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About one-third of older adults aged 65 years and older often have mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Acoustic and psycho-linguistic features derived from conversation may be of great diagnostic value because speech involves verbal memory and cognitive and neuromuscular processes. The relative decline in these processes, however, may not be linear and remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to establish associations between cognitive abilities and various attributes of speech and natural language production. To date, the majority of research has been cross-sectional, relying mostly on data from structured interactions and restricted to textual versus acoustic analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a sample of 71 older (mean age 83.3, SD 7.0 years) community-dwelling adults who completed qualitative interviews and cognitive testing, we investigated the performance of both acoustic and psycholinguistic features associated with cognitive deficits contemporaneously and at a 1-2 years follow up (mean follow-up time 512.3, SD 84.5 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combined acoustic and psycholinguistic features achieved high performance (F<sub>1</sub>-scores 0.73-0.86) and sensitivity (up to 0.90) in estimating cognitive deficits across multiple domains. Performance remained high when acoustic and psycholinguistic features were used to predict follow-up cognitive performance. The psycholinguistic features that were most successful at classifying high cognitive impairment reflected vocabulary richness, the quantity of speech produced, and the fragmentation of speech, whereas the analogous top-ranked acoustic features reflected breathing and nonverbal vocalizations such as giggles or laughter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that both acoustic and psycholinguistic features extracted from qualitative interviews may be reliable markers of cognitive deficits in late life.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e54655"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Acoustic and Psycholinguistic Predictors of Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Modeling Study.\",\"authors\":\"Varsha D Badal, Jenna M Reinen, Elizabeth W Twamley, Ellen E Lee, Robert P Fellows, Erhan Bilal, Colin A Depp\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/54655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About one-third of older adults aged 65 years and older often have mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Acoustic and psycho-linguistic features derived from conversation may be of great diagnostic value because speech involves verbal memory and cognitive and neuromuscular processes. The relative decline in these processes, however, may not be linear and remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to establish associations between cognitive abilities and various attributes of speech and natural language production. To date, the majority of research has been cross-sectional, relying mostly on data from structured interactions and restricted to textual versus acoustic analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a sample of 71 older (mean age 83.3, SD 7.0 years) community-dwelling adults who completed qualitative interviews and cognitive testing, we investigated the performance of both acoustic and psycholinguistic features associated with cognitive deficits contemporaneously and at a 1-2 years follow up (mean follow-up time 512.3, SD 84.5 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combined acoustic and psycholinguistic features achieved high performance (F<sub>1</sub>-scores 0.73-0.86) and sensitivity (up to 0.90) in estimating cognitive deficits across multiple domains. Performance remained high when acoustic and psycholinguistic features were used to predict follow-up cognitive performance. The psycholinguistic features that were most successful at classifying high cognitive impairment reflected vocabulary richness, the quantity of speech produced, and the fragmentation of speech, whereas the analogous top-ranked acoustic features reflected breathing and nonverbal vocalizations such as giggles or laughter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that both acoustic and psycholinguistic features extracted from qualitative interviews may be reliable markers of cognitive deficits in late life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Aging\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"e54655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443203/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/54655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 65 岁及以上的老年人中,约有三分之一通常患有轻度认知障碍或痴呆症。由于言语涉及言语记忆、认知和神经肌肉过程,因此从谈话中得出的声音和语言心理特征可能具有很高的诊断价值。然而,这些过程的相对衰退可能不是线性的,而且仍未得到充分研究:本研究旨在建立认知能力与语音和自然语言生成的各种属性之间的联系。迄今为止,大多数研究都是横断面研究,主要依赖于结构化互动的数据,而且仅限于文本分析和声音分析:方法:我们以 71 位完成定性访谈和认知测试的社区老年人(平均年龄 83.3 岁,标差 7.0 岁)为样本,调查了与认知缺陷相关的声学和心理语言特征在当时和 1-2 年随访期间(平均随访时间 512.3 天,标差 84.5 天)的表现:声学和心理语言学特征的组合在估计多个领域的认知缺陷方面具有较高的性能(F1-分数为0.73-0.86)和灵敏度(高达0.90)。当声学和心理语言学特征被用于预测后续认知表现时,其性能仍然很高。心理语言学特征能最成功地将认知障碍程度较高的人分类,这些特征反映了词汇的丰富程度、说话的数量和说话的片段,而排名靠前的类似声学特征则反映了呼吸和非语言发声,如咯咯笑或大笑:这些结果表明,从定性访谈中提取的声学和心理语言学特征可能是晚年认知障碍的可靠标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Acoustic and Psycholinguistic Predictors of Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: Modeling Study.

Background: About one-third of older adults aged 65 years and older often have mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Acoustic and psycho-linguistic features derived from conversation may be of great diagnostic value because speech involves verbal memory and cognitive and neuromuscular processes. The relative decline in these processes, however, may not be linear and remains understudied.

Objective: This study aims to establish associations between cognitive abilities and various attributes of speech and natural language production. To date, the majority of research has been cross-sectional, relying mostly on data from structured interactions and restricted to textual versus acoustic analyses.

Methods: In a sample of 71 older (mean age 83.3, SD 7.0 years) community-dwelling adults who completed qualitative interviews and cognitive testing, we investigated the performance of both acoustic and psycholinguistic features associated with cognitive deficits contemporaneously and at a 1-2 years follow up (mean follow-up time 512.3, SD 84.5 days).

Results: Combined acoustic and psycholinguistic features achieved high performance (F1-scores 0.73-0.86) and sensitivity (up to 0.90) in estimating cognitive deficits across multiple domains. Performance remained high when acoustic and psycholinguistic features were used to predict follow-up cognitive performance. The psycholinguistic features that were most successful at classifying high cognitive impairment reflected vocabulary richness, the quantity of speech produced, and the fragmentation of speech, whereas the analogous top-ranked acoustic features reflected breathing and nonverbal vocalizations such as giggles or laughter.

Conclusions: These results suggest that both acoustic and psycholinguistic features extracted from qualitative interviews may be reliable markers of cognitive deficits in late life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信