肾脏病学中的人工智能集成:评估 ChatGPT 在准确记录 ICD-10 和编码方面的作用。

IF 3 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2024.1457586
Yasir Abdelgadir, Charat Thongprayoon, Jing Miao, Supawadee Suppadungsuk, Justin H Pham, Michael A Mao, Iasmina M Craici, Wisit Cheungpasitporn
{"title":"肾脏病学中的人工智能集成:评估 ChatGPT 在准确记录 ICD-10 和编码方面的作用。","authors":"Yasir Abdelgadir, Charat Thongprayoon, Jing Miao, Supawadee Suppadungsuk, Justin H Pham, Michael A Mao, Iasmina M Craici, Wisit Cheungpasitporn","doi":"10.3389/frai.2024.1457586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate ICD-10 coding is crucial for healthcare reimbursement, patient care, and research. AI implementation, like ChatGPT, could improve coding accuracy and reduce physician burden. This study assessed ChatGPT's performance in identifying ICD-10 codes for nephrology conditions through case scenarios for pre-visit testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two nephrologists created 100 simulated nephrology cases. ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 were evaluated by comparing AI-generated ICD-10 codes against predetermined correct codes. Assessments were conducted in two rounds, 2 weeks apart, in April 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first round, the accuracy of ChatGPT for assigning correct diagnosis codes was 91 and 99% for version 3.5 and 4.0, respectively. In the second round, the accuracy of ChatGPT for assigning the correct diagnosis code was 87% for version 3.5 and 99% for version 4.0. ChatGPT 4.0 had higher accuracy than ChatGPT 3.5 (<i>p</i> = 0.02 and 0.002 for the first and second round respectively). The accuracy did not significantly differ between the two rounds (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT 4.0 can significantly improve ICD-10 coding accuracy in nephrology through case scenarios for pre-visit testing, potentially reducing healthcare professionals' workload. However, the small error percentage underscores the need for ongoing review and improvement of AI systems to ensure accurate reimbursement, optimal patient care, and reliable research data.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"7 ","pages":"1457586"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI integration in nephrology: evaluating ChatGPT for accurate ICD-10 documentation and coding.\",\"authors\":\"Yasir Abdelgadir, Charat Thongprayoon, Jing Miao, Supawadee Suppadungsuk, Justin H Pham, Michael A Mao, Iasmina M Craici, Wisit Cheungpasitporn\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frai.2024.1457586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate ICD-10 coding is crucial for healthcare reimbursement, patient care, and research. AI implementation, like ChatGPT, could improve coding accuracy and reduce physician burden. This study assessed ChatGPT's performance in identifying ICD-10 codes for nephrology conditions through case scenarios for pre-visit testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two nephrologists created 100 simulated nephrology cases. ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 were evaluated by comparing AI-generated ICD-10 codes against predetermined correct codes. Assessments were conducted in two rounds, 2 weeks apart, in April 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first round, the accuracy of ChatGPT for assigning correct diagnosis codes was 91 and 99% for version 3.5 and 4.0, respectively. In the second round, the accuracy of ChatGPT for assigning the correct diagnosis code was 87% for version 3.5 and 99% for version 4.0. ChatGPT 4.0 had higher accuracy than ChatGPT 3.5 (<i>p</i> = 0.02 and 0.002 for the first and second round respectively). The accuracy did not significantly differ between the two rounds (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT 4.0 can significantly improve ICD-10 coding accuracy in nephrology through case scenarios for pre-visit testing, potentially reducing healthcare professionals' workload. However, the small error percentage underscores the need for ongoing review and improvement of AI systems to ensure accurate reimbursement, optimal patient care, and reliable research data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1457586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402808/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1457586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1457586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确的 ICD-10 编码对医疗报销、患者护理和研究至关重要。人工智能的应用,如 ChatGPT,可以提高编码的准确性并减轻医生的负担。本研究通过就诊前测试的病例场景,评估了 ChatGPT 在识别肾脏病 ICD-10 编码方面的性能:方法:两名肾病专家创建了 100 个模拟肾病病例。通过比较人工智能生成的 ICD-10 代码与预先确定的正确代码,对 ChatGPT 3.5 和 4.0 版本进行了评估。评估在 2024 年 4 月分两轮进行,每轮相隔 2 周:在第一轮评估中,3.5 版和 4.0 版 ChatGPT 分配正确诊断代码的准确率分别为 91% 和 99%。在第二轮中,3.5 版和 4.0 版 ChatGPT 分配正确诊断代码的准确率分别为 87% 和 99%。ChatGPT 4.0 的准确率高于 ChatGPT 3.5(第一轮和第二轮分别为 p = 0.02 和 0.002)。两轮之间的准确率没有明显差异(p > 0.05):ChatGPT 4.0 可通过病例情景进行就诊前测试,显著提高肾内科 ICD-10 编码的准确性,从而减轻医护人员的工作量。然而,较小的错误率强调了对人工智能系统进行持续审查和改进的必要性,以确保准确的报销、最佳的患者护理和可靠的研究数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI integration in nephrology: evaluating ChatGPT for accurate ICD-10 documentation and coding.

Background: Accurate ICD-10 coding is crucial for healthcare reimbursement, patient care, and research. AI implementation, like ChatGPT, could improve coding accuracy and reduce physician burden. This study assessed ChatGPT's performance in identifying ICD-10 codes for nephrology conditions through case scenarios for pre-visit testing.

Methods: Two nephrologists created 100 simulated nephrology cases. ChatGPT versions 3.5 and 4.0 were evaluated by comparing AI-generated ICD-10 codes against predetermined correct codes. Assessments were conducted in two rounds, 2 weeks apart, in April 2024.

Results: In the first round, the accuracy of ChatGPT for assigning correct diagnosis codes was 91 and 99% for version 3.5 and 4.0, respectively. In the second round, the accuracy of ChatGPT for assigning the correct diagnosis code was 87% for version 3.5 and 99% for version 4.0. ChatGPT 4.0 had higher accuracy than ChatGPT 3.5 (p = 0.02 and 0.002 for the first and second round respectively). The accuracy did not significantly differ between the two rounds (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: ChatGPT 4.0 can significantly improve ICD-10 coding accuracy in nephrology through case scenarios for pre-visit testing, potentially reducing healthcare professionals' workload. However, the small error percentage underscores the need for ongoing review and improvement of AI systems to ensure accurate reimbursement, optimal patient care, and reliable research data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信