计算机断层扫描中的偶发甲状腺结节:对患病率、随访和恶性肿瘤风险的系统回顾和 Meta 分析。

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Thyroid Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1089/thy.2024.0313
Zhixing Song, Christopher Wu, Julia Kasmirski, Andrea Gillis, Jessica Fazendin, Brenessa Lindeman, Herbert Chen
{"title":"计算机断层扫描中的偶发甲状腺结节:对患病率、随访和恶性肿瘤风险的系统回顾和 Meta 分析。","authors":"Zhixing Song, Christopher Wu, Julia Kasmirski, Andrea Gillis, Jessica Fazendin, Brenessa Lindeman, Herbert Chen","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The increased utilization of computed tomography (CT) has led to a higher detection rate of thyroid incidentalomas. Currently, there are no widely agreed-upon guidelines for managing these incidentalomas. This study aims to investigate the prevalence, follow-up practices, and malignancy rates of thyroid incidentalomas detected by CT. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies published before April 12, 2024 (PROSPERO #42024535501). Studies reporting on the prevalence, follow-up, and risk of malignancy (ROM) of thyroid incidentalomas detected by CT were included. Combined outcomes were analyzed using pooled proportion with a random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on characteristics including size of the incidentaloma, CT area, and age of the study population. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-eight studies involving 195,959 patients were included in the prevalence analysis, revealing a prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas on CT of 8.3% (confidence interval [CI], 7.4-9.3). The prevalence was higher in neck CT (16.5%, CI, 11.0-22.1) compared with chest CT (6.6%, CI, 5.3-7.9). Multiple incidentalomas were found in 27.0% (CI, 12.9-41.1) of patients. Of the nodules, 46.3% (CI, 32.3-60.3) were ≥1 cm, and 28.6% (CI, 19.9-37.3) were ≥1.5 cm. Thyroid ultrasounds, biopsies, and surgeries were performed in 34.9% (CI, 26.1-43.7), 28.4% (CI, 19.9-36.9), and 8.2% (CI, 2.1-14.4) of cases, respectively. Additionally, 25 studies with 6272 patients reported a ROM of 3.9% (CI, 3.0-4.9) for thyroid incidentalomas detected on CT. A higher ROM was observed in incidentalomas ≥1 cm (11.7%, CI, 3.9-19.4) and ≥1.5 cm (24.9%, CI, 0-52.7) compared with those <1 cm (0.1%, CI, 0-0.8) and <1.5 cm (0%, CI, 0-0.2). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Most thyroid incidentalomas identified on CT are benign. Implementing a collaborative protocol between radiologists and thyroid specialists to manage high-risk thyroid incidentalomas can ensure appropriate follow-up and optimal patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"1389-1400"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidental Thyroid Nodules on Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Examining Prevalence, Follow-Up, and Risk of Malignancy.\",\"authors\":\"Zhixing Song, Christopher Wu, Julia Kasmirski, Andrea Gillis, Jessica Fazendin, Brenessa Lindeman, Herbert Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/thy.2024.0313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The increased utilization of computed tomography (CT) has led to a higher detection rate of thyroid incidentalomas. Currently, there are no widely agreed-upon guidelines for managing these incidentalomas. This study aims to investigate the prevalence, follow-up practices, and malignancy rates of thyroid incidentalomas detected by CT. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies published before April 12, 2024 (PROSPERO #42024535501). Studies reporting on the prevalence, follow-up, and risk of malignancy (ROM) of thyroid incidentalomas detected by CT were included. Combined outcomes were analyzed using pooled proportion with a random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on characteristics including size of the incidentaloma, CT area, and age of the study population. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-eight studies involving 195,959 patients were included in the prevalence analysis, revealing a prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas on CT of 8.3% (confidence interval [CI], 7.4-9.3). The prevalence was higher in neck CT (16.5%, CI, 11.0-22.1) compared with chest CT (6.6%, CI, 5.3-7.9). Multiple incidentalomas were found in 27.0% (CI, 12.9-41.1) of patients. Of the nodules, 46.3% (CI, 32.3-60.3) were ≥1 cm, and 28.6% (CI, 19.9-37.3) were ≥1.5 cm. Thyroid ultrasounds, biopsies, and surgeries were performed in 34.9% (CI, 26.1-43.7), 28.4% (CI, 19.9-36.9), and 8.2% (CI, 2.1-14.4) of cases, respectively. Additionally, 25 studies with 6272 patients reported a ROM of 3.9% (CI, 3.0-4.9) for thyroid incidentalomas detected on CT. A higher ROM was observed in incidentalomas ≥1 cm (11.7%, CI, 3.9-19.4) and ≥1.5 cm (24.9%, CI, 0-52.7) compared with those <1 cm (0.1%, CI, 0-0.8) and <1.5 cm (0%, CI, 0-0.2). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Most thyroid incidentalomas identified on CT are benign. Implementing a collaborative protocol between radiologists and thyroid specialists to manage high-risk thyroid incidentalomas can ensure appropriate follow-up and optimal patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thyroid\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1389-1400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thyroid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0313\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0313","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着计算机断层扫描(CT)使用率的提高,甲状腺偶发瘤的检出率也随之升高。目前,在处理这些偶发瘤方面还没有得到广泛认同的指南。本研究旨在调查 CT 发现的甲状腺偶发瘤的患病率、随访方法和恶变率:我们对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了全面检索,以确定 2024 年 4 月 12 日之前发表的相关研究(PROSPERO #42024535501)。纳入的研究报告了 CT 检测到的甲状腺偶发瘤的患病率、随访情况和恶性风险 (ROM)。综合结果采用随机效应模型的汇总比例(PP)进行分析。偏倚风险采用科克伦随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB2)和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)工具进行评估。根据附带瘤的大小、CT 面积和研究人群的年龄等特征进行了亚组分析:38项涉及195959名患者的研究被纳入患病率分析,结果显示CT上甲状腺偶发瘤的患病率为8.3%(95%置信区间[CI],7.4-9.3)。与胸部CT(6.6%,95% CI,5.3-7.9)相比,颈部CT的患病率更高(16.5%,95% CI,11.0-22.1)。27.0%(95% CI,12.9-41.1)的患者发现了多个偶发瘤。结节中,46.3%(95% CI,32.3-60.3)≥1 厘米,28.6%(95% CI,19.9-37.3)≥1.5 厘米。分别有34.9%(95% CI,26.1-43.7)、28.4%(95% CI,19.9-36.9)和8.2%(95% CI,2.1-14.4)的病例进行了甲状腺超声检查、活检和手术。此外,25项研究共发现了6272例患者,CT检测出的甲状腺偶发瘤的ROM为3.9%(95% CI,3.0-4.9)。与结论相比,≥1厘米(11.7%,95% CI,3.9-19.4)和≥1.5厘米(24.9%,95% CI,0-52.7)的偶发瘤的ROM更高:CT发现的大多数甲状腺偶发瘤都是良性的。放射科医生和甲状腺专科医生之间实施合作方案来管理高风险甲状腺偶发瘤,可以确保适当的随访和最佳的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidental Thyroid Nodules on Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Examining Prevalence, Follow-Up, and Risk of Malignancy.

Background: The increased utilization of computed tomography (CT) has led to a higher detection rate of thyroid incidentalomas. Currently, there are no widely agreed-upon guidelines for managing these incidentalomas. This study aims to investigate the prevalence, follow-up practices, and malignancy rates of thyroid incidentalomas detected by CT. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant studies published before April 12, 2024 (PROSPERO #42024535501). Studies reporting on the prevalence, follow-up, and risk of malignancy (ROM) of thyroid incidentalomas detected by CT were included. Combined outcomes were analyzed using pooled proportion with a random-effects model. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on characteristics including size of the incidentaloma, CT area, and age of the study population. Results: Thirty-eight studies involving 195,959 patients were included in the prevalence analysis, revealing a prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas on CT of 8.3% (confidence interval [CI], 7.4-9.3). The prevalence was higher in neck CT (16.5%, CI, 11.0-22.1) compared with chest CT (6.6%, CI, 5.3-7.9). Multiple incidentalomas were found in 27.0% (CI, 12.9-41.1) of patients. Of the nodules, 46.3% (CI, 32.3-60.3) were ≥1 cm, and 28.6% (CI, 19.9-37.3) were ≥1.5 cm. Thyroid ultrasounds, biopsies, and surgeries were performed in 34.9% (CI, 26.1-43.7), 28.4% (CI, 19.9-36.9), and 8.2% (CI, 2.1-14.4) of cases, respectively. Additionally, 25 studies with 6272 patients reported a ROM of 3.9% (CI, 3.0-4.9) for thyroid incidentalomas detected on CT. A higher ROM was observed in incidentalomas ≥1 cm (11.7%, CI, 3.9-19.4) and ≥1.5 cm (24.9%, CI, 0-52.7) compared with those <1 cm (0.1%, CI, 0-0.8) and <1.5 cm (0%, CI, 0-0.2). Conclusions: Most thyroid incidentalomas identified on CT are benign. Implementing a collaborative protocol between radiologists and thyroid specialists to manage high-risk thyroid incidentalomas can ensure appropriate follow-up and optimal patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信