困难对话:针对社会工作、运动训练和医生助理课程的跨专业协作模拟。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Hailee Lauritzen, Eric G Post, Chelsea Elwood
{"title":"困难对话:针对社会工作、运动训练和医生助理课程的跨专业协作模拟。","authors":"Hailee Lauritzen, Eric G Post, Chelsea Elwood","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Students graduating from professional healthcare programs are expected to demonstrate competence in their area of study to enter the workforce and immediately start working with people. High expectations and a fast-paced environment are typical aspects of these professional positions and often result in higher rates of burnout, compassion fatigue, and lack of empathy, leading to an overall decrease in patient satisfaction. As a result, patients who face difficult situations may often feel as though their needs are not being addressed. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a shared educational module and simulated patient encounters on improving student confidence and competence engaging in difficult conversations with patients regarding intimate partner violence, substance abuse, and suicidal ideation. Students in the social work (n=14), athletic training (n=7), and physician assistant degree programs (n=20) participated in a collective learning module focusing on patient-centered care (PCC) skills required for having difficult conversations with patients. After students completed the shared learning module and prior to the simulated experience, students were given the Inter-professional Teams in Difficult Conversations Self-Assessment survey, a self-assessment tool measuring level of competence in engaging in difficult conversations. Students were then assigned to one of three rooms at random and varied in topic from intimate partner violence, substance abuse, or suicidal ideation. After the simulation, students completed the Inter-professional Teams in Difficult Conversations Self-Assessment survey again. Standardized patients (SP) also completed the Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ) immediately after the simulated experience. As hypothesized, students self-reported very high confidence in their ability to engage in difficult conversations using PCC, but SPs reported feeling little empathy or understanding of their situation from the students. Findings from this research demonstrate the disconnect in transfer of knowledge from understanding what PCC skills are to implementing them during difficult conversations.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 3","pages":"175-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difficult Conversations: A Collaborative Interprofessional Simulation for Social Work, Athletic Training and Physician Assistant Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Hailee Lauritzen, Eric G Post, Chelsea Elwood\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Students graduating from professional healthcare programs are expected to demonstrate competence in their area of study to enter the workforce and immediately start working with people. High expectations and a fast-paced environment are typical aspects of these professional positions and often result in higher rates of burnout, compassion fatigue, and lack of empathy, leading to an overall decrease in patient satisfaction. As a result, patients who face difficult situations may often feel as though their needs are not being addressed. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a shared educational module and simulated patient encounters on improving student confidence and competence engaging in difficult conversations with patients regarding intimate partner violence, substance abuse, and suicidal ideation. Students in the social work (n=14), athletic training (n=7), and physician assistant degree programs (n=20) participated in a collective learning module focusing on patient-centered care (PCC) skills required for having difficult conversations with patients. After students completed the shared learning module and prior to the simulated experience, students were given the Inter-professional Teams in Difficult Conversations Self-Assessment survey, a self-assessment tool measuring level of competence in engaging in difficult conversations. Students were then assigned to one of three rooms at random and varied in topic from intimate partner violence, substance abuse, or suicidal ideation. After the simulation, students completed the Inter-professional Teams in Difficult Conversations Self-Assessment survey again. Standardized patients (SP) also completed the Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ) immediately after the simulated experience. As hypothesized, students self-reported very high confidence in their ability to engage in difficult conversations using PCC, but SPs reported feeling little empathy or understanding of their situation from the students. Findings from this research demonstrate the disconnect in transfer of knowledge from understanding what PCC skills are to implementing them during difficult conversations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"53 3\",\"pages\":\"175-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从专业医疗保健课程毕业的学生在进入职场后,需要证明自己在所学领域的能力,并立即开始与人打交道。高期望值和快节奏的环境是这些专业岗位的典型特征,往往会导致职业倦怠、同情疲劳和缺乏同理心的比例上升,从而导致患者满意度整体下降。因此,面临困境的病人往往会觉得自己的需求没有得到满足。本研究的目的是检验共享教育模块和模拟患者接触对提高学生与患者就亲密伴侣暴力、药物滥用和自杀意念进行困难对话的信心和能力的有效性。社会工作专业(14 人)、运动训练专业(7 人)和助理医师专业(20 人)的学生参加了一个集体学习模块,该模块侧重于与患者进行困难对话时所需的 "以患者为中心的护理"(PCC)技能。学生完成共同学习模块后,在进行模拟体验之前,学生们接受了 "困难对话中跨专业团队自我评估调查",这是一种自我评估工具,用于衡量参与困难对话的能力水平。然后,学生们被随机分配到三个房间中的一个,主题分别为亲密伴侣暴力、药物滥用或自杀意念。模拟活动结束后,学生们再次完成了 "跨专业团队在困难对话中的自我评估 "调查。模拟体验结束后,标准化病人(SP)也立即填写了 "病人与专业人员互动问卷"(Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire,PPIQ)。正如假设的那样,学生们自我报告说,他们对自己使用 PCC 进行困难对话的能力非常有信心,但 SP 报告说,他们很少从学生那里感受到共鸣或对他们处境的理解。这项研究的结果表明,从了解 PCC 技能到在困难对话中实施这些技能,知识的传递是脱节的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Difficult Conversations: A Collaborative Interprofessional Simulation for Social Work, Athletic Training and Physician Assistant Programs.

Students graduating from professional healthcare programs are expected to demonstrate competence in their area of study to enter the workforce and immediately start working with people. High expectations and a fast-paced environment are typical aspects of these professional positions and often result in higher rates of burnout, compassion fatigue, and lack of empathy, leading to an overall decrease in patient satisfaction. As a result, patients who face difficult situations may often feel as though their needs are not being addressed. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a shared educational module and simulated patient encounters on improving student confidence and competence engaging in difficult conversations with patients regarding intimate partner violence, substance abuse, and suicidal ideation. Students in the social work (n=14), athletic training (n=7), and physician assistant degree programs (n=20) participated in a collective learning module focusing on patient-centered care (PCC) skills required for having difficult conversations with patients. After students completed the shared learning module and prior to the simulated experience, students were given the Inter-professional Teams in Difficult Conversations Self-Assessment survey, a self-assessment tool measuring level of competence in engaging in difficult conversations. Students were then assigned to one of three rooms at random and varied in topic from intimate partner violence, substance abuse, or suicidal ideation. After the simulation, students completed the Inter-professional Teams in Difficult Conversations Self-Assessment survey again. Standardized patients (SP) also completed the Patient-Professional Interaction Questionnaire (PPIQ) immediately after the simulated experience. As hypothesized, students self-reported very high confidence in their ability to engage in difficult conversations using PCC, but SPs reported feeling little empathy or understanding of their situation from the students. Findings from this research demonstrate the disconnect in transfer of knowledge from understanding what PCC skills are to implementing them during difficult conversations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信