利用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库分析预测分化型甲状腺癌的理想截止年龄。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.21037/tcr-24-247
Hui Peng, Minglin Zheng, Jing-Ying Li, Zhaohui Jin
{"title":"利用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库分析预测分化型甲状腺癌的理想截止年龄。","authors":"Hui Peng, Minglin Zheng, Jing-Ying Li, Zhaohui Jin","doi":"10.21037/tcr-24-247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been discovered that the prognosis of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) correlates with age at initial diagnosis. However, there are disagreements over the optimal cutoff age among the numerous staging and risk stratification criteria, which make it inconsistent to predict the clinical prognosis of specific DTC patients. This study aimed to determine the optimum cutoff age for diagnosis in relation to the clinical outcomes of DTC using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The best age cutoff value was determined by the X-tile software. The link between clinical characteristics and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was examined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. An additional application of the independent prognostic criteria, such as age stratifications, was applied to construct a nomogram model for predicting the chances of patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most accurate diagnosis cutoff age for DTC patients was suggested to be 67 years old. The multivariate analysis, using factors determined by univariate analysis, showed that age [>67 years, hazard rate (HR) =5.049, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.509-5.653, P<0.001], sex (female, HR =0.651, 95% CI: 0.584-0.727, P<0.001), tumor size (>20 and ≤40 mm, HR =2.296, 95% CI: 1.983-2.658, P<0.001; >40 mm, HR =4.976, 95% CI: 4.304-5.752, P<0.001), lymphadenectomy (HR =1.337, 95% CI: 1.186-1.506, P<0.001), distant metastasis (HR =12.166, 95% CI: 10.749-13.769, P<0.001) and surgical treatment (HR =0.173, 95% CI: 0.144-0.210, P<0.001) were independent factors for CSS. Patients in the high-risk group had worse survival rates, and the C-index for the CSS prediction model with age (cutoff of 67) and other independent clinicopathological variables was 0.906.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accordingly, the optimal cutoff age for predicting death from DTC specifically is 67 years old at the time of the initial diagnosis. It might be a more suitable factor when used in risk stratification for patients with DTC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the ideal cutoff age as a predictor of differentiated thyroid cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.\",\"authors\":\"Hui Peng, Minglin Zheng, Jing-Ying Li, Zhaohui Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tcr-24-247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has been discovered that the prognosis of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) correlates with age at initial diagnosis. However, there are disagreements over the optimal cutoff age among the numerous staging and risk stratification criteria, which make it inconsistent to predict the clinical prognosis of specific DTC patients. This study aimed to determine the optimum cutoff age for diagnosis in relation to the clinical outcomes of DTC using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The best age cutoff value was determined by the X-tile software. The link between clinical characteristics and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was examined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. An additional application of the independent prognostic criteria, such as age stratifications, was applied to construct a nomogram model for predicting the chances of patient survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most accurate diagnosis cutoff age for DTC patients was suggested to be 67 years old. The multivariate analysis, using factors determined by univariate analysis, showed that age [>67 years, hazard rate (HR) =5.049, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.509-5.653, P<0.001], sex (female, HR =0.651, 95% CI: 0.584-0.727, P<0.001), tumor size (>20 and ≤40 mm, HR =2.296, 95% CI: 1.983-2.658, P<0.001; >40 mm, HR =4.976, 95% CI: 4.304-5.752, P<0.001), lymphadenectomy (HR =1.337, 95% CI: 1.186-1.506, P<0.001), distant metastasis (HR =12.166, 95% CI: 10.749-13.769, P<0.001) and surgical treatment (HR =0.173, 95% CI: 0.144-0.210, P<0.001) were independent factors for CSS. Patients in the high-risk group had worse survival rates, and the C-index for the CSS prediction model with age (cutoff of 67) and other independent clinicopathological variables was 0.906.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accordingly, the optimal cutoff age for predicting death from DTC specifically is 67 years old at the time of the initial diagnosis. It might be a more suitable factor when used in risk stratification for patients with DTC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational cancer research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384314/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-247\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究发现,分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者的预后与初次诊断时的年龄有关。然而,在众多分期和风险分层标准中,对于最佳分界年龄存在分歧,因此无法预测特定 DTC 患者的临床预后。本研究旨在利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的数据,确定与 DTC 临床预后相关的最佳诊断截断年龄:方法:X-tile软件确定了最佳年龄截断值。采用单变量和多变量考克斯回归模型研究了临床特征与癌症特异性生存率(CSS)之间的联系。另外还应用了年龄分层等独立预后标准,构建了一个预测患者生存机会的提名图模型:结果:DTC 患者最准确的诊断截断年龄为 67 岁。利用单变量分析确定的因素进行的多变量分析表明,年龄[>67 岁,危险率(HR)=5.049,95% 置信区间(CI):4.509-5.653,P20 和 ≤40 mm,HR=2.296,95% CI:1.983-2.658,P40 mm,HR=4.976,95% CI:4.304-5.752,PC结论:因此,预测 DTC 死亡的最佳临界年龄是初次诊断时的 67 岁。在对 DTC 患者进行风险分层时,这可能是一个更合适的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the ideal cutoff age as a predictor of differentiated thyroid cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Background: It has been discovered that the prognosis of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) correlates with age at initial diagnosis. However, there are disagreements over the optimal cutoff age among the numerous staging and risk stratification criteria, which make it inconsistent to predict the clinical prognosis of specific DTC patients. This study aimed to determine the optimum cutoff age for diagnosis in relation to the clinical outcomes of DTC using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods: The best age cutoff value was determined by the X-tile software. The link between clinical characteristics and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was examined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. An additional application of the independent prognostic criteria, such as age stratifications, was applied to construct a nomogram model for predicting the chances of patient survival.

Results: The most accurate diagnosis cutoff age for DTC patients was suggested to be 67 years old. The multivariate analysis, using factors determined by univariate analysis, showed that age [>67 years, hazard rate (HR) =5.049, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.509-5.653, P<0.001], sex (female, HR =0.651, 95% CI: 0.584-0.727, P<0.001), tumor size (>20 and ≤40 mm, HR =2.296, 95% CI: 1.983-2.658, P<0.001; >40 mm, HR =4.976, 95% CI: 4.304-5.752, P<0.001), lymphadenectomy (HR =1.337, 95% CI: 1.186-1.506, P<0.001), distant metastasis (HR =12.166, 95% CI: 10.749-13.769, P<0.001) and surgical treatment (HR =0.173, 95% CI: 0.144-0.210, P<0.001) were independent factors for CSS. Patients in the high-risk group had worse survival rates, and the C-index for the CSS prediction model with age (cutoff of 67) and other independent clinicopathological variables was 0.906.

Conclusions: Accordingly, the optimal cutoff age for predicting death from DTC specifically is 67 years old at the time of the initial diagnosis. It might be a more suitable factor when used in risk stratification for patients with DTC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信