{"title":"评估英国医院全髋关节置换术的碳足迹和减排机会。","authors":"Preetham Kodumuri, Pushkar Joshi, Ibrahim Malek","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0027.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the carbon footprint associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a UK hospital setting, considering various components within the operating theatre. The primary objective was to identify actionable areas for reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable orthopaedic practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a life-cycle assessment approach, we conducted a prospective study on ten cemented and ten hybrid THA cases, evaluating carbon emissions from anaesthetic room to recovery. Scope 1 and scope 2 emissions were considered, focusing on direct emissions and energy consumption. Data included detailed assessments of consumables, waste generation, and energy use during surgeries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The carbon footprint of an uncemented THA was estimated at 100.02 kg CO2e, with a marginal increase to 104.89 kg CO2e for hybrid THA. Key contributors were consumables in the operating theatre (21%), waste generation (22%), and scope 2 emissions (38%). The study identified opportunities for reducing emissions, including instrument rationalization, transitioning to LED lighting, and improving waste-recycling practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study sheds light on the substantial carbon footprint associated with THA. Actionable strategies for reducing emissions were identified, emphasizing the need for sustainable practices in orthopaedic surgery. The findings prompt a critical discussion on the environmental impact of single-use versus reusable items in the operating theatre, challenging traditional norms to make more environmentally responsible choices.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 9","pages":"742-748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the carbon footprint of total hip arthroplasty and opportunities for emission reduction in a UK hospital setting.\",\"authors\":\"Preetham Kodumuri, Pushkar Joshi, Ibrahim Malek\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0027.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to assess the carbon footprint associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a UK hospital setting, considering various components within the operating theatre. The primary objective was to identify actionable areas for reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable orthopaedic practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a life-cycle assessment approach, we conducted a prospective study on ten cemented and ten hybrid THA cases, evaluating carbon emissions from anaesthetic room to recovery. Scope 1 and scope 2 emissions were considered, focusing on direct emissions and energy consumption. Data included detailed assessments of consumables, waste generation, and energy use during surgeries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The carbon footprint of an uncemented THA was estimated at 100.02 kg CO2e, with a marginal increase to 104.89 kg CO2e for hybrid THA. Key contributors were consumables in the operating theatre (21%), waste generation (22%), and scope 2 emissions (38%). The study identified opportunities for reducing emissions, including instrument rationalization, transitioning to LED lighting, and improving waste-recycling practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study sheds light on the substantial carbon footprint associated with THA. Actionable strategies for reducing emissions were identified, emphasizing the need for sustainable practices in orthopaedic surgery. The findings prompt a critical discussion on the environmental impact of single-use versus reusable items in the operating theatre, challenging traditional norms to make more environmentally responsible choices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"742-748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11383638/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0027.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0027.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估英国一家医院全髋关节置换术(THA)的碳足迹,同时考虑手术室内的各种组件。主要目的是确定减少碳排放和促进可持续骨科实践的可行领域:采用生命周期评估方法,我们对十例骨水泥和十例混合THA进行了前瞻性研究,评估了从麻醉室到恢复的碳排放量。研究考虑了范围 1 和范围 2 排放,重点关注直接排放和能源消耗。数据包括手术过程中消耗品、废物产生和能源使用的详细评估:结果:非骨水泥 THA 的碳足迹估计为 100.02 kg CO2e,混合 THA 的碳足迹略有增加,为 104.89 kg CO2e。造成碳足迹的主要因素是手术室的消耗品(21%)、废物产生(22%)和范围 2 排放(38%)。研究发现了减少排放的机会,包括器械合理化、过渡到 LED 照明以及改进废物回收做法:本研究揭示了与 THA 相关的大量碳足迹。结论:本研究揭示了与 THA 相关的大量碳足迹,确定了可行的减排策略,强调了骨科手术中可持续实践的必要性。研究结果促使人们对手术室中一次性物品和可重复使用物品对环境的影响进行批判性讨论,挑战传统规范,做出对环境更负责任的选择。
Assessment of the carbon footprint of total hip arthroplasty and opportunities for emission reduction in a UK hospital setting.
Aims: This study aimed to assess the carbon footprint associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a UK hospital setting, considering various components within the operating theatre. The primary objective was to identify actionable areas for reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable orthopaedic practices.
Methods: Using a life-cycle assessment approach, we conducted a prospective study on ten cemented and ten hybrid THA cases, evaluating carbon emissions from anaesthetic room to recovery. Scope 1 and scope 2 emissions were considered, focusing on direct emissions and energy consumption. Data included detailed assessments of consumables, waste generation, and energy use during surgeries.
Results: The carbon footprint of an uncemented THA was estimated at 100.02 kg CO2e, with a marginal increase to 104.89 kg CO2e for hybrid THA. Key contributors were consumables in the operating theatre (21%), waste generation (22%), and scope 2 emissions (38%). The study identified opportunities for reducing emissions, including instrument rationalization, transitioning to LED lighting, and improving waste-recycling practices.
Conclusion: This study sheds light on the substantial carbon footprint associated with THA. Actionable strategies for reducing emissions were identified, emphasizing the need for sustainable practices in orthopaedic surgery. The findings prompt a critical discussion on the environmental impact of single-use versus reusable items in the operating theatre, challenging traditional norms to make more environmentally responsible choices.