比较皮质类固醇注射和阻力运动对膝关节骨关节炎患者的影响:系统综述。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Mina Isaac, LeiLani Lee, Dalin Parker, Rebecca Pettross, Ronald de Vera Barredo, Edilberto A Raynes
{"title":"比较皮质类固醇注射和阻力运动对膝关节骨关节炎患者的影响:系统综述。","authors":"Mina Isaac, LeiLani Lee, Dalin Parker, Rebecca Pettross, Ronald de Vera Barredo, Edilberto A Raynes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate research on the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroids injections compared with resistance exercise on pain, stiffness, and function among patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PRISMA guidelines, the authors performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed and EBSCOhost published between January 2012 and October 2022. The authors used keywords to identify studies. After screening the abstracts, reviewers used two screening tools to evaluate for validity and strength of each RCT. Full text of selected articles was critically appraised and narrative analysis was performed. The outcome used to determine effectiveness of the interventions was the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 69,056 articles identified during the preliminary search, 8 met the inclusion criteria for use in the study. Three studies involved resistance exercise, and 5 studies involved corticosteroids. Of the 3 resistance studies, 2 had significant changes in WOMAC scores. Of the 5 studies on corticosteroid injections, 4 had significant changes in WOMAC scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence from this review suggests that there is a significant improvement in WOMAC scores for both intervention groups. Although an analysis of research evidence suggests that there is no superior treatment for knee osteoarthritis between corticosteroid injections and resistance exercise, it is important to consider contextual and environmental factors before recommending either treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 3","pages":"239-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Effects of Corticosteroid Injections and Resistance Exercise on Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mina Isaac, LeiLani Lee, Dalin Parker, Rebecca Pettross, Ronald de Vera Barredo, Edilberto A Raynes\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate research on the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroids injections compared with resistance exercise on pain, stiffness, and function among patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PRISMA guidelines, the authors performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed and EBSCOhost published between January 2012 and October 2022. The authors used keywords to identify studies. After screening the abstracts, reviewers used two screening tools to evaluate for validity and strength of each RCT. Full text of selected articles was critically appraised and narrative analysis was performed. The outcome used to determine effectiveness of the interventions was the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 69,056 articles identified during the preliminary search, 8 met the inclusion criteria for use in the study. Three studies involved resistance exercise, and 5 studies involved corticosteroids. Of the 3 resistance studies, 2 had significant changes in WOMAC scores. Of the 5 studies on corticosteroid injections, 4 had significant changes in WOMAC scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence from this review suggests that there is a significant improvement in WOMAC scores for both intervention groups. Although an analysis of research evidence suggests that there is no superior treatment for knee osteoarthritis between corticosteroid injections and resistance exercise, it is important to consider contextual and environmental factors before recommending either treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"53 3\",\"pages\":\"239-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估关节内皮质类固醇注射与阻力运动相比对膝关节骨性关节炎患者的疼痛、僵硬和功能的有效性:作者采用PRISMA指南,对2012年1月至2022年10月期间发表在PubMed和EBSCOhost上的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾。作者使用关键词来识别研究。筛选摘要后,审稿人使用两种筛选工具对每项随机对照试验的有效性和强度进行评估。对所选文章的全文进行了严格评估,并进行了叙述性分析。用于确定干预效果的结果是西安大略麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC):在初步搜索中发现的 69 056 篇文章中,有 8 篇符合研究的纳入标准。其中 3 项研究涉及抗阻力运动,5 项研究涉及皮质类固醇。在 3 项抗阻运动研究中,2 项研究的 WOMAC 评分有显著变化。在 5 项皮质类固醇注射研究中,4 项研究的 WOMAC 评分有显著变化:本综述的证据表明,两个干预组的 WOMAC 评分均有明显改善。尽管研究证据分析表明,注射皮质类固醇和阻力运动治疗膝关节骨性关节炎之间并无优劣之分,但在推荐任何一种治疗方法之前,考虑背景和环境因素非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Effects of Corticosteroid Injections and Resistance Exercise on Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: To evaluate research on the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroids injections compared with resistance exercise on pain, stiffness, and function among patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods: Using the PRISMA guidelines, the authors performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed and EBSCOhost published between January 2012 and October 2022. The authors used keywords to identify studies. After screening the abstracts, reviewers used two screening tools to evaluate for validity and strength of each RCT. Full text of selected articles was critically appraised and narrative analysis was performed. The outcome used to determine effectiveness of the interventions was the Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

Results: Of the 69,056 articles identified during the preliminary search, 8 met the inclusion criteria for use in the study. Three studies involved resistance exercise, and 5 studies involved corticosteroids. Of the 3 resistance studies, 2 had significant changes in WOMAC scores. Of the 5 studies on corticosteroid injections, 4 had significant changes in WOMAC scores.

Conclusion: Evidence from this review suggests that there is a significant improvement in WOMAC scores for both intervention groups. Although an analysis of research evidence suggests that there is no superior treatment for knee osteoarthritis between corticosteroid injections and resistance exercise, it is important to consider contextual and environmental factors before recommending either treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信