业界对 FDA 现代化法案 2.0/3.0 的看法:申办者减少药物开发中动物使用的下一步可能措施。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Sarah A Carratt, Christina L Zuch de Zafra, Elias Oziolor, Payal Rana, Nichole R Vansell, Raja Mangipudy, Vishal S Vaidya
{"title":"业界对 FDA 现代化法案 2.0/3.0 的看法:申办者减少药物开发中动物使用的下一步可能措施。","authors":"Sarah A Carratt, Christina L Zuch de Zafra, Elias Oziolor, Payal Rana, Nichole R Vansell, Raja Mangipudy, Vishal S Vaidya","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfae122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmaceutical developers are encouraged to adopt the best practices of being purposefully thoughtful about the use of animals, seeking alternatives wherever possible. They should engage with health authorities to increase their familiarity with the methods, study designs, data outputs, and the context of use for new approach methodologies (NAMs). Although current state of technology does not yet provide adequate models to fully replace in vivo studies, many models are sufficiently good for an augmented approach that will enhance our understanding of in vitro to in vivo correlations and advance the long-term goal of reducing animal use through innovative NAMs. The goal of future nonclinical safety packages is to advance the utilization of such enabling technologies toward appropriate human risk characterization. Establishing confidence in NAMs is a critical first step. For example, sponsors may include both \"traditional\" and NAM-based nonclinical safety data in regulatory submissions to establish confidence with health authorities. In addition, regulators should create a \"safe harbor\" for hybrid nonclinical data packages to facilitate iterative learning, refinement, and implementation of NAM-based safety assessment strategies. Sponsors are urged to contribute to NAMs evolution through consortia participation, peer-reviewed publications, and documenting animal reduction in studies/programs, accelerating the eventual elimination of animal use in pharmaceutical development, as envisioned in the FDA Modernization Act 3.0.</p>","PeriodicalId":23178,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An industry perspective on the FDA Modernization Act 2.0/3.0: potential next steps for sponsors to reduce animal use in drug development.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah A Carratt, Christina L Zuch de Zafra, Elias Oziolor, Payal Rana, Nichole R Vansell, Raja Mangipudy, Vishal S Vaidya\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/toxsci/kfae122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pharmaceutical developers are encouraged to adopt the best practices of being purposefully thoughtful about the use of animals, seeking alternatives wherever possible. They should engage with health authorities to increase their familiarity with the methods, study designs, data outputs, and the context of use for new approach methodologies (NAMs). Although current state of technology does not yet provide adequate models to fully replace in vivo studies, many models are sufficiently good for an augmented approach that will enhance our understanding of in vitro to in vivo correlations and advance the long-term goal of reducing animal use through innovative NAMs. The goal of future nonclinical safety packages is to advance the utilization of such enabling technologies toward appropriate human risk characterization. Establishing confidence in NAMs is a critical first step. For example, sponsors may include both \\\"traditional\\\" and NAM-based nonclinical safety data in regulatory submissions to establish confidence with health authorities. In addition, regulators should create a \\\"safe harbor\\\" for hybrid nonclinical data packages to facilitate iterative learning, refinement, and implementation of NAM-based safety assessment strategies. Sponsors are urged to contribute to NAMs evolution through consortia participation, peer-reviewed publications, and documenting animal reduction in studies/programs, accelerating the eventual elimination of animal use in pharmaceutical development, as envisioned in the FDA Modernization Act 3.0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"28-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae122\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfae122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼓励药品开发商采用最佳做法,在使用动物时有目的地进行深思熟虑,尽可能寻求替代方法。他们应与卫生部门合作,进一步熟悉新方法 (NAM) 的使用方法、研究设计、数据输出和使用环境。尽管目前的技术水平还不能提供完全取代体内研究的足够模型,但许多模型已经足够好,可以用于增强型方法,从而提高我们对体外与体内相关性的理解,并通过创新的非临床方法推进减少动物使用的长期目标。未来非临床安全包的目标是推动此类使能技术的利用,以实现适当的人类风险特征描述。建立对 NAM 的信心是关键的第一步。例如,申办者可在提交的监管资料中同时包括 "传统 "和基于非临床研究的非临床安全性数据,以建立卫生当局的信心。此外,监管机构应为混合非临床数据包创建一个 "安全港",以促进迭代学习、完善和实施基于 NAM 的安全性评估策略。我们敦促申办者通过参与联合体、发表同行评议的出版物、记录研究/计划中减少动物实验的情况等方式,为非临床评估方法的发展做出贡献,从而加快实现《美国食品及药物管理局现代化法案 3.0》中所设想的在药品开发过程中最终取消动物实验的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An industry perspective on the FDA Modernization Act 2.0/3.0: potential next steps for sponsors to reduce animal use in drug development.

Pharmaceutical developers are encouraged to adopt the best practices of being purposefully thoughtful about the use of animals, seeking alternatives wherever possible. They should engage with health authorities to increase their familiarity with the methods, study designs, data outputs, and the context of use for new approach methodologies (NAMs). Although current state of technology does not yet provide adequate models to fully replace in vivo studies, many models are sufficiently good for an augmented approach that will enhance our understanding of in vitro to in vivo correlations and advance the long-term goal of reducing animal use through innovative NAMs. The goal of future nonclinical safety packages is to advance the utilization of such enabling technologies toward appropriate human risk characterization. Establishing confidence in NAMs is a critical first step. For example, sponsors may include both "traditional" and NAM-based nonclinical safety data in regulatory submissions to establish confidence with health authorities. In addition, regulators should create a "safe harbor" for hybrid nonclinical data packages to facilitate iterative learning, refinement, and implementation of NAM-based safety assessment strategies. Sponsors are urged to contribute to NAMs evolution through consortia participation, peer-reviewed publications, and documenting animal reduction in studies/programs, accelerating the eventual elimination of animal use in pharmaceutical development, as envisioned in the FDA Modernization Act 3.0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicological Sciences
Toxicological Sciences 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The mission of Toxicological Sciences, the official journal of the Society of Toxicology, is to publish a broad spectrum of impactful research in the field of toxicology. The primary focus of Toxicological Sciences is on original research articles. The journal also provides expert insight via contemporary and systematic reviews, as well as forum articles and editorial content that addresses important topics in the field. The scope of Toxicological Sciences is focused on a broad spectrum of impactful toxicological research that will advance the multidisciplinary field of toxicology ranging from basic research to model development and application, and decision making. Submissions will include diverse technologies and approaches including, but not limited to: bioinformatics and computational biology, biochemistry, exposure science, histopathology, mass spectrometry, molecular biology, population-based sciences, tissue and cell-based systems, and whole-animal studies. Integrative approaches that combine realistic exposure scenarios with impactful analyses that move the field forward are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信