Metagenomic analysis of rats with diarrhea treated with mixed probiotics: response to consecutive and alternate-hour supplementation.

Background: Diarrhea is the leading contributory factor of sickness and mortality among children under five and an economic burden for families. This study aimed to investigate the effects of mixed probiotics supplementation at different times (consecutive and alternate-hour) on intestinal microecology in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with acute diarrhea.

Methods: A total of 40 SD rats were randomly assigned to four groups, including the control group, model group, probiotic group A, and probiotic group B. An acute diarrhea model was induced by administration of 5% dextran sulfate sodium. Rats in probiotic group A and probiotic group B were fed with Clostridium butyricum (C. butyricum), Bifidobacterium infantis (B. infantis), and Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii) for a total of 7 days. Probiotic group A was fed with all probiotics simultaneously. Probiotic group B was fed with C. butyricum and B. infantis simultaneously, and then after a 2-hour interval, with S. boulardii. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing was used to analyze the fecal samples from every rat. The metagenomic sequencing used in this experiment was used to evaluate the effect of probiotics on the composition as well as function of the gut microbiota in order to gain a deeper comprehension of probiotic-host interactions on health and disease.

Results: The structure of the gut microbiota in probiotic group A showed significant changes. Compared to the model group, the abundance of some beneficial bacteria had increased, including Actinobacteria (P=0.048), Lactobacillus (P=0.050), and Lactobacillus johnsonii (P=0.042), and many opportunistic pathogenic bacteria has decreased, such as Ruminococcus (P=0.001). Compared to the control group, the abundance of some beneficial bacteria had increased, including Fusobacteria (P=0.02) and Phascolarium (P=0.002), and there was a reduction in the abundance of many opportunistic pathogenic bacteria such as Roseburia (P=0.03), Lachnoclosterium (P=0.009), and Oscillibacter_sp_1-3 (P=0.002). In addition, metagenomic analysis showed that as well as an up-regulation of glycoside hydrolase expression, amino acid and inorganic ion transport, and metabolism-related pathways, there was a down-regulation of cell motility.

Conclusions: Simultaneous administration of probiotics may have more positive implications in improving the gut microbiota of acute diarrhea rats.