循环死亡后捐献肝脏恢复团队的来源与移植物存活率之间的关系:一项全国性研究。

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001699
Tobenna Ibeabuchi, Eric Li, Claire Cywes, Therese Bittermann, Nadim Mahmud, Peter L Abt
{"title":"循环死亡后捐献肝脏恢复团队的来源与移植物存活率之间的关系:一项全国性研究。","authors":"Tobenna Ibeabuchi, Eric Li, Claire Cywes, Therese Bittermann, Nadim Mahmud, Peter L Abt","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transplant centers have traditionally relied upon procurement teams from their own programs (transplant program procurement team [TPT]) to recover donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers and rarely use surgical procurement teams not affiliated with the recipient center (nontransplant program procurement team [NTPT]). However, in the era of wider geographic organ sharing, greater reliance on NTPTs is often necessary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used national data to study the association between the origin of the donor procurement team (NTPT versus TPT) and the risk of DCD liver allograft failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred NTPT and 2257 TPT DCD transplants were identified: 1-y graft survival was 88.9 and 88.6%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.962). In a multivariable model, the origin of the procurement team was not associated with graft failure NTPT versus TPT (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.22; <i>P</i> = 0.57) but rather with known risks for DCD graft loss including donor age, degree of recipient illness, cold ischemic time, and retransplantation. The overall incidence of retransplantation and ischemic cholangiopathy as an indication for retransplantation were similar between NTPT and TPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This data suggests that transplant centers may be able to safely use DCD livers recovered by local surgical teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"10 10","pages":"e1699"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between the Origin of the Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Recovery Team and Graft Survival: A National Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tobenna Ibeabuchi, Eric Li, Claire Cywes, Therese Bittermann, Nadim Mahmud, Peter L Abt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transplant centers have traditionally relied upon procurement teams from their own programs (transplant program procurement team [TPT]) to recover donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers and rarely use surgical procurement teams not affiliated with the recipient center (nontransplant program procurement team [NTPT]). However, in the era of wider geographic organ sharing, greater reliance on NTPTs is often necessary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used national data to study the association between the origin of the donor procurement team (NTPT versus TPT) and the risk of DCD liver allograft failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred NTPT and 2257 TPT DCD transplants were identified: 1-y graft survival was 88.9 and 88.6%, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.962). In a multivariable model, the origin of the procurement team was not associated with graft failure NTPT versus TPT (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.22; <i>P</i> = 0.57) but rather with known risks for DCD graft loss including donor age, degree of recipient illness, cold ischemic time, and retransplantation. The overall incidence of retransplantation and ischemic cholangiopathy as an indication for retransplantation were similar between NTPT and TPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This data suggests that transplant centers may be able to safely use DCD livers recovered by local surgical teams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"volume\":\"10 10\",\"pages\":\"e1699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410324/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation Direct\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统上,移植中心依靠自己项目的采购团队(移植项目采购团队[TPT])回收循环死亡(DCD)后捐献的肝脏,很少使用与受体中心无关的外科采购团队(非移植项目采购团队[NTPT])。然而,在更广泛的地域器官共享时代,更多地依赖 NTPT 往往是必要的:我们利用全国数据研究了捐献者采购团队的来源(NTPT与TPT)与DCD肝脏异体移植失败风险之间的关系:结果:确定了500例NTPT和2257例TPT DCD移植:1年移植存活率分别为88.9%和88.6%(P = 0.962)。在多变量模型中,采购团队的来源与 NTPT 和 TPT 移植失败无关(危险比为 0.92;95% 置信区间为 0.71-1.22;P = 0.57),而是与已知的 DCD 移植损失风险有关,包括供体年龄、受体疾病程度、低温缺血时间和再移植。NTPT和TPT的再移植总发生率和作为再移植指征的缺血性胆管病相似:这些数据表明,移植中心可以安全地使用当地外科团队回收的 DCD 肝脏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association Between the Origin of the Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Recovery Team and Graft Survival: A National Study.

Background: Transplant centers have traditionally relied upon procurement teams from their own programs (transplant program procurement team [TPT]) to recover donation after circulatory death (DCD) livers and rarely use surgical procurement teams not affiliated with the recipient center (nontransplant program procurement team [NTPT]). However, in the era of wider geographic organ sharing, greater reliance on NTPTs is often necessary.

Methods: We used national data to study the association between the origin of the donor procurement team (NTPT versus TPT) and the risk of DCD liver allograft failure.

Results: Five hundred NTPT and 2257 TPT DCD transplants were identified: 1-y graft survival was 88.9 and 88.6%, respectively (P = 0.962). In a multivariable model, the origin of the procurement team was not associated with graft failure NTPT versus TPT (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.22; P = 0.57) but rather with known risks for DCD graft loss including donor age, degree of recipient illness, cold ischemic time, and retransplantation. The overall incidence of retransplantation and ischemic cholangiopathy as an indication for retransplantation were similar between NTPT and TPT.

Conclusions: This data suggests that transplant centers may be able to safely use DCD livers recovered by local surgical teams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信