乳腺磁共振成像在评估三阴性乳腺癌和小于 3 厘米的纤维腺瘤中的潜在作用。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.21037/tcr-24-498
Zifan Wei, Xue Chen, Yiwen Yang, Ling Yang, Xinxing Ma
{"title":"乳腺磁共振成像在评估三阴性乳腺癌和小于 3 厘米的纤维腺瘤中的潜在作用。","authors":"Zifan Wei, Xue Chen, Yiwen Yang, Ling Yang, Xinxing Ma","doi":"10.21037/tcr-24-498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of small-sized (<3 cm) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibit smooth margins upon palpation and are often oval or rounded masses. Distinguishing these masses preoperatively from fibroadenomas (FAs) would be very meaningful for clinical practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of TNBC and differentiate it from FAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, we included 37 patients with TNBCs and 36 patients with FAs who underwent breast MRI. We employed the χ<sup>2</sup> test and <i>t-</i>test to compare the differences in morphological features, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between the two groups. Additionally, we constructed non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using ADC values, with pathological results serving as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 TNBC lesions and 39 FA lesions were included in the final analysis. TNBCs exhibited more frequent irregular shape, irregular margins, peritumoral edema, fast enhancement in the initial phase, rim enhancement, and time-signal intensity curve (TIC) type III compared to FAs (all P<0.05). Conversely, low-signal segregation in T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and TIC type I were commonly found in FAs. The mean ADC value of TNBCs was significantly lower than that of FAs [(1.104±0.13)×10<sup>-3</sup> <i>vs</i>. (1.613±0.16)×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, P<0.05]. The cutoff ADC for differentiating TNBCs from FAs was 1.239×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.997, a sensitivity of 94.6%, and a specificity of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The morphological presentation of MRI, internal enhancement features of the mass, TIC curves, and ADC values provide valuable differential diagnostic information for TNBC and FA masses with a maximum diameter of less than 3 cm.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potential role of breast MRI in evaluation of triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma of less than 3 cm.\",\"authors\":\"Zifan Wei, Xue Chen, Yiwen Yang, Ling Yang, Xinxing Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tcr-24-498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of small-sized (<3 cm) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibit smooth margins upon palpation and are often oval or rounded masses. Distinguishing these masses preoperatively from fibroadenomas (FAs) would be very meaningful for clinical practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of TNBC and differentiate it from FAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, we included 37 patients with TNBCs and 36 patients with FAs who underwent breast MRI. We employed the χ<sup>2</sup> test and <i>t-</i>test to compare the differences in morphological features, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between the two groups. Additionally, we constructed non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using ADC values, with pathological results serving as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 TNBC lesions and 39 FA lesions were included in the final analysis. TNBCs exhibited more frequent irregular shape, irregular margins, peritumoral edema, fast enhancement in the initial phase, rim enhancement, and time-signal intensity curve (TIC) type III compared to FAs (all P<0.05). Conversely, low-signal segregation in T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and TIC type I were commonly found in FAs. The mean ADC value of TNBCs was significantly lower than that of FAs [(1.104±0.13)×10<sup>-3</sup> <i>vs</i>. (1.613±0.16)×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, P<0.05]. The cutoff ADC for differentiating TNBCs from FAs was 1.239×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.997, a sensitivity of 94.6%, and a specificity of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The morphological presentation of MRI, internal enhancement features of the mass, TIC curves, and ADC values provide valuable differential diagnostic information for TNBC and FA masses with a maximum diameter of less than 3 cm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational cancer research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384317/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-498\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数小型乳腺癌(MRI)都是由乳腺纤维瘤(TNBC)和乳腺癌(FAs)引起的:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们纳入了接受乳腺 MRI 检查的 37 例 TNBC 患者和 36 例 FA 患者。我们采用χ2检验和t检验比较了两组患者在形态学特征、动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)参数和表观弥散系数(ADC)值方面的差异。此外,我们还利用ADC值构建了非参数接收器操作特征曲线(ROC),并将病理结果作为金标准:结果:共有 37 个 TNBC 病变和 39 个 FA 病变被纳入最终分析。与FA相比,TNBC病灶表现出更多的不规则形状、不规则边缘、瘤周水肿、初期快速强化、边缘强化和时间信号强度曲线(TIC)Ⅲ型(均为P-3 vs. (1.613±0.16)×10-3 mm2/s,P-3 mm2/s,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.997,敏感性为94.6%,特异性为100%):MRI的形态学表现、肿块的内部增强特征、TIC曲线和ADC值为最大直径小于3厘米的TNBC和FA肿块提供了有价值的鉴别诊断信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The potential role of breast MRI in evaluation of triple-negative breast cancer and fibroadenoma of less than 3 cm.

Background: The majority of small-sized (<3 cm) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) exhibit smooth margins upon palpation and are often oval or rounded masses. Distinguishing these masses preoperatively from fibroadenomas (FAs) would be very meaningful for clinical practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of TNBC and differentiate it from FAs.

Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we included 37 patients with TNBCs and 36 patients with FAs who underwent breast MRI. We employed the χ2 test and t-test to compare the differences in morphological features, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between the two groups. Additionally, we constructed non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves using ADC values, with pathological results serving as the gold standard.

Results: A total of 37 TNBC lesions and 39 FA lesions were included in the final analysis. TNBCs exhibited more frequent irregular shape, irregular margins, peritumoral edema, fast enhancement in the initial phase, rim enhancement, and time-signal intensity curve (TIC) type III compared to FAs (all P<0.05). Conversely, low-signal segregation in T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and TIC type I were commonly found in FAs. The mean ADC value of TNBCs was significantly lower than that of FAs [(1.104±0.13)×10-3 vs. (1.613±0.16)×10-3 mm2/s, P<0.05]. The cutoff ADC for differentiating TNBCs from FAs was 1.239×10-3 mm2/s, yielding an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.997, a sensitivity of 94.6%, and a specificity of 100%.

Conclusions: The morphological presentation of MRI, internal enhancement features of the mass, TIC curves, and ADC values provide valuable differential diagnostic information for TNBC and FA masses with a maximum diameter of less than 3 cm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信